Iceland wants to ban Internet porn

[Arising_uk]

This your idea of an original thought?

[homegrown]

Hey, i thought that was quite funny! no?

[Arising_uk]

Its why I smiled but it seems to conflict with your introduction.

[Bill Wiltrack]

.











.......................................................................................












Actually, one of the characteristics that I am championing is to be less judgmental; more right brain thinking.


This forum has been locked into a left-brain linear scope of thinking for soooo long that our characters and our characterizations have become stale.


That is one of the reasons that I appreciated your appearance and your use of video.

AND the fact that you had the balls to take-on ALL ACTIVE MEMBERS here at the Philosophy Now Forums all at the same time - right out of the box.





Well done!









However, that being said, your opinion is always appreciated.






.

[Arising_uk]

...
That is one of the reasons that I appreciated your appearance and your use of video.

Pop Quiz: What are the two major differences between homegrown's and Bill Wiltrack's videos?

[bobevenson]

Wiltrack has never actually said anything on any thread at any time. His idea of a forum is to cut and paste things totally unrelated to the subject.

[Bill Wiltrack]

.






...............................................................................................................................................How Do You Figure?


.................................................................................................................................















.

[bobevenson]

The Wiltrack saga continues, meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

[SpheresOfBalance]

Although people have different views on pornography, one thing is absolutely clear, it is not the function of government to stick its oppressive nose into it.

In your view, does the government have any function at all?

The only proper function of government is social integration, like a traffic cop keeping people from running over each other, unlike your view of the government running over the people!

It's pointless arguing with you when you make moronic comments like you do.


Now take a look at the vid I linked and answer my question.

Only an idiot adds 2 and 2 and gets 5. You are a lazy shite that wants the world to handle your responsibilities, because you're either too stupid or lethargic. How ones child ends up is the PARENTS fault and NOT the WORLDS. God help your children, Oh that's right you don't have a god, no wonder you have your head up your arse. You don't want to live by the laws of a loving GOD just a greedy GOD.

I had, so called, Internet Porn in my home and my child had his own computer, connected to the internet, but he never used it to watch IP because I ensured he didn't. If my child did anything I didn't approve of, he either got extreme exercise or some truth. Truth was a wooden paddle, just like the ones used on my ass, by the schools I attended, ran by the government, when I was a youngster, with truth written on it in huge letters. Needless to say when he left home to start on his own, he had a six-pack that wouldn't quit, you could bounce anvils off it. Boy did I do him a favor, he'll probably live to be 110, at least his body will, his mind I worry about though, that is if he ever listens to shites like you.

I watched your stupid little vid, which was a dumb thing to ask one of us adults to do, as I laughed my ass off, not because of what a moron might see, but rather the truth, i.e., that it was a joke with respect to reality, I could clearly see that only Hollywood has the money to do real special effects depicting violence, which is of a much higher quality, that I assume you'd let your children see, and most of the time I laugh at them too, again, not because of what morons see. I can smell theatrics a mile away, I don't care if a CRAY was used to do the CG. Dumb indeed to ask an adult to watch such a poorly acted/faked scene. I wasn't shocked because I was laughing too hard at the dumb shit, director, cinematographer, sound man, screenwriter, actors, etc, that is if you could really call them that. I don't know what you saw, I guess you don't see many videos. I saw it as a comedy, A spoof on backyard film making, of course the actors were healthy enough.

It's not a question as to whether one wants their child to watch such videos or not, of course they don't. The question is who's really responsible for your children? Did the government copulate with your wife, yielding your children? NO!!! then it's not their responsibility to watch out for them. Here's a novel concept for irresponsible people like you, IT'S YOURS!!!!

I hate people that want to be spoon fed everything, like some sort of invalid. If you are one that's a different story entirely. I'll come over and help you by configuring your kids PC to only allow them to see what you want them to.

Some people are just so lethargic, it's not funny. They think that all they got to do is knock up some female and their work is done. Pathetic!!!! For shame, you as a parent. The world is a dangerous place my friend, better lock them up in a inconel cage with bullet proof glass.

I can't believe you tried to badger Bob into answering that stupid question. As if it could possible make your case.

How about we make war illegal, god forbid they see/be apart of some real killing as seen on the nightly news. Would you allow your children to see faces of death? Do you want them to be trained to shoot guns, so as to blast someones brains all over the place, realizing that they are the same type of target, oh yeah, I guess you would, so long as they were saving you, as you sit lazily at home, expecting your local government, to stop them from seeing IP, as it might damage their psyche.

Edit: Spelling

[Arising_uk]

Answer to pop quiz:

Homegrown created his video and expressed a philosophical position. Whereas Bill Wiltrack...

[Bill Wiltrack]

.




I think I define my philosophical positions, possibly often in too much depth.







...................................................................................................


I use other peoples GIFs, which works well for me. This practice forces me to move out of my self. I am forced to feel a reaching; an empathy towards others in my posts.

When you think about it, from a distance, our thoughts our views aren't really ours. Not really us.

It thinks. It sees.




I do like the making & use of personal videos here on the Philosophy Now Forums. I think this, in some form, will be the future of posts upon this and many other forums.




.

[bobevenson]

It sure beats rational thought.

[Arising_uk]

I think I define my philosophical positions, possibly often in too much depth.

I think you live in a world of delusion.

I use other peoples GIFs, which works well for me. This practice forces me to move out of my self. I am forced to feel a reaching; an empathy towards others in my posts.

Shame you don't empathize with the women on this forum.

When you think about it, from a distance, our thoughts our views aren't really ours. Not really us.

It thinks. It sees.

Nah! Thats just you avoiding having to think about your thoughts.

I do like the making & use of personal videos here on the Philosophy Now Forums. I think this, in some form, will be the future of posts upon this and many other forums.

It already is on social networks like wastebook and meTube, fun it might be but I doubt such a hard of thought approach will catch on on philosophy forums, as those who visit these like to think and communicate with words as they have more finesse.

[SpheresOfBalance]

I think I define my philosophical positions, possibly often in too much depth.

I think you live in a world of delusion.

I use other peoples GIFs, which works well for me. This practice forces me to move out of my self. I am forced to feel a reaching; an empathy towards others in my posts.

Shame you don't empathize with the women on this forum.
Good question! I'll assume you meant it as a question, because I'm not sure that you know, in fact, that this is the case, as follows:

Hey Bill has any woman here on PNF spoke to you directly, of their feelings, thoughts, or attitudes in such a way, that you identified intellectually or experienced them vicariously? As surely individual feelings, thoughts, and attitudes are to be assessed on a case by case basis, as they are not necessarily universal, but rather relative.

When you think about it, from a distance, our thoughts our views aren't really ours. Not really us.

It thinks. It sees.

Nah! Thats just you avoiding having to think about your thoughts.

I do like the making & use of personal videos here on the Philosophy Now Forums. I think this, in some form, will be the future of posts upon this and many other forums.

It already is on social networks like wastebook and meTube, fun it might be but I doubt such a hard of thought approach will catch on on philosophy forums, as those who visit these like to think and communicate with words as they have more finesse.

[Bill Wiltrack]

.



I appreciate what you are saying and I concur.


Men & women are treated as equals upon this forum.



Quite frankly, I most often do not assume sex of any member here for often individuals may choose to take upon a false sexual orientation in addition to taking on a false name or title.




.