Angles and Quantum Entanglement

So what's really going on?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Post Reply
Eodnhoj7
Posts: 8595
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:18 am

Angles and Quantum Entanglement

Post by Eodnhoj7 »

Quantum Angles
1) What we understand of the angle is a line relative to another line through a 0d point. The line as directed in one direction in turn is inverted through the 0d point by being directed into an opposite direction, with the opposite direction giving the relation necessary for the original line to project itself in one direction through 0d space as the point.

2) This original line approaching the 0d point ad-infinitum causes it to appear as condense when taken from a view of progressing from the origin point of view to an extending horizon. This expansion, from the origin point of view, to its condensation at the horizon as it approaches the 0d point in turn gives the line volume. The line as volume observes the line as direction, and the corresponding edges, forming the line as fundamentally having a triadic nature of the exterior lines (2 of them) relating to form and interior line (as 1).

3) This triadic nature of the line approaching the 0d point observes the line existing simultaneously as an angle, and in these respects the angle can be observed as the premise of the line if the point of origin (line or angle) is inverted.

4) The line exists through the angle and the angle exists through the line, and the point of relation observes a difference in size as the line is a quantum angle and the angle is a macro-line. This relation of the angle to the line, observes an inherent nature of ratios which give premise to the size where the line measured against itself result in a multiplictious nature.

5) As observe in point 4 the premise of the ratio is observed by a form of individuation in which the line folds through itself under the 0d point. The line approaching the 0d point in turn results in an angle as a form of multiple lines, with this angle as line inverting through the 0d point as another line which forms the original angle into a relative 1d line to the new line…which in turn exists as its own angle.
a) (((1A/3L → 3L/1A) / (3L/1A → 1A/3L)) / ((1A/3L → 3L/1A) / (3L/1A → 1A/3L))) → f(∞)
****With L= Line and A= Angle

6) The angle as the foundation for degrees exists through an alternation of size where one angle is composed of further angles as the premise for previous and further angles. In these respects as the angle is composed of further angles, the angle maintains a degree of quantum entanglement where “x” angle may be different in size from “y” angle, it is fundamentally the same angle as a ratio or set of relations. In these respects the large affects the small and the small affects the large because of this nature of the “ratio” as the boundary which gives premise to the nature of the angle as a thing in itself.
Post Reply