Two ways to God Particle.

[socratus]

Two ways to God Particle.
1
One way to find God Particle is CERN.
The result of the CERN experiment can be received
only in the reference frame of vacuum.
The vacuum is the most important part of CERN.
2
Another way to find God Particle takes its beginning
from QED. QED says: all electron parameters in
interaction with vacuum become infinite. But this is
forbidden by " The Law of Conservation and
Transformation of Energy". Question:
How the electron will regenerate from the vacuum?
3
So, CERN and QED cannot exist without vacuum.
Questions: What is vacuum: T=0K ?
Which kind of particles can exist in T=0K condition?
4
I say, that Third Law of Thermodynamics gives the answer:
the particles in T=0K condition don’t have volume and
therefore they must be flat circle/ disc particles: c/d=pi=3,14 . . .
And if vacuum is some kind of energy space – so the particles
also must be some kind of energy particles with potential
energy: E=Mc^2.
And if vacuum is some kind of thermodynamics space – so
the particles must have potential gravity mass: R/N=k.

And when I posted my opinion I received emails from some
persons with Ph.D in their pockets: idiot, moron, cretin . . .
. . . drink your cup of hemlock.
5
Where is my mistake?
6
On my opinion, to search God Particle using CERN
is mad project. It is better ( and maybe it is cheaper too)
to understand: What is electron?
How the electron regenerates from the vacuum?
And if we understand what electron is, we will also
understand that CERN is the big pyramid in the XXIc.
=====================.
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik Socratus
==================.

[Arising_uk]

Hi socratus,
I pretty much know that I have fuck-all idea of what you are arguing about with your fellow 'physicists'? But I really liked Feynman's QED as a book for the non-scientific but philosophical. So, your argument is that CERN can find the 'god partcle' but its an expensive way to do it? What is your experiment that would 'prove' your result? Apart from hemlock that is.

As an aside, did you see that article in New Scientist that postulated a cheap experiment that would unify a 'fuzz' in experiment and confirm a 'holographic' concept of 'spacetime' 'bits'?

Also, can you explain 2, 3, an 4 a bit simpler to the unscientific?
p.s.
Not that I understand or disagree with what you are saying, as I don't.

[mrblue]

I think it would be fitting for Socratus to drink the hemlock. It's almost as if history prophesied its occurrence. Perhaps Moses spoke with the God particle, asking it to spare Socratus, but because Socratus violated almost every law of classical physics he must inevitably pay the price and submit to the demands of the God particle in Reimannian hyper-Judeo-Christian space. But this is only a theory, for which I've received much criticism and feel totally convinced about.

[socratus]

Socratus violated almost every law of classical physics .

Excuse me.
I didn’t violate any formula or law of classical or quantum physics.
I also didn’t invent any new formula or law.
I only put one formula after another and this chain describes,
on my opinion, the SCHEME of Genesis:
1
There is a Vacuum some kind of Infinite/ Eternal
Energy Space in the condition: T = 0K
2
According to Quantum Theory this Infinite/ Eternal Energy
Space creates ‘ virtual energetic particles – frozen light quanta ’
They are in the rest/ potential condition and have following
physical parameters:
Geometrical form : C/D = pi
Potential mass : R/N=k
Potential energy : E = Mc^2
Inner impulse : h = 0
Mathematical formula : i^2= -1
3
Moving Quantum of Light is a Photon

Planck: h =E/t h = 1, c=1.
Einstein: h =kb h =1, c =1
4
Quantum of Light/ Photon as an Electron

Goudsmit-Uhlenbeck: h* = h/2pi , c>1
E = h*f
Sommerfeld: e^2 = h*ca (Electron)
The Lorentz transformations
5
Star formation:
e- -> k -> He II -> He I -> rotating He –> plasma reaction -
- -> thermonuclear reaction: ( P. Kapitza , L. Landau,
E.L. Andronikashvili theories )
( Theories of superconductivity and superfluidity.)
a) h*f > kT
b) h*f = kT
c) kT > h*f
6
As result of Star formation Proton was created
p ( Proton)
7
Evolution of interaction between Electron and Proton:
a) electromagnetic
b) nuclear
c) biological
8
The Laws:
a) The Law of conservation and transformation energy/ mass
b) The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle / Law
c) The Pauli Exclusion Principle/ Law
9.
Every theory must be tested logically ( theoretical ) and practically
a) Theory : Dualism of Consciousness: (consciousness/ subconsciousness)
b) Practice : Parapsychology . Meditation
==================================== .
#
And you can say :
the number 1 or 5 or any other is wrong because . . . . .
=======.
S.

[Impenitent]

monads monads everywhere
and all the boards did shrink

-Imp

[ray]

Two ways to God Particle.
1
One way to find God Particle is CERN.
The result of the CERN experiment can be received
only in the reference frame of vacuum.
The vacuum is the most important part of CERN.
2
Another way to find God Particle takes its beginning
from QED. QED says: all electron parameters in
interaction with vacuum become infinite. But this is
forbidden by " The Law of Conservation and
Transformation of Energy". Question:
How the electron will regenerate from the vacuum?
3
So, CERN and QED cannot exist without vacuum.
Questions: What is vacuum: T=0K ?
Which kind of particles can exist in T=0K condition?
4
I say, that Third Law of Thermodynamics gives the answer:
the particles in T=0K condition don’t have volume and
therefore they must be flat circle/ disc particles: c/d=pi=3,14 . . .
And if vacuum is some kind of energy space – so the particles
also must be some kind of energy particles with potential
energy: E=Mc^2.
And if vacuum is some kind of thermodynamics space – so
the particles must have potential gravity mass: R/N=k.

And when I posted my opinion I received emails from some
persons with Ph.D in their pockets: idiot, moron, cretin . . .
. . . drink your cup of hemlock.
5
Where is my mistake?
6
On my opinion, to search God Particle using CERN
is mad project. It is better ( and maybe it is cheaper too)
to understand: What is electron?
How the electron regenerates from the vacuum?
And if we understand what electron is, we will also
understand that CERN is the big pyramid in the XXIc.

=====================.
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik Socratus
==================.

I think you are closing in on to something there.

I have read your theory carefully.

Your logic is sound and your scientific method correct.

By God, you even gave here a clue to the size of the God Particle.

Excellent thinking there Israel Sadovnik Socratus.

[Arising_uk]

Hi Socratus,
If possible do you think you could put a key to the constants you use, as whilst I still don't think I'll understand the argument, at least the equations may make some sense. E.g. T = 'temperature', K = 'Kelvin'?, c = 'speed of light', ...etc

Does " * " mean 'multiply? And " ^ " 'raised to the power of'?

What does the " - -> " mean?

What does the " * " mean in this "h* = h/2pi "

[socratus]

Elementary particles . . . . ?.
The elementary particles are not as simple as we think.
#
The world of electron.
#
But maybe these electrons are World,
where there are five continents:
the art,
knowledge,
wars,
thrones
and the memory of forty centuries.
/ Valery Brusov. /
#
‘ . . , to start with every molecule as s living thing, . .’
/ Samuel Butler. /
===.
Is an electron, atom, molecule a living thing?
Does an electron, atom, molecule have consciousness ?
Molecular biology and molecular evolution.
Cosmology and cosmic evolution.
Can an electron, atom, molecule evolve?
Does evolution of life begin on electron’s ( atom’s ) level?
Does somebody have doubts that Genesis begin on electron’s ( atom’s ) level?
The origin of life is a natural result of the physical laws that govern the Universe.
Electron takes important part in this work.
If the Universe evolves, can electron evolve too?
===.
P.S.
In our earthly world there is only one elementary fundamental particle.
And it is quantum of light / photon / electron.
The quantum of light / photon / electron is not as simple as we think.
==========.
I. Socratus.

[Cerveny]

It is necessary to understand electrons (elementary particle at all) in context of the vacuum, of the physical space. Elementary particle is a structural defect of its regular structure. Such defects raise elastic tensions of the space ("physical fields"), shifts of defect’s neighbors...