Calling All Liberal Race Baiters

Skepdick · Post by **Skepdick** » Mon Oct 26, 2020 6:55 pm

Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 6:54 pm Where is your "evidence"?

Whatever convinced you to spend your time/money/attention on a maybe-problem.

Immanuel Can · Post by **Immanuel Can** » Mon Oct 26, 2020 6:58 pm

Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 6:55 pm
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 6:54 pm Where is your "evidence"?
Whatever convinced you to spend your time/money/attention on a maybe-problem.

Deflection.

Where's your "evidence"?

henry quirk · Post by **henry quirk** » Mon Oct 26, 2020 7:04 pm

Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 6:58 pm
Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 6:55 pm
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 6:54 pm Where is your "evidence"?
Whatever convinced you to spend your time/money/attention on a maybe-problem.
Deflection.

Where's your "evidence"?

he has none beyond what he needs to further the tussle

he's a tussle-junkie

Immanuel Can · Post by **Immanuel Can** » Mon Oct 26, 2020 7:07 pm

henry quirk wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 7:04 pm he's a tussle-junkie

Too bad. He doesn't always seem incapable of rational discussion. He has moments of insight. But they go away quickly, because as you say, he's addicted to just being contrary.

He must feel he needs the attention, or something. He's not helping advance any thought process.

Skepdick · Post by **Skepdick** » Mon Oct 26, 2020 7:14 pm

henry quirk wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 7:04 pm he has none beyond what he needs to further the tussle

The evidence is staring you in the face.

Actions speak louder than words.

Watch what IC does, not what he says. He is DOING problem-solving.
While claiming to be uncertain about the existence of a problem.

henry quirk · Post by **henry quirk** » Mon Oct 26, 2020 7:15 pm

Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 7:07 pm
henry quirk wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 7:04 pm he's a tussle-junkie
Too bad. He doesn't always seem incapable of rational discussion. He has moments of insight. But they go away quickly, because as you say, he's addicted to just being contrary.

He must feel he needs the attention, or something. He's not helping advance any thought process.

I won't get into why he's a tussle-junkie (mostly cuz I don't care why)

all I (need to) know: he is a tussle-junkie and he's tiresome

henry quirk · Post by **henry quirk** » Mon Oct 26, 2020 7:16 pm

Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 7:14 pm
henry quirk wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 7:04 pm he has none beyond what he needs to further the tussle
The evidence is staring you in the face.

Actions speak louder than words.

Watch what IC does, not what he says.

He is DOING problem-solving.

yeah, I don't care, skep

you make me so tired I just don't care

Skepdick · Post by **Skepdick** » Mon Oct 26, 2020 7:17 pm

henry quirk wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 7:16 pm yeah, I don't care, skep

you make me so tired I just don't care

I can't help you there.

I showed it to you. I can't understand it for you.

Skepdick · Post by **Skepdick** » Mon Oct 26, 2020 7:20 pm

Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 6:58 pm Deflection.

Where's your "evidence"?

Your willingness to invest time/money/energy into "problem-confirming" a "maybe problem" is my evidence.

What convinced you to look into this "maybe-problem" and not other "maybe-problems"?

Immanuel Can · Post by **Immanuel Can** » Mon Oct 26, 2020 7:21 pm

Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 7:17 pm
henry quirk wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 7:16 pm yeah, I don't care, skep

you make me so tired I just don't care
I can't help you there.

I showed it to you. I can't understand it for you.

Notice: he's not presenting his alleged evidence. He's trying to tussle again, instead, so he won't have to say anything cogent.

And now I will venture an estimate of probability: his evidence probably doesn't exist.

Immanuel Can · Post by **Immanuel Can** » Mon Oct 26, 2020 7:22 pm

Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 7:20 pm Your willingness

Deflection.

Last call for your evidence.

henry quirk · Post by **henry quirk** » Mon Oct 26, 2020 7:22 pm

Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 7:17 pm
henry quirk wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 7:16 pm yeah, I don't care, skep

you make me so tired I just don't care
I can't help you there.

I showed it to you. I can't understand it for you.

don't care...go squabble with Mannie...he's the one wantin' your evidence, not me

commonsense · Post by **commonsense** » Mon Oct 26, 2020 7:26 pm

There is a problem.

A man in the custody of law enforcement died while law enforcement was applying force to the man.

That’s a problem.

commonsense · Post by **commonsense** » Mon Oct 26, 2020 7:31 pm

Multiple video clips revealed a man’s lifeless body while it was being restrained by a law enforcement officer.

Immanuel Can · Post by **Immanuel Can** » Mon Oct 26, 2020 7:37 pm

commonsense wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 7:26 pm There is a problem.

A man in the custody of law enforcement died while law enforcement was applying force to the man.

That’s a problem.

Okay. Let's start there.

WHY did he die?

Philosophy Now Forum

Calling All Liberal Race Baiters

Re: Calling All Liberal Race Baiters

Re: Calling All Liberal Race Baiters

Re: Calling All Liberal Race Baiters

Re: Calling All Liberal Race Baiters

Re: Calling All Liberal Race Baiters

Re: Calling All Liberal Race Baiters

Re: Calling All Liberal Race Baiters

Re: Calling All Liberal Race Baiters

Re: Calling All Liberal Race Baiters

Re: Calling All Liberal Race Baiters

Re: Calling All Liberal Race Baiters

Re: Calling All Liberal Race Baiters

Re: Calling All Liberal Race Baiters

I forgot to provide the evidence of a problem

Re: Calling All Liberal Race Baiters