FFS. Please stop giving historical figures modern PC labels and concepts. It's just moronic.GreatandWiseTrixie wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2017 9:27 pmGhengis khan was a dragon who raped and pillaged the village. He would get the first choice of women to rape, the women obeyed his every command.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2017 6:41 pmI was referring to the other bit. But since you mentioned it, what do you mean Ghengis Khan was a rapist? Next you will be saying that Alexander the Great was a transgender lesbian.GreatandWiseTrixie wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2017 5:12 pm
Ghengis Khan was real, not a fairy tale.
Also many stories in the Bible are true. King David actually existed. Like Fake News, they have to put some real events in it so you buy the bullshit.
There were some transsexual emperors, one of the Caesers was trans and there was another ancient trans dictator, nobody liked tho, because they pillaged the village too many times. I hear Alexander the Great might have been gay or bi, but never heard he was trans.
Do Republicans and pedophile priests share the same vile sexual morality.
- vegetariantaxidermy
- Posts: 13983
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
- Location: Narniabiznus
Re: Do Republicans and pedophile priests share the same vile sexual morality.
- GreatandWiseTrixie
- Posts: 1547
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2015 9:51 pm
Re: Do Republicans and pedophile priests share the same vile sexual morality.
You're the one trying to be PC by disbelieving Ghengis Khan was a rapist.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2017 9:38 pmFFS. Please stop giving historical figures modern PC labels and concepts. It's just moronic.GreatandWiseTrixie wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2017 9:27 pmGhengis khan was a dragon who raped and pillaged the village. He would get the first choice of women to rape, the women obeyed his every command.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2017 6:41 pm
I was referring to the other bit. But since you mentioned it, what do you mean Ghengis Khan was a rapist? Next you will be saying that Alexander the Great was a transgender lesbian.
There were some transsexual emperors, one of the Caesers was trans and there was another ancient trans dictator, nobody liked tho, because they pillaged the village too many times. I hear Alexander the Great might have been gay or bi, but never heard he was trans.
- vegetariantaxidermy
- Posts: 13983
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
- Location: Narniabiznus
Re: Do Republicans and pedophile priests share the same vile sexual morality.
It's not a matter of 'disbelieving' or 'believing'. Is there any particular reason to take your word for anything? Perhaps he was. Perhaps he wasn't. It's still moronic to use today's standards to judge someone so far back in history. Most of the English monarchs have been sadistic murderers. Was everyone who attended public torture and executions (most of the public) a 'sadistic psychopath'? Perhaps that's the default position with humans. No one knows.GreatandWiseTrixie wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2017 9:58 pmYou're the one trying to be PC by disbelieving Ghengis Khan was a rapist.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2017 9:38 pmFFS. Please stop giving historical figures modern PC labels and concepts. It's just moronic.GreatandWiseTrixie wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2017 9:27 pm
Ghengis khan was a dragon who raped and pillaged the village. He would get the first choice of women to rape, the women obeyed his every command.
There were some transsexual emperors, one of the Caesers was trans and there was another ancient trans dictator, nobody liked tho, because they pillaged the village too many times. I hear Alexander the Great might have been gay or bi, but never heard he was trans.
Re: Do Republicans and pedophile priests share the same vile sexual morality.
Have you stopped beating your wife?
- GreatandWiseTrixie
- Posts: 1547
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2015 9:51 pm
Re: Do Republicans and pedophile priests share the same vile sexual morality.
Yeah its called google it for yourself.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2017 10:56 pmIt's not a matter of 'disbelieving' or 'believing'. Is there any particular reason to take your word for anything? Perhaps he was. Perhaps he wasn't. It's still moronic to use today's standards to judge someone so far back in history. Most of the English monarchs have been sadistic murderers. Was everyone who attended public torture and executions (most of the public) a 'sadistic psychopath'? Perhaps that's the default position with humans. No one knows.GreatandWiseTrixie wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2017 9:58 pmYou're the one trying to be PC by disbelieving Ghengis Khan was a rapist.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Mon Nov 20, 2017 9:38 pm
FFS. Please stop giving historical figures modern PC labels and concepts. It's just moronic.