The sick mind of Noam Chomsky
Posted: Wed May 13, 2015 3:26 am
For the discussion of all things philosophical, especially articles in the magazine Philosophy Now.
https://forum.philosophynow.org/
Arising_uk wrote:And yet you ape Bill's formatting?
He provides it, so he must think it has a function, but I can understand why a dum-dum like you asks such a stupid question.Arising_uk wrote:Why? Is he forcing you to use it?
"Anti-American Hate"? So anyone questioning the propaganda disseminated by the US is "Anti-American"? To me, this enitre article is nothing but emotional slanging on part of Horowitz, and the usual propaganda spewed by mass media to pigeon-hole dissenters into 'terrorists'.Melchior wrote:http://www.salon.com/2001/09/26/treason_2/
Please elaborate on this so-called propaganda disseminated by the American government.WanderingLands wrote:So anyone questioning the propaganda disseminated by the US is "Anti-American"?
Been doing so for a while now since on this forum, mentioning for example the ISIS propaganda narrative, which was unfortunately deleted; along with that, COINTELPRO, September 11th, War on Terror. Let's also include a fuller range of U.S. Interventions to cover more of their foreign policy.bobevenson wrote:Please elaborate on this so-called propaganda disseminated by the American government.
Don't hide behind that crap you just posted, spell out the specific "propaganda" you're talking about!WanderingLands wrote:Been doing so for a while now since on this forum, mentioning for example the ISIS propaganda narrative, which was unfortunately deleted; along with that, COINTELPRO, September 11th, War on Terror. Let's also include a fuller range of U.S. Interventions to cover more of their foreign policy.bobevenson wrote:Please elaborate on this so-called propaganda disseminated by the American government.
How come you don't use all the formatting functions then boob? Just the one that lets you SHOUT!bobevenson wrote:He provides it, so he must think it has a function, but I can understand why a dum-dum like you asks such a stupid question.Arising_uk wrote:Why? Is he forcing you to use it?
What 'propaganda'? The author accuses Chomsky of being intellectually bankrupt, dishonest, etc. I agree with the author. I am appalled that Philosophy Now has honored him.WanderingLands wrote:"Anti-American Hate"? So anyone questioning the propaganda disseminated by the US is "Anti-American"? To me, this enitre article is nothing but emotional slanging on part of Horowitz, and the usual propaganda spewed by mass media to pigeon-hole dissenters into 'terrorists'.Melchior wrote:http://www.salon.com/2001/09/26/treason_2/
The propaganda that Horowitz repeats in that article; that anyone that questions the US government's foreign policy is basically considered to be 'anti-American', or 'in support of terrorism'.Melchior wrote: What 'propaganda'? The author accuses Chomsky of being intellectually bankrupt, dishonest, etc. I agree with the author. I am appalled that Philosophy Now has honored him.