Book reviews
Book reviews
I like the thread where people tell us what they are currently reading but perhaps we could go a little further. Anyone interested in participating in a thread where we actually provide short reviews of books we have recently read, say 300-500 words? I would be happy to start if there is any interest in doing this sort of thing.
ATTENTION: RICK LEWIS
I'm definitely interested in your proposal. Maybe Rick Lewis will add a topic section called "Members' Book Reviews"
-
- Posts: 1523
- Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 1:10 am
- Location: Augsburg
Alternatively, may I suggest that each reviewer starts their own thread of book reviews here in the Book Club section - "Rortabend's Reviews", RachelAnn's Reviews", etc. ? Some discussion will probably arise, but that is not really the aim of reviews, and my guess is that many enjoyable reviews wouldn't generate a thread of their own at all.
mickthinks wrote:Alternatively, may I suggest that each reviewer starts their own thread of book reviews here in the Book Club section - "Rortabend's Reviews", RachelAnn's Reviews", etc. ? Some discussion will probably arise, but that is not really the aim of reviews, and my guess is that many enjoyable reviews wouldn't generate a thread of their own at all.
a great idea
-
- Posts: 1523
- Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 1:10 am
- Location: Augsburg
Hi Rortabend
R: Anyone feel like posting a review?
M: I'm not sure I see the point. If I want a review of a book, I can go to eg Amazon. However, I do like the little pointers people give to why a book might be useful, fun to read but 'review' sounds kinda bothersome.
In a previous life, a few of us talked about the philosophical points and our interpretation of a particular book eg Marcus Aurelius. That was fun and rewarding ! But that means people having a copy and I see the problem with that...
It was kinda guided by a certain someone who had read it, sometimes picking out the exciting bits. This certainly increased my enthusiasm - the teeter-totter was far from dull.
Maybe, if people splashed out a paragraph they enjoyed, wetting the appetite of others?
R: Anyone feel like posting a review?
M: I'm not sure I see the point. If I want a review of a book, I can go to eg Amazon. However, I do like the little pointers people give to why a book might be useful, fun to read but 'review' sounds kinda bothersome.
In a previous life, a few of us talked about the philosophical points and our interpretation of a particular book eg Marcus Aurelius. That was fun and rewarding ! But that means people having a copy and I see the problem with that...
It was kinda guided by a certain someone who had read it, sometimes picking out the exciting bits. This certainly increased my enthusiasm - the teeter-totter was far from dull.
Maybe, if people splashed out a paragraph they enjoyed, wetting the appetite of others?
I think this is kind of pointless and lazy. I've seen this done quite a lot on this forum and I just don't see the point. Quotes of one or two sentences are fine but anything longer I just don't see the point. This is supposed to be a philosophy forum. Go read soemthing and tell us what you think of it, why you agree or disgree with it. I've got plenty of books I haven't read at home, I don't need to see parts of them reproduced here.Maybe, if people splashed out a paragraph they enjoyed, wetting the appetite of others?