Dontaskme wrote: ↑Tue Jan 11, 2022 9:57 am
Age wrote: ↑Tue Jan 11, 2022 9:30 am
We KNOW 'you' NEVER said your "logic" here is Wrong.
'you' do NOT need to say your "logic" here is Wrong. We can SEE, VERY CLEARLY, that your "logic" here is Wrong.
Any one can claim ''logical assertions'' are wrong, but no one has ever seen 'the knower' of logical assertion.
But, AGAIN, this 'assertion' is OBVIOUSLY Wrong.
This is because 'you' do NOT YET KNOW HOW to SEE what the word 'see' ACTUALLY MEANS and REFERS TO, EXACTLY. And this is because 'you' are just looking at 'things' from just one human being perspective and NOT LOOKING AT 'things' from Everything's perspective as One.
When, and IF, 'you' learn and start LOOKING and SEEING from thee One's perspective instead of from just that little old one's perspective, then 'you' WILL SEE and UNDERSTAND a LOT MORE than 'you' are now, in the days when this was being written.
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Tue Jan 11, 2022 9:57 am
If you claim you have seen the knower of 'wrong logical assertion', then prove your claim with actual evidence so that WE CAN ALL see what 'the knower' of ''wrong logical assertions'' looks like.
Again, 'you' are ONLY looking at 'things' here from one individual human being's perspective and NOT LOOKING at what the word 'look' is referring to EXACTLY.
HOW MANY TIMES do 'you' have to be TOLD that an INVISIBLE 'thing' like thee Mind, thoughts, AND emotions do NOT 'look' like ANY thing, from the physical sense of 'seeing' 'things' BEFORE 'you' will COMPREHEND and UNDERSTAND this Fact?
Also, is "wrong logical assertions" an oxymoron anyway?
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Tue Jan 11, 2022 9:57 am
Age wrote: ↑Tue Jan 11, 2022 9:30 amWhat, EXACTLY, are you referring to now?
I'm referring to this comment made by yours truly >( And, AGAIN, this is because you a making another ASSUMPTION, based on another thing that is Wrong.)
WELL that is EXACTLY WHAT you DID, and EXACTLY WHY you DID IT. I was just POINTING THIS OUT, for "others" to SEE and BECOME AWARE OF.
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Tue Jan 11, 2022 9:57 am
Age wrote: ↑Mon Jan 10, 2022 10:36 am
So, 'you' do NOT know WHY I said that what 'you' wrote was OBVIOUSLY NOT necessarily true EITHER, which is PERFECTLY UNDERSTANDABLE, especially considering 'who' and 'what' 'you' are, EXACTLY.
By the way, if you EVER do want to KNOW WHY what you have said IS NOT necessarily true, then just let us know and we will INFORM 'you'.
But I do not want to know anything, I'm just responding to comments that you are making, with my own comments in response to what you have made.
.
AND, you NOT wanting to KNOW ANY thing is WHY 'you' are STILL SO VERY LOST and SO VERY CONFUSED here.