Should NATO dismantle?

[Dontaskme]

You didn't forget. It never registered in your noggin.

I never forget stupidity. It's that kind of thing that one never forgets.

How about you?

[Dontaskme]

You're granted me authority to make you do something? Okay. Review the thread. Your point has been answered. Your point is wrong.

Hey thanks for making my thread really popular...It's smoking hot right now.. all because of you.

[Walker]

You're welcome. It needed some rational, truthful, objective, serious thought.

[Dontaskme]

My side is truth and rationality. Your irrationality is the only fire.

What's not rational is not wanting to dismantle NATO..what's rational is.

Just a fact.

[Dontaskme]

You're welcome. It needed some rational, truthful, objective, serious thought.

Yep, well at least that's something useful to think about.

[Walker]

You're welcome. It needed some rational, truthful, objective, serious thought.

Yep, well at least that's something useful to think about.

Of course it is. Also, it proved that your point is wrong, which you should find useful.

[Dontaskme]

You're welcome. It needed some rational, truthful, objective, serious thought.

Yep, well at least that's something useful to think about.

Of course it is. Also, it proved that your point is wrong, which you should find useful.

Well of course my point is wrong...if it was not wrong then you wouldn't be right...would you?

[Dontaskme]

So anyways...back to the main issue...should NATO dismantle....

Yes, because forming alliances against other countries is a dumb stupid game, that has zero intelligence.

We're either for each other or against each other...there's no middle way.

We need to close the gap between them verses us...it's very silly, and stupid.

We've been playing that silly game since the day we first set foot on this soil called earth.

Mind you, the dinosaurs trumped us...they were at it for millions of years.

Asteroid's to the rescue...yes please.


BOOM!!

[Walker]

Well of course my point is wrong...if it was not wrong then you wouldn't be right...would you?

Your point is wrong because it's based on a fantasy.

Your fantasy is: what is, should not be.

[Walker]

The truth of Life is ...

What is, is, exactly as it must be.
What was, had to be.
What will be, will have to be. That does not exclude trying.

You're welcome for this indulgence of time, this gift to you, to help you find your out the darkness of the ignorance you express. May you not waste it.

[Dontaskme]

Your fantasy is: what is, should not be.

Why is it a fantasy knowing that making nuclear weapons with the intent to use them to harm ourselves is a bad idea?

...why is that idea of mine, seen by you as my fantasy?

[Dontaskme]

The truth of Life is ...

What is, is, exactly as it must be.
What was, had to be.
What will be, will have to be. That does not exclude trying.

You're welcome for this indulgence of time, this gift to you, to help you find your out the darkness of the ignorance you express. May you not waste it.

No idea what that load of mush is supposed to mean..but hey ho, each to their own mush making machine.

[Dontaskme]

Well of course my point is wrong...if it was not wrong then you wouldn't be right...would you?

Your point is wrong because it's based on a fantasy.

Your fantasy is: what is, should not be.

When it rains..the rain does not deliberately rain on everyone's parade with intent.

I cannot stop the rain from falling, I have absolutely no control over whether it rains or not..it's raining and there is no way in hell I could ever wish that rain not to fall...the rain falling is what it is...and never what it is not...as in, it should not be raining..that's obvious. . so your stupid reply can only only relate to what we have no control over.

However, I'm sorry to inform you...that I do have control over whether I am harming another human being...that is the point being made which seems to fly straight over your stupid head because it's too busy soaring through the heavens..as if there's absolutely nothing to see here down on terra firma, so lets not get our panties in a pickle here, rather, lets stay on topic.

[Dontaskme]

1: What's the purpose or goal of NATO? ..right now on this day April 21st 2022

2: ''Who'' or ''What'' is NATO supposed to BE AT WAR with? .. or GO to war with? .. right now on this day April 21st 2022

Does anyone ever think about those questions?




____

If no country can WIN the battle that is WAR in April 2022 ...then what's the point of NATO? ...might as well just spend the money that is needed for WAR... on 'other' ways that will keep people warm in winter and making sure there is plenty of adequate shelter, food and water for people everywhere in the world...that seems like a better idea....but what the heck do I know...I'm just some dense person.

[Dontaskme]

The NATO treaty states that if an armed attack occurs against one of the member states, it shall be considered an attack against all members, and other members shall assist the attacked member, with armed forces if necessary. At it's core, the organisation acts as a collective security alliance with the aim of providing mutual defense.


But what about the people living in Ukraine ...surely an attack against one person is an attack against all people?

Why isn't Nato using it's armed forces to defend the Ukrainian people?

Again, Who or What is NATO supposed to go to WAR with? ..supposed to be at war with? ..or don't the people who are dying in Ukraine matter at all?

Lets not ignore the elephant in the living room...here