Size as Movement

So what's really going on?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Post Reply
Eodnhoj7
Posts: 8595
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:18 am

Size as Movement

Post by Eodnhoj7 »

Extension from a seperate thread and the rejuvenation of an old one:


Less than or greater than necessitates a direction in relation. So while 3 may be greater than 2, or 2 is less than three we observe:

1) Direction as expansion and contraction in relativistic size.

2) 2 being less than three observes 3 contracting quantitatively to 2 or 2 expanding quantitatively to 3.

Size, in these respects as quantitative, is direction through expansion and contraction with this expansion and contraction necessitating movement which we observing in the infinite progression of fractals.

Observing "→" is strictly observing a unified infinite movement as a constant boundary in itself. Observing 1 → 2 → 3 → 4 → ∞ in itself is another series of observed relations through direction as movement which in turn exists as 1(1 → 2 → 3 → 4 → ∞) which as 1 can be further observed as

_________1_________ In these respects each number is an observation of direction as change.
(1 → 2 → 3 → 4 → ∞)

with this in itself being 1 unit...and the number line progresses. In these respects the number line exists through a "folding function" conducive to simple alternation resulting in frequency. This folding observes that the number line must direct itself to further number lines, through itself (under a form of repitition as alternation) in order to exist.

We can see this inherent nature of "frequency" through repitition as alternation inherent with the flux of the city examples themselves.



In simpler terms each number is a localization of changing relations, as the boundary of the change itself which composed further change. Localization is an observation of change

viewtopic.php?f=16&t=24445
Post Reply