Wyman,Wyman wrote: ↑Wed Feb 20, 2019 6:17 pmThat is an interesting theory, especially as it ties to how consciousness, or life, seems (maybe) to run counter to the laws of thermodynamics. I remember a long time ago having interesting discussion with you on the topic. But you have to elaborate on your theory, as right now, in this thread, it is very ambiguous as stated so far.Greylorn Ell wrote: ↑Sat Feb 16, 2019 1:51 amWyman,
Yes. I see it as the space from which single potentially conscious units came into being.
The force manifested by Aeon space is that which powers the deepest level of your mind, and even of mine now and then.
Of course there is more to be added by way of explanation, like how those units realize their potential.
Your reminder triggers a few neurons.
In Jan. 2017 I broke my back and spent 3 months in a rehab place, happily taking every painkiller they'd give me. Upon returning home I gave up the pills and reverted to the time-honored emotional/physical anesthetic, ethanol-- plus wintertime firewood management. Since then my mind has refocused. I gave up my lucrative business to focus upon healing others and getting back to philosophical work, no matter how unrewarding it has been and will be. This thread is part of that refocusing attempt. It will be limited, as will I.
I apologize for not recalling our previous conversations. Many neurons have disappeared from my brain since our earlier conversations. Concepts are not stored in the brain, so those remain, and have continued to develop.
This thread was an attempt to refocus and see how an attempt to present somewhat radical, but rational ideas, might fare. So far, poorly.
This winter in the mountains has been ugly, and gathering enough wood to heat my cabin to 60 deg has been no fun, so my attention to this thread has been intermittent. I'm also working on a synopsis for an essay on the subject of Natural Creation /Beon Theory, which I will be happy to send you upon completion.
BTW,so far as it has been explained on this thread, my theory is not ambiguous. It is merely incomplete. One might deduce it from existing explanations, but that seems unlikely. I seem to have a peculiar combination of physics/logic background, plus divergent asshole attitude. Would not wish the same on anyone I liked.
Your support in discouraging the trolls and sandbaggers from showing up here will be appreciated.
posting.php?mode=quote&f=16&p=396235&si ... 39c618c46e