Alinsky's Rules for Radicals

How should society be organised, if at all?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Locked
User avatar
Kayla
Posts: 1217
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 6:31 am

Re: Alinsky's Rules for Radicals

Post by Kayla »

uwot wrote: Fri Oct 05, 2018 2:05 pmThe American people voted for Trump,
he lost the popular vote, remember?
how democracy is supposed to work
when you have large groups that utterly reject some political party and its agenda, this is not a democracy

overwhelming majority of black women (among others) did not vote for trump, because his policies and his party have nothing to offer us. why should i care whether or not he was "democratically elected"?
Nick_A
Posts: 6208
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 1:23 am

Re: Alinsky's Rules for Radicals

Post by Nick_A »

Greta wrote: Fri Oct 05, 2018 6:30 am I am too stunned by the extraordinary lack of comprehension of my post to reply.

Forget it. I'm so bored with insincere game players like you lot.

Greta, you are a genuine progressive expert. Common sense has a disturbing effect on these people. Not good for their digestion.
User avatar
-1-
Posts: 2888
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 1:08 am

Re: Alinsky's Rules for Radicals

Post by -1- »

I guess it's no good to give poor people money, when they increase the money supply. The poor people will just spend it on drugs and booze.

It's much better to give gobs of money to the extremely rich. They use it wisely, like buying drugs and spirits of the finest quality.

The middle classes stay sober and calculating. They buy guns. On one hand to protect themselves from the poor who are driven to desperation for drugs, what with the cravings; and on the other hand, to prepare for the revolution when they line up all the extremely rich people against the wall and shoot them.
uwot
Posts: 6093
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:21 am

Re: Alinsky's Rules for Radicals

Post by uwot »

Kayla wrote: Fri Oct 05, 2018 2:56 pm
uwot wrote: Fri Oct 05, 2018 2:05 pmThe American people voted for Trump,
he lost the popular vote, remember?
True, but that's the rules.
Kayla wrote: Fri Oct 05, 2018 2:56 pm
how democracy is supposed to work
when you have large groups that utterly reject some political party and its agenda, this is not a democracy
Tragically, it is. When the popular vote loses, that is not democracy.
Kayla wrote: Fri Oct 05, 2018 2:56 pmoverwhelming majority of black women (among others) did not vote for trump, because his policies and his party have nothing to offer us. why should i care whether or not he was "democratically elected"?
Because the policies he introduces are going to fuck up a lot of lives. There is no better reason to care, and no better reason to fight.
uwot
Posts: 6093
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:21 am

Re: Alinsky's Rules for Radicals

Post by uwot »

-1- wrote: Fri Oct 05, 2018 3:31 pmI guess it's no good to give poor people money, when they increase the money supply. The poor people will just spend it on drugs and booze.
At least they don't waste it.
User avatar
henry quirk
Posts: 14706
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
Location: Right here, a little less busy.

Post by henry quirk »

"Debt is wealth. Do you think a billionaire has a stack of a billion dollar bills? Money is the promise to pay. If there is a promise to pay, then someone has to pay it. In the case of the US national debt, that means you and you won't get anything for it."

Keynes was a motherfucker.

In the Austrian system, debt is friggin' debt, and money is a placeholder for value (gold, energy, etc. [you don't get to print more to rejigger things]).

Again: Keynes was a motherfucker.

#

"I now invoke Quirk and declare ... Commie!"

Pretty much applies to 99% of the posters here.

Helicopter rides...just sayin'

#

"When the popular vote loses, that is not democracy."

The U.S. is not a democracy, by design.

The U.S. is a constitutional republic.

#

"he lost the popular vote, remember?"

Only in aggregate and it's uncertain by how much.

Here's the thing: we don't have a presidential election, we have 50 presidential elections. To total things up and declare 'he lost the popular' is nice for you but meaningless. Clinton won Calif., Trump won La., and so on.

Sovereign states forming a sovereign nation: people overlook the 'sovereign states' part.
uwot
Posts: 6093
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:21 am

Re:

Post by uwot »

henry quirk wrote: Fri Oct 05, 2018 3:50 pm...debt is friggin' debt, and money is a placeholder for value (gold, energy, etc. [you don't get to print more to rejigger things]).
The rich already have the gold and the energy; the 'etc' you refer to is you. You can tell them to fuck off, but you are a commodity that someone wants to make money from. That means debt. That means tax.
User avatar
henry quirk
Posts: 14706
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
Location: Right here, a little less busy.

you're right, cuz we follow the gospel according to keynes

Post by henry quirk »

As I say: Keynes was a motherfucker.
uwot
Posts: 6093
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:21 am

Re: you're right, cuz we follow the gospel according to keynes

Post by uwot »

henry quirk wrote: Fri Oct 05, 2018 4:57 pmAs I say: Keynes was a motherfucker.
Maybe, but he didn't sell you and your country to plutocrats.
User avatar
henry quirk
Posts: 14706
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
Location: Right here, a little less busy.

meh, keynes laid the groundwork for state-capitalists/sociliats to pull all manner of shit

Post by henry quirk »

This is not news.
Nick_A
Posts: 6208
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 1:23 am

Re: Alinsky's Rules for Radicals

Post by Nick_A »

"religion is the opium of the people" Karl Marx

Revolution is the opiate of the masses ~ Simone Weil


Alinsky supports Marx while those believing in the principles America was founded upon will support Simone's belief. The statist slavery furthered by Alinsky or the American ideals supporting freedom? I'll stick with Simone. I know what the other side is like.
uwot
Posts: 6093
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:21 am

Yeah, but...

Post by uwot »

henry quirk wrote: Fri Oct 05, 2018 5:17 pmmeh, keynes laid the groundwork for state-capitalists/sociliats to pull all manner of shit
People were shat on long before Keynes.
User avatar
-1-
Posts: 2888
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 1:08 am

Re: Yeah, but...

Post by -1- »

uwot wrote: Fri Oct 05, 2018 5:35 pm
henry quirk wrote: Fri Oct 05, 2018 5:17 pmmeh, keynes laid the groundwork for state-capitalists/sociliats to pull all manner of shit
People were shat on long before Keynes.
Humans, like almost all other species of animals living in social groups, do form hierarchical societies.

This was the promise of Marxism-Leninism: to eradicate hierarchies. And this is where they failed. You can't organize any positive human activity involving more than one person unless you build a hierarchical structure.

The Who, an energetic, working class, musical band, summed it up like this in their 1972 hit (and I cry every time I hear it), in "Won't Get Fool Again":

Meet the new boss!
Same as the old boss!

Why don't we organize a society with no human involvement in production and delivery of goods and services, to be done by drones and robots; and you eliminate hierarchy.

But you still won't eliminate anarchy. We are too wide-spread in our psychological make-up to form a uniform society. People will kill, maim, and murder for the sake of nothing else but to kill, maim and murder, or do the same to protest, or do the same to break the monotony.

Sorry, there is no Utopia for humans. We are a bunch of mainly mildly well-meaning church going socialists, but we can't eliminate from our midst (in our gene pool) the sadists, the disruptive people, the bored ones.
Last edited by -1- on Fri Oct 05, 2018 6:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
-1-
Posts: 2888
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 1:08 am

Re: Alinsky's Rules for Radicals

Post by -1- »

Nick_A wrote: Fri Oct 05, 2018 5:20 pm "religion is the opium of the people" Karl Marx

Revolution is the opiate of the masses ~ Simone Weil
I would actually categorize revolution as the poetry of the masses.

You will never cry a nostalgic, sentimental cry until you've experienced living through a revolution.

It is indeed an opiate, a misguiding but an ah so ever beautiful movement.
User avatar
henry quirk
Posts: 14706
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
Location: Right here, a little less busy.

"People were shat on long before Keynes."

Post by henry quirk »

Folks been gettin' shit on by other folks since before we fell out of the trees, Keynes is just part of a very long chain.

As I say: this ain't news.
Locked