The point is self-evident: the planet/human civilization is a patriarchal mess.
I'm sorry I don't take anything I read on the internet as authoritative
and know not to "believe" anything that comes from it.
The "believer vs. unbeliever" division underlies the geopolitical Left and Right.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sun Aug 16, 2020 3:07 pm It's not. Stalinists were "believers" in Communism (Leftist), and Libertarians (Rightist) are "unbelievers" in the same things. But Marxists (Leftists) are "non-believers" in free trade, and Capitalists (Rightists) are "believers" in it.
Unbelief and belief vary with the issue in question...they don't attach to "Left" and "Right."
It is because the former exists, the latter is a corollary. The problem is
people are made to "believe" in the daily propaganda nonsense they see
that is distracting from the real underlying war that has been fought now
for thousands of years: "believer vs. unbeliever". This is the division.
ANTIFA and BLM are movements designed/owned/operated by the House of IslamImmanuel Can wrote: ↑Sun Aug 16, 2020 3:07 pm Right now, they are the leaders of Leftists ideological groups like ANTIFA and BLM, as well as far too many academics in the Humanities. There are fewer in Business and the STEM fields, which attach more firmly to reality and data than the Humanities do, which have become seriously poisoned by Marxist ideology, and today teach very little deserving of the term "education." The Western press is also clearly heavily infected, but generally more stupidly and sometimes more strategically and politically than earnestly, it would seem.
in accordance with their goal to undermine/destroy the U.S. from the inside-out.
Again: there is only one war being fought, and it is Muslims vs. the non-Muslims
because Islam is the root of Nazism (composed of the real book-worshiping "Jews").
Nazism is more important now than ever - hundreds of millions of lives are at stake as
COVID-19 is another warfare agent designed to weaken the immune systems of "unbelieving" nations.
China is the 'scapegoat' - the "Jews" always need a scapegoat to distract others from the truth.
This is thoroughly false.
BLM is warfare-inspired by an ideology that has a true hatred for "white people".
They just use the blacks to do the dirty work. This is how/why the Liberal/Democratic parties
are nothing but an extension of the ideological House of Islam - the politicians are the puppets.
The Clintons, the Bushes, Obama, Trudeau etc. these are all "goyim" of the House of Islam.
The problem is traced back to / rooted in Islam viz. "belief"-based identity.
The division of "believer vs. unbeliever" underlies all such "secondary" divisions.
One must first understand the gravity of the motivation of the House of Islam:
for Islam dominate the world. This is why they manufacture problems:
to make themselves the (only) solution. They have been doing this for 1400 years
thus I would recommend first understanding the life of Muhammad (the idol of Islam), as
the Muslims practically re-live his life of subjugation and conquest over-and-over.
Islam is a cycle of this, thus you will be able to see for yourself that Islam is nothing
but the life of Muhammad on-repeat. This involves waging war against all "unbelievers"
and this is what we are seeing globally.
The particulars of any "belief" ultimately matter not.
One may know ALL thus: not to believe, or
one may believe ALL, thus not to know.
These are the only two "trees" and only one leads to all-knowing, as
it takes a "believer" to "believe" the opposite of what is true.
These two trees reflect in/as the "believer vs. unbeliever" division wherein
all belief-based ignorance(s) are pinned in/of the "believers" as
absence of "belief" may imply presence of (all) knowledge negating.
The presence of belief implies an absence of knowledge (and vice versa).
The difference is night and day.
Knowing the degrees of uncertainty surrounding any belief/hypothesis is knowledge.
Beliefs, assumptions etc. which are taken to be immutably 'true' without trial/testing/falsification
is what separates belief and knowledge, as the latter implies acknowledgement of any/all degrees of uncertainty.
A falsification is not a "belief" - it is a knowledge: to know what not to believe and/or further assume.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sun Aug 16, 2020 3:07 pm And it is always concluded by some "belief," called a "finding," because the sum of all experiments has never been completed for even one scientific question. Something must always be "believed" at the end, even if it's sometimes no more than the "belief" that the original hypothesis is wrong.
If one knows what a subject/object/particular is, one may know what not to "believe" it is. This is why
knowledge is the antithesis of belief: to know all not to believe must be a property of an all-knower,
Belief implies one or more degrees of uncertainty.
Knowledge implies the absence of uncertainty/doubt.
I certainly do not "believe" in mainstream science LOL.
I know (real) science works, however it is a discipline
that involves the willingness to challenge basic underlying assumptions.
This is true both individually 'conscience' and as a broader faculty of inquiry.
I don't "believe" things, no.
I don't accept anything unless
I know it can not not be so.
"Belief" implies there is no trial/testing/falsification, thus
no actual science(s) including conscience (consciousness).