Then you've answered your own question. Obviously.Age wrote: ↑Thu Jan 13, 2022 9:09 pmBut I do NOT want you to 'believe' my claim, OBVIOUSLY.
free will: yep, another thread about 'that'...
Re: free will: yep, another thread about 'that'...
Re: free will: yep, another thread about 'that'...
Did I?
WHERE and WHEN? And,
WHAT was the question, and, WHAT was the answer?
SHOW us just how 'OBVIOUS' this REALLY IS, to you.
Re: free will: yep, another thread about 'that'...
Did you NOT read where I wrote;
What is a 'Claimer', to you?
Until you CLARIFY this question, I may not be able to 'show' you a 'Claimer'.
Also, are 'you' ABLE to 'see' ANY thing without those physical eyes?
Re: free will: yep, another thread about 'that'...
I READ THIS.
BUT, I am STILL WAITING for you to answer thee ACTUAL QUESTION that I posed and asked you.
Re: free will: yep, another thread about 'that'...
Re: free will: yep, another thread about 'that'...
LOL If that body had NO eyes, then because that body, literally, could NOT see ANY thing, then you would BELIEVE that there is absolutely NO thing AT ALL, correct?
LOOK, you are NOT even CAPABLE of SHOWING us what you CLAIM and BELIEVE is true. So, you will NEVER be able to SEE what is ACTUALLY IN FRONT of you.
Re: free will: yep, another thread about 'that'...
The question was answered I have never seen a ''Claimer''Age wrote: ↑Fri Jan 14, 2022 12:03 pmLOL If that body had NO eyes, then because that body, literally, could NOT see ANY thing, then you would BELIEVE that there is absolutely NO thing AT ALL, correct?
LOOK, you are NOT even CAPABLE of SHOWING us what you CLAIM and BELIEVE is true. So, you will NEVER be able to SEE what is ACTUALLY IN FRONT of you.
Re: free will: yep, another thread about 'that'...
I will ask in another way, 'What, EXACTLY, is this 'thing', which you call a 'Claimer', and which you have NOT YET seen?Dontaskme wrote: ↑Fri Jan 14, 2022 12:56 pmThe question was answered I have never seen a ''Claimer''Age wrote: ↑Fri Jan 14, 2022 12:03 pmLOL If that body had NO eyes, then because that body, literally, could NOT see ANY thing, then you would BELIEVE that there is absolutely NO thing AT ALL, correct?
LOOK, you are NOT even CAPABLE of SHOWING us what you CLAIM and BELIEVE is true. So, you will NEVER be able to SEE what is ACTUALLY IN FRONT of you.
Re: free will: yep, another thread about 'that'...
So, what, EXACTLY, a 'Claimer', to you, is a "Claimer".
Okay. So, now we KNOW and UNDERSTAND that 'you', the one KNOWN as "dontaskme" here, CLAIMS that it has NEVER seen a "Claimer".
Are 'you' AWARE what a human being who makes CLAIMS is ALSO KNOWN as?
Have 'you' EVER seen a human body?
And, is it POSSIBLE to 'you' that some ACTUAL objects can NOT be seen, with the physical eyes?
Re: free will: yep, another thread about 'that'...
I know how to say "There is no "Knower" the same way you know how to say '' So, now we KNOW''