Why are bombs OK, but guns bad?

How should society be organised, if at all?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

User avatar
Arising_uk
Posts: 12313
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am

Re: Why are bombs OK, but guns bad?

Post by Arising_uk »

Actually I think we don't give a toss about how you kill yourselves over there Henry, or at least I don't, and I can well understand why people wish to have a gun but bob keeps on raising this issue on a non-American forum and I keep wondering why?
bobevenson
Posts: 7349
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
Contact:

Re: Why are bombs OK, but guns bad?

Post by bobevenson »

Arising_uk wrote:Bob keeps on raising this issue on a non-American forum and I keep wondering why?
Because I know I can hold my own against you stupid foreigners!
User avatar
henry quirk
Posts: 9332
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm

Post by henry quirk »

Seems to me there's a whole criticism comin' from folks who (claim to) don't give a shit, so - sorry - I don't buy into the indifference act...as for Bob: he's harmless and loud...that so many look to counter him sez way more about them than him.

Again: too many folks with too much time on their hands.
bobevenson
Posts: 7349
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
Contact:

Re:

Post by bobevenson »

henry quirk wrote:As for Bob: he's harmless...
Destroying egos is harmless?
User avatar
henry quirk
Posts: 9332
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm

Post by henry quirk »

Bob, I like you and don't wanna fight with you.

If you believe you're "destroying egos" then have at it.
User avatar
Hobbes' Choice
Posts: 8364
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am

Re: Why are bombs OK, but guns bad?

Post by Hobbes' Choice »

BigWhit wrote:Did you read the quote in that post, Leo or are you just blind to implicit assertions that agree with your ideas?

HC, the day I take lessons on my constitution from a socialist limey fuckwit like you is the day I'll cut my dick off and call myself Caitlyn Jenner. If the second amendment only applies to muskets then I guess the first amendment applies to quill pens and presses only? .
And it is THIS sort of fucking Trump-ass sniffing moron that I am talking about.
User avatar
Hobbes' Choice
Posts: 8364
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am

Re: Why are bombs OK, but guns bad?

Post by Hobbes' Choice »

BigWhit wrote:.(you have to be 21 to own a handgun in the US) ..
....

Even morons acknowledge gun control; shame they can't think it through.
BigWhit
Posts: 139
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 7:20 pm

Re: Why are bombs OK, but guns bad?

Post by BigWhit »

Hold on while I report tour posts to be censored, HC, because the freedom of speech doesn't apply to the mass communications network that is the interwebz.

Ha! Trump ass sniffing? Hahahaha! Be more clueless. I dare you.
BigWhit
Posts: 139
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 7:20 pm

Re: Why are bombs OK, but guns bad?

Post by BigWhit »

Hobbes' Choice wrote:
BigWhit wrote:.(you have to be 21 to own a handgun in the US) ..
....

Even morons acknowledge gun control; shame they can't think it through.
Says the guy who posted the picture of that control clearly not working.
bobevenson
Posts: 7349
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
Contact:

Re:

Post by bobevenson »

henry quirk wrote:If you believe you're "destroying egos" then have at it.
Actually, I was thinking of a hand of liar's poker I played once. I actually did destroy the collective egos of the other players with a single bid because we didn't play another hand after that.
User avatar
Hobbes' Choice
Posts: 8364
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am

Re: Why are bombs OK, but guns bad?

Post by Hobbes' Choice »

BigWhit wrote:
Hobbes' Choice wrote:
BigWhit wrote:.(you have to be 21 to own a handgun in the US) ..
....

Even morons acknowledge gun control; shame they can't think it through.
Says the guy who posted the picture of that control clearly not working.
If you had half the brain you think you have, you'd have realised that any fucking kid can get gold of a gun because any adult moron, like you can get a gun, and morons like you are too stupid to prevent guns getting in the hands of children.
And morons like you think that because some controls don't work you should get rid of all controls.
And I suppose that because your democracy has failed you might as well adopt anarchy. Yeah! vote TRUMP!

Fact is that in the USA guns are within the reach of any child. And your fucking argument is to end gun control?
Do you know why I think you are a fucking moron?
BigWhit
Posts: 139
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 7:20 pm

Re: Why are bombs OK, but guns bad?

Post by BigWhit »

Uh, huh. My guns have never been in the hands of a child and in the rural areas where I grew up we were taught the dangers of weapons from a very young age. Result? None of us ever fucked around with guns like a dumbass. No one I know ever shot anyone by accident or on purpose. It's a called being educated about weapons. Just like sex ed can help people avoid STDs and unwanted pregnancies, gun education can help prevent people from being gun phobic little fuckwits like you.

Keep acting like you know me and my life from across an ocean and through a fucking computer screen.
User avatar
Arising_uk
Posts: 12313
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am

Re: Why are bombs OK, but guns bad?

Post by Arising_uk »

bobevenson wrote:Because I know I can hold my own against you stupid foreigners!
There's nothing to hold you loon, we don't care about your infantile needs.
Last edited by Arising_uk on Wed Feb 24, 2016 9:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Arising_uk
Posts: 12313
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am

Re:

Post by Arising_uk »

henry quirk wrote:Seems to me there's a whole criticism comin' from folks who (claim to) don't give a shit, so - sorry - I don't buy into the indifference act...
*Shrug*
Obvious Leo
Posts: 4007
Joined: Wed May 13, 2015 1:05 am
Location: Australia

Re: Why are bombs OK, but guns bad?

Post by Obvious Leo »

What about anthrax, Bob. I've never actually held a gun so it wouldn't be my weapon of choice, but I know my way around a biological laboratory better than the average punter. If I put my mind to it I'm pretty sure I could make myself a flask of anthrax bacteria which would be many orders of magnitude more lethal than the most sophisticated of guns. Would the AEP protect my basic human right to do this if I so chose?
Post Reply