The Paradox of a Simultaneously Expanding and Contracting Circle

So what's really going on?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Post Reply
Eodnhoj7
Posts: 8595
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:18 am

The Paradox of a Simultaneously Expanding and Contracting Circle

Post by Eodnhoj7 »

The Paradox of a Simultaneously Expanding and Contracting Circle

For the same of argument lets invert the standard interpretation of "being existing in nothingness" to "being encapsulating nothingness".

Being exists if and only if it moves and a theoretical circle encapsulating nothingness as nowhere to move except itself, with "nothingness" being an observation of point of curvature existing relative to another. This movement, considering the circle projects in all directions simultaneously, observes the expandansion of the circle as moving nowhere except towards itself. This expansion towards itself however causes a contradiction to where the circle can only contract.

This contraction in turn causes the circle to exist through nothingness, under its own movement, however with this movement comes another problem as "nothingness" observes an inherent relation of the circle to itself implying that any form of contraction inevitably results in a change in size. In simpler terms, "nothingness" shrinks through the "being" of the circle. However, as nothingness cannot be observed except through relation, this nothingness fundamentally does not change, so while the circle contracts under movement it fundamentally causes the observation of "nothingness" (as relation) to shrink in respect to the circle becoming denser.

The problem occurs that as "nothingness" shrinks (observation of relation becoming denser) it causes the circle to simultaneosly expand considering this act of self-relation is the only means through which the size of the circle is measured through movement.

So the circle simultaneously expands and contracts at the same time so where expansion outwards can be observed as extradimensional movement, and contraction inwards as intradimensional movement, the circle moves simultaneously inwards and outwards as both extradimensional and intradimensional.

This duality of opposites, extradimensionality and intradimensionality, leads to a contradiction unless a third option is available where the circle is viewed as interdimensional as a means of movement in itself where it mediates between extradimensional and intradimensial movements as:

1) "both/and" in the respect it is limited through extradimensional and intradimensional movement.
2) "neither/nor" in the respect it has no limit of movement.
3) As a universal medial limit in itself.
Post Reply