vegetariantaxidermy wrote:'Statistics'
You would only cherry-pick the ones that suit you. …
Why am I not surprised you wouldn't answer. "Cherry-pick", you mean like checking how many immigrants are actually in your country, checking what your govts housing policy is towards working immigrants, discovering whether you are indigenous to your country and most importantly seeing if there is any correlation between this influx you talk about and the degradation of your environment, things like that you mean?
'Liberal-capitalist' haha. Is 'Neo-liberal' too 'Thatcherish' for you? Too discredited? Now I can see how you manage to come across as so unflappable and bland --PCtards and politicians have that in common. It's easy when you don't have a genuine bone in your body. Your smarmy 'national socialist' comments are cowardly and contemptible, but expected from a hypocritical PCtard who is used to throwing the 'r' word around but accepts that it has worn a bit thin. You are the Neo-liberal, yet call me 'right-wing'??? WTF? …
I see, so you can throw around words like 'retard'(how PC that you use euphemism for it and can't say the word "racist", by-the-by 'PCtard' used to mean a lover of PC's' as opposed to Macs but what the hey!) but you object to me using an accurate term for a socialist who is nationalistic and dislikes capitalism? You are claiming you're a socialist are you not, as I'd be surprised that a Liberal was opposed to capitalism.
As it happens, a very large percentage of the immigrant vote is going to the party that promotes Big Business/anti-people interests i.e. the 'Neo-liberal' one-- tipping the balance in our elections. …
State your country so I can fact check your assertions.
So, your beloved 'pro-capitalist' type of Govt. has landed us with the biggest debt in our history, while doing nothing of benefit (quite the opposite) to the people of the country. How do you think that works? A pro-privatisation, supposedly 'capitalist' Govt. that 'cuts costs' (no cuts for admins though) yet ends up with record debt and the highest rate of homelessness per capita in the Western world. Call me stupid, but that doesn't look like terribly good 'money-management' to me. …
Who said I was Conservative?
Where? You keep harping on about 'retraining schemes'. For what? Who conducts them? Do builders 'retrain' themselves to compete with inferior cheap builders? …
Er!? Can't you read or do you just keep those blinkers on? I said retrain the workers to do the new jobs or do you just like keeping people in back-breaking labour or is it that you just think them too stupid or too old to retrain?
I've already pointed out that it has nothing to do with lack of skills. Which part didn't you understand? …
I know, it's got to do with not wanting to work at the going market-rate. But I am a touch confused here as you said 'low-skilled' workers were your concern?
Perhaps next you will suggest 'team-building' schemes, and 'group hug' sessions. …
No, I'd suggest things like remote data server management, pays loads more and can be done from anywhere and is out of the rain.
A lot of these imports are white South Africans swarming in to escape black rule in their own country. …
Yeah, the Yah-yah's were on the building sites here for a while but they upped and moved on to better things mainly through retraining.
They don't, however, leave behind their fascist politics so they go with the closest thing to it over here--the party with the 'Neo-liberal' politics that invited them here. And Chinese and Indians aren't exactly known for their 'left' wing politics, tolerance, and desire to care for the underdog and vulnerable, whereas Polynesian immigrants assimilate well and their politics suit the character of the country. …
Which country is that?
So spare me the 'race' card and stop confusing politics with 'race' (a typical political ploy of every PCtard). …
Back to the 'retard' again I see. Where have I mentioned 'race' in this conversation?
Btw, you know it annoys me when you respond in 'dissection-mode' but you keep doing it. …
You write a whole paragraph that hangs together then I'll respond to it but until then I'll respond to your points as you raise them as in a real conversation that'd be the way it goes.
This indicates a self-centred person who is indifferent to others, even if those 'others' are only other members of an internet forum.
Does it, you a psychology graduate now? If so spare your psychobabble for those who care. Me, I just have one conversation at a time, respond to the points and it makes it easier to track back the conversation rather than this ridiculous habit of requoting the whole post or cutting and only responding to what one wishes, although I am guilty of the latter if I'm following others conversations and see a point that strikes me as questionable or interesting.