Most of those who countered the anti-CRTists [e.g. Randi Weingarten and many others] are relying on strawman.uwot wrote: ↑Wed Jul 07, 2021 8:00 amNo you bonehead! As it says in the article, Randi Weingarten, the president of the American Federation of Teachers "has already taken steps to distance her union from the divisive rhetoric, telling her members Tuesday that critical race theory isn’t taught in K-12 schools, but that "culture warriors are labeling any discussion of race, racism, or discrimination as CRT to try to make it toxic.""Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Wed Jul 07, 2021 4:29 amNote the recent declaration by the largest teachers the NEA backing Critical Race Theory to be taught in Schools.
Teachers’ Unions Vow to Defend Members in Critical Race Theory Fight
https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learnin ... ht/2021/07
Which is exactly what Rufo said he is trying to achieve. Do these words look familiar:Christopher Rufo wrote: ↑Tue Jun 29, 2021 7:24 amThe goal is to have the public read something crazy in the newspaper and immediately think "critical race theory." We have decodified the term and will recodify it to annex the entire range of cultural constructions that are unpopular with Americans. https://twitter.com/realchrisrufo/statu ... 96352?s=20
You are very ignorant of what is going on with the CRT issues and is without intellectual integrity and honesty.In order for you to exercise your much vaunted critical thinking skills, first you have to succeed at a little bit of basic comprehension.
Nobody is "backing Critical Race Theory to be taught in Schools."
What they are backing is teachers teaching American history, which includes slavery, segregation, the Ku Klux Klan and the fact that blacks are more likely to be stopped, arrested and killed by the police. You know, the truth.
Rufo wants historical facts to be associated with an easily remembered sound bite so that every such time issues are mentioned, the immediate response of fuckwits like you is to squawk 'Critical Race Theory!' rendering any meaningful conversation nearly impossible.
Show me one evidence the anti-CRTists are against
"teachers teaching American history, which includes slavery, segregation, the Ku Klux Klan and the fact that blacks are more likely to be stopped, arrested and killed by the police."
Show me one evidence,
Rufo wants historical facts to be associated with an easily remembered sound bite so that every such time issues are mentioned, it is associated with CRT.
I have not come across any anti-CRTist demanding that teachers do not teach the facts of American history of slavery and racism exactly as it it with its warts and all.
What the anti-CRTs are against are the toxic elements the overzealous CRTists that I had higjlighted in the OP. I have mentioned those many times, why are you ignoring it.
viewtopic.php?p=515524#p515524
Show me evidences those toxic elements of CRT are false and no [none at all] such views and ideas had been taught in K12 schools.
Btw, you have not argued with anything of substance and evidence, but merely making noises.