solving philosophy part 2 (semantics)

So what's really going on?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Post Reply
Advocate
Posts: 3470
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2017 9:27 am
Contact:

solving philosophy part 2 (semantics)

Post by Advocate »

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... =622235762

That document answers more philosophical questions (logically, cohesively, consistently, etc.) than any philosophy book ever written. Care to test the contention?
Greylorn Ell
Posts: 892
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 9:13 pm
Location: SE Arizona

Re: solving philosophy part 2 (semantics)

Post by Greylorn Ell »

The referenced document could be the worst garbage I've read on any so-called philosophy forum.

It fails to address the beginnings of that which we know to exist.

GL
Advocate
Posts: 3470
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2017 9:27 am
Contact:

Re: solving philosophy part 2 (semantics)

Post by Advocate »

[quote="Greylorn Ell" post_id=473508 time=1601314400 user_id=9668]
The referenced document could be the worst garbage I've read on any so-called philosophy forum.

It fails to address the beginnings of that which we know to exist.

GL
[/quote]

neither does Winnie-the-Pooh address economics
PeteJ
Posts: 427
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2015 1:15 pm

Re: solving philosophy part 2 (semantics)

Post by PeteJ »

Does this spreadsheet have some purpose?

If so, what?
Advocate
Posts: 3470
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2017 9:27 am
Contact:

Re: solving philosophy part 2 (semantics)

Post by Advocate »

[quote=PeteJ post_id=474875 time=1602235031 user_id=11479]
Does this spreadsheet have some purpose?

If so, what?
[/quote]

Take your favourite philosophy problem, apply those understandings to any relevant terms, and poof, it will solve itself. To the extent it's bound within the understandings the doc touches on, which is most of philosophy i'd think.
Post Reply