3 dimensionality Is Changing 2d Images

[Eodnhoj7]

I will use a sphere as an example.

1. Observe a single circle.

2. This single circle repeats into another circle. This new circle is the same size as the original circle, however it appears as smaller due to distance. This can be observed with two cars, both the same, but one is smaller than the other from a reference frame in which one is closer to the observer than the other.

3. The repetition of the circles observes one circle existing in one position, another circle existing in another position. This positional observes a continual repetition of circles within circles all existing in different positions, but all fundamentally the same circle.


4. Size is thus position in space. Taking a standard inch and aligning it with a 2 inch object, size differential is grounded in both existing in different positions in space...yet both are still the same line. The 1 inch linear object composes x position, the 2 inche object y position.

5. The position of the proceeding "new" circle in itself observes a cycle of "cycles", thus each circle as an inherently empty context, as repeating observes an intrinsic emptiness between each new circle. From a side view we can observes this as binary code where each circle from the side is a line (1) with an empty space (0) between them.

6. The circle repeating into further circles observes a cone a first glance, if we are to assume linear time. The cone may expand from a single point or contract from a single point, but each point of origin is not just a circle but effectively a "line" considering a 2d circle from the side is a line.

However this circular projecting to further circles in one linear direction, as a triangle, observes a lack of recursion within the circle, as the circle is only projecting in 1 direct.

This 1 direction, if recursive, must project to 2, 3, 4, etc... to infinity directions. Thus the circle is repeating in all directions where even this recursion is circular as repetition is circularity.

7. So from a side view the cone is projecting through repeated triangles in all directions, with each new direction existing as a degree and fraction of a degrees as a set of degrees within a degree.

A triangle expanding in opposite directions observes an hour glass figure.

This inverted from one state (horizon) observes a set of vertical cones and we can see a square as four triangles.

This inverted again observes an 8 gon...so on and so forth until with get an infinity-gon as a circle.

Each inversion, one formed state changing into many, is grounded in an inherent doubling. We can observe inversion as doubling in the isomorphism of light and dark, being and non being, good and evil, etc...to infinity...all of these dualisms requiring a cyclic tension of alternation in accords with eachother as rhythms, thus the circle can be observed as a symbol through of all dualism through its inherent 2 dimensional nature. 2 dimensionality is duality.

8. The inversion of one circle in another circle, and one set of circles into another set of circles (observing the triangle as the grounding of what constitutes a set of circles), is a movement from one to many with each many being one in itself, thus is circular.

An example of this one to many with this many as one can be observe in counting. 1 orange is counted. Then a second orange is counted. This second orange is one orange in itself as the original orange existing in a super positioned state of reality, while these two orangesl are still 1 set of oranges.

Each repetition of a phenomena, as a cycling of that phenomena, effectively is the containment of emptiness through the repetition of that form.

Each triangle, as a linear repetition of circles, is the containment of formlessness through form much in the same manner one wall and another wall contain emptiness.

The circle as a form, contains emptiness. The circle as a dynamic function through repetition also contains emptiness. This emptiness is Formlessness. This Formless Is Observed By The Inversion Of One Form Into Another. These Many Forms Are What We Call "Change" Or "Movement".

9. The Sphere Observes A Recursion Of 2D Circles In All Directions, With All Directions 2 Dimensionally Being A Circle. The Sphere Is This A Cycle Of Cycles Through A Cycle.

However The Sphere Is Always Observed As A 2D Object Until Another Center Point is Observed, With This Center Point Always Being A Center Of A Circle.

The Center Of The interior of the Sphere, as A Triangle Expanding, Always Shows The Recursion Of Circles. The Outside Of The Sphere, Any Center Point, Always Results In A Triangle Expanding To The Center Of The Sphere As Half Of It...Again As a Recursion Of Circles.


10. Any observable point of the sphere is thus a two dimensional circle repeating to further 2 dimensional circle infinitely with "infinity" represented through the circle as an infinity gon...again. The sphere as 3 dimensional observes this third dimension of "depth" as change.

Depth as change, embodied through the universality of the sphere as all cycles of reality, can be observed in standard reality. Observing any reality as static and from a fixed point necessitates it as flat. Only upon the movement of ones position or the movement of another object does depth occur.

It is the intrinsic emptiness between the original position and the new position which gives an perception to what we call depth. 3 dimensional imaging exploits this, as any image which "pops out" as an intrinsically assumed emptiness that gives the impression of separate images (a form of recursion is implied in this as image repeating to image containing emptiness through a blurred image in between).

11. Reality as a series of 2 dimensional images, inverting to and repeating to further 2 dimensional image observes depth or "three dimensionality" as the intrinsic point of change. This repetition of 2 dimensional image into another 2 dimensional image observes a dualism of dualisms which again is three dimensional or triadic.

Three dimensionality is thus change and form as one.

[Impenitent]

can you see the triangle with 3 right angles?

-Imp

[Eodnhoj7]

can you see the triangle with 3 right angles?

-Imp

Can you provide quips longer than one sentence that fit in contexts?

[Impenitent]

it was a simple question; but if you can't see the triangle, look at a globe...

-Imp

[Eodnhoj7]

it was a simple question; but if you can't see the triangle, look at a globe...

-Imp

Point taken, we can only see the triangle as we turn the globe which requires us to see it in parts...thus is is always synthesizing.

Yeah it exists, but it exists as dynamic change or a time zone considering it is observed in consecutive 2d images.

The consecutive images can be observed as the three right angles, as a static chain of images...but this would require a series of 2d images to effectively be a 2d image.