Department of Ad Hominem, 4th Floor. Going up?

[Advocate]

Government should have a separate department for rooting out each class of logical fallacy.

[Impenitent]

the ministry of silly walks needs to be funded first

-Imp

[FlashDangerpants]

Government should have a separate department for rooting out each class of logical fallacy.

It's a good job they have access to the absolute genius who "fixed the no true scotsman" fallacy with his epic argument that there is indeed an actual man in Scotland. You can start them off with that.

[Iwannaplato]

Government should have a separate department for rooting out each class of logical fallacy.

And then some sort of fallacy Internal Affairs to go after that. Otherwise we'd just have what we have now...an oligharchy controlling its own regulation and the regulation of any critical citizens or alternatives.

And then you need an internal affairs to look at the first one.

[Advocate]

[quote=FlashDangerpants post_id=572541 time=1652423438 user_id=11800]
[quote=Advocate post_id=572220 time=1652315986 user_id=15238]
Government should have a separate department for rooting out each class of logical fallacy.
[/quote]

It's a good job they have access to the absolute genius who "fixed the no true scotsman" fallacy with his epic argument that there is indeed an actual man in Scotland. You can start them off with that.
[/quote]

There is no fallacy if there is a true Scotsman, is the point there.

[FlashDangerpants]

Government should have a separate department for rooting out each class of logical fallacy.

It's a good job they have access to the absolute genius who "fixed the no true scotsman" fallacy with his epic argument that there is indeed an actual man in Scotland. You can start them off with that.

There is no fallacy if there is a true Scotsman, is the point there.

Lol. You are so fucking stupid.

[Advocate]

[quote=FlashDangerpants post_id=572615 time=1652446701 user_id=11800]
[quote=Advocate post_id=572563 time=1652432110 user_id=15238]
There is no fallacy if there is a true Scotsman, is the point there.
[/quote]

Lol. You are so fucking stupid.
[/quote]

What is it that you don't understand about the fallacy meaning pointing to an imaginary reference point? Or are you just being obtuse because it gives you the jollies?

[trokanmariel]

Government should have a separate department for rooting out each class of logical fallacy.

You're suggesting, that the national government should have a philosophy department?

The creator of jobs, ostensibly after in a physical sense the TV reality of Earth, and this doesn't mean that they're trying to locate the TV reality of Earth, but that they're placed after the reality, deserves to be over the matter as length of mental illness as an agent against magic's stillness as movement in waiting aristocracy.

But where do they live, the creator of jobs?
Wherever they live, they deserve to be a protector of truth paradigm, relative to jobs being the obvious dichotomy.

Alas: why don't they intervene in the war against Ukraine?
If the answer, revolves around stillness as movement in waiting aristocracy having the moral capacity to switch allegiances, then thus, it's required to examine the matter of stillness as movement in waiting:
Whatever it is, it's a cynical user of personal reference after quantity, the personal reference after quantity paradigm being this text, and the meaning of cynical user being the angel Lalo.

Luckily, the term cynical is a secret sex sound word, so the creator of jobs can sustain the computer's no no no with Lalo's yes yes yes

[FlashDangerpants]

There is no fallacy if there is a true Scotsman, is the point there.

Lol. You are so fucking stupid.

What is it that you don't understand about the fallacy meaning pointing to an imaginary reference point? Or are you just being obtuse because it gives you the jollies?

You have such a severe narcissistic personality disorder that you couldn't even be bothered to find out what the fallacy is before awarding yourself honours for fixing it.

[Advocate]

[quote=FlashDangerpants post_id=572657 time=1652456232 user_id=11800]
[quote=Advocate post_id=572617 time=1652446903 user_id=15238]
[quote=FlashDangerpants post_id=572615 time=1652446701 user_id=11800]


Lol. You are so fucking stupid.
[/quote]

What is it that you don't understand about the fallacy meaning pointing to an imaginary reference point? Or are you just being obtuse because it gives you the jollies?
[/quote]

You have such a severe narcissistic personality disorder that you couldn't even be bothered to find out what the fallacy is before awarding yourself honours for fixing it.
[/quote]

No thanks, have a nice day.

[FlashDangerpants]

Tell the people what you think the no-true-scotsman fallacy means.

[Advocate]

[quote=FlashDangerpants post_id=572683 time=1652465898 user_id=11800]
Tell the people what you think the no-true-scotsman fallacy means.
[/quote]

I just did

[FlashDangerpants]

Tell the people what you think the no-true-scotsman fallacy means.

I just did

So before the greatest and humblest philosopher ever to live addressed it so mightily, how did the actual fallacy work? How could one commit the No True Scotsman Fallacy?

[Advocate]

[quote=FlashDangerpants post_id=572707 time=1652471073 user_id=11800]
[quote=Advocate post_id=572700 time=1652470305 user_id=15238]
[quote=FlashDangerpants post_id=572683 time=1652465898 user_id=11800]
Tell the people what you think the no-true-scotsman fallacy means.
[/quote]

I just did
[/quote]
So before the greatest and humblest philosopher ever to live addressed it so mightily, how did the actual fallacy work? How could one commit the No True Scotsman Fallacy?
[/quote]

I don't know whether you noticed which is why I'm bringing it to your attention, but that's not the topic.

[FlashDangerpants]

I just did

So before the greatest and humblest philosopher ever to live addressed it so mightily, how did the actual fallacy work? How could one commit the No True Scotsman Fallacy?

I don't know whether you noticed which is why I'm bringing it to your attention, but that's not the topic.

You started a thread about fallacies.
Please explain how the No True Scotsman fallacy works so that we can all understand how your proof that there is such a thing as a Scotsman fixes it.