100% of evidence is of material reality. The only discrepancies are in interpretation.
If you see an illusion, you have Actually seen an illusion, despite not knowing so. The light entering your eyes need not have been reflected off a material object to be real. The sensation created is real. The interpretation may not be.
If you think you've seen something that later turns out to be false, the problem is not with reality or how it presents itself.
the proof is in the pudding, and the cake, and the pie...
- attofishpi
- Posts: 10013
- Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
- Location: Orion Spur
- Contact:
Re: the proof is in the pudding, and the cake, and the pie...
precisely, so Y does it MATTER?
...and who or what is going to be the brain bank of what is REAL or FALSE?Advocate wrote: ↑Fri Jan 29, 2021 6:41 pmIf you see an illusion, you have Actually seen an illusion, despite not knowing so. The light entering your eyes need not have been reflected off a material object to be real. The sensation created is real. The interpretation may not be.
If you think you've seen something that later turns out to be false, the problem is not with reality or how it presents itself.
Re: the proof is in the pudding, and the cake, and the pie...
[quote=attofishpi post_id=493267 time=1611952303 user_id=6293]
[quote=Advocate post_id=493243 time=1611942077 user_id=15238]
100% of evidence is of material reality. The only discrepancies are in interpretation.[/quote]
precisely, so Y does it MATTER?
[quote=Advocate post_id=493243 time=1611942077 user_id=15238]If you see an illusion, you have Actually seen an illusion, despite not knowing so. The light entering your eyes need not have been reflected off a material object to be real. The sensation created is real. The interpretation may not be.
If you think you've seen something that later turns out to be false, the problem is not with reality or how it presents itself.
[/quote]
...and who or what is going to be the brain bank of what is REAL or FALSE?
[/quote]
That's what evidence is all about.
[quote=Advocate post_id=493243 time=1611942077 user_id=15238]
100% of evidence is of material reality. The only discrepancies are in interpretation.[/quote]
precisely, so Y does it MATTER?
[quote=Advocate post_id=493243 time=1611942077 user_id=15238]If you see an illusion, you have Actually seen an illusion, despite not knowing so. The light entering your eyes need not have been reflected off a material object to be real. The sensation created is real. The interpretation may not be.
If you think you've seen something that later turns out to be false, the problem is not with reality or how it presents itself.
[/quote]
...and who or what is going to be the brain bank of what is REAL or FALSE?
[/quote]
That's what evidence is all about.
- attofishpi
- Posts: 10013
- Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
- Location: Orion Spur
- Contact:
Re: the proof is in the pudding, and the cake, and the pie...
precisely, so Y does it MATTER?
Advocate wrote:That's what evidence is all about.attocunt wrote:...and who or what is going to be the brain bank of what is REAL or FALSE?Advocate wrote: ↑Fri Jan 29, 2021 6:41 pmIf you see an illusion, you have Actually seen an illusion, despite not knowing so. The light entering your eyes need not have been reflected off a material object to be real. The sensation created is real. The interpretation may not be.
If you think you've seen something that later turns out to be false, the problem is not with reality or how it presents itself.
SO THEN - based on what U have stated...how do U or anyone decide what IS the actual EVIDENCE - TRUE OR FALSE?
(and btw DUDE - wot is wrong with your ability to quote on a forum? !!!!!!! )