Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Fri Sep 30, 2022 3:59 pm
Age wrote: ↑Fri Sep 30, 2022 3:02 pm
When 'you' say, "Prove it", what does the 'it' word refer to, to you, EXACTLY?
Also I NEED you to PROVE that you have UNDERSTOOD what I SAID and WROTE here, FIRST. From what you have been writing here you appear to be VERY, VERY CONFUSED and LOST.
Are you ABLE to prove this?
Ok, I see. You are a hypocrite, again.
Every time I see you pressuring others and referring to them as 'you' or 'humans', I will remember that you can't or won't do what you are asking them to do and which, from your perspective, you claim, you think they need to.
AND, what is 'it', which you think or BELIEVE that I can NOT or will NOT do, EXACTLY?
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Fri Sep 30, 2022 3:59 pm
To sum it up for others: Age thinks others bear the onus to demonstrate the truth of their assertions, but he thinks, at the same time, he has no onus to do the same with his.
How SHALLOW and CLOSED you REALLY ARE.
When people, for example, say, "Prove it", and expect the "other" to just JUMP UP and PROVE 'it', then, to do this ACCURATELY and CORRECTLY the "other" has to FIRST LEARN and KNOW what the 'it' word is in relation to, EXACTLY, and this is without even going into to ALL of the OTHER 'things' NEEDED to PROVE some 'thing' True.
You, OBVIOUSLY, have absolutely NO intention of STAYING WITH this and FOLLOWING this through.
I SAID, 'From my perspective... (this and that), and your reply back was; "Prove that sentence". Which, on its own, the ABSURDITY and NONSENSICAL OF speaks for itself.
I am STILL YET TO UNDERSTAND whether you want me to PROVE that 'this and that' is FROM MY PERSPECTIVE, or if 'this and that' is true, or if 'it' is REALLY 'from my perspective', or if it was some thing else entirely different that you wanted me to PROVE IN or ABOUT 'that sentence'. So, until you CLARIFY and/or SPECIFICALLY STIPULATE what 'it' IS, EXACTLY, what you want me to PROVE, then I have absolutely NO idea, and I am NOT now going to just START ASSUMING.
Also, what is become MORE OBVIOUS and CLEAR is that because of your TIGHTLY HELD ONTO BELIEF that PROVE can NOT be PROVIDED in words, on a screen, you will, even unconsciously, SABOTAGE this so that I can NOT PROVE absolutely ANY thing, in which case you are REINFORCING YOUR CURRENTLY HELD ONTO BELIEF. Which is just ANOTHER PURE CASE and EXAMPLE of 'confirmation bias' AT WORK.
See, if one was Truly CURIOS and Truly INTERESTED in PROOF, then they would KEEP CHALLENGING and/or QUESTIONING for PROOF until it is PROVIDED and GIVEN or until the "other" GIVES UP in DEFEAT or just DECLARES DEFEAT.
Now, I am PREPARED TO STAY and back up and support MY WORDS and CLAIMS with ACTUAL PROOF, but are you PREPARED TO STAY?
We will just have to WAIT, to SEE.
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Fri Sep 30, 2022 3:59 pm
And Age will play all sorts of little games to make it seem like they bear the onus so he is not on the spot.
LOL Here is ANOTHER PRIME EXAMPLE of ONLY SEEING what one WANTS TO SEE.
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Fri Sep 30, 2022 3:59 pm
I will see this hypocrisy in your repeated approach here. You might fool others, but a few of us have noticed your hypocrisy.
LOL "iwannaplato". This is what has ACTUALLY HAPPENED and OCCURRED here. You BELIEVE ABSOLUTELY things like 'free will' can NOT be PROVED through words alone, on a screen, and this BELIEF of YOURS also MAKES YOU BELIEVE that there are OTHER 'things' that can NOT be PROVED through words, on a screen. So, what this then MAKES you DO is CHALLENGE me to, "Prove it", and when I just SEEK CLARITY of what 'it' IS, EXACTLY, and of a few other things, then 'you' DECLARE that I am a HYPOCRITE and that I can NOT or will NOT PROVE 'it', (still whatever 'it' is EXACTLY?)
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Fri Sep 30, 2022 3:59 pm
That may matter to you. It may not. You just made it obvious that your entire approach to other people posting here is a farce.
LOL You could NOT be FURTHER from thee ACTUAL and IRREFUTABLE Truth, and ALL you are REALLY DOING now is just 'trying to' DEFLECT and GET AWAY from EVER even giving me a CHANCE to PROVE some UNKNOWN 'thing, BECAUSE if I did, then that would SHOOT DOWN YOUR BELIEF DOWN COMPLETELY, and ULTIMATELY, and literally, SHOOT 'you' DOWN in pieces ALSO.
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Fri Sep 30, 2022 3:59 pm
It is quite telling that suddnely you started insulting me when you realized you had a problem.
LOL "iwannaplato".
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Fri Sep 30, 2022 3:59 pm
Spotted. Back on ignore.
"Back to ignore" is CODE FOR, "I am going to RUN AWAY and HIDE now BECAUSE I AM Truly SCARED that if I EVER DISCLOSE what 'it' is, EXACTLY, that I alluded to wanting PROVED, and the "other" DID PROVE 'it', then I would have absolutely NOTHING LEFT".