What is the Source of the Universe ?

How does science work? And what's all this about quantum mechanics?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

User avatar
Cerveny
Posts: 767
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 9:35 pm
Location: Czech Republic
Contact:

Re: What is the Source of the Universe ?

Post by Cerveny »

socratus wrote:What is the Source of the Universe ?
...
The Physics first of all is Aether / Vacuum.
Vacuum is the Source of the Universe .
Vacuum is the Absolute Reference Frame.
Without Eternal and Infinite Vacuum Physics makes no sense.
You maybe know my opinion: elementary articles are defects, disorders in regular structure of vacuum (aether, physical space) but I have problem with an "Infinity" and "eternality" at all :(
As a source of growing, crystallizing referencing aether I consider the "outside" of the Universe - not ordered (yet), odd causal Future :)
User avatar
socratus
Posts: 628
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 7:00 am
Location: Israel
Contact:

Re: What is the Source of the Universe ?

Post by socratus »

Our knowledge.

Quantum of light (photon) is a point.
Electron is a point/ sphere.
Proton is a point / sphere.
They created an (point / sphere) atom.
The atoms form :
a) stars . . .planet,
b) cells . . . . life.
All the rest are trivialities.
==.
Question.
Why does Physics have many branches which
don’t incorporate and doesn’t have Unified theory?

=============.
converge
Posts: 113
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 1:18 am

Re: What is the Source of the Universe ?

Post by converge »

socratus wrote:Our knowledge.

Quantum of light (photon) is a point.
Electron is a point/ sphere.
Proton is a point / sphere.
They created an (point / sphere) atom.
This isn't really true... Photons, electrons, and protons aren't points or spheres. They're primarily waves and probability "clouds", that act like points when they interact with certain things. The electron around a hydrogen nucleus is sort of a dumbell-shaped probability function, for example.
==.
Question.
Why does Physics have many branches which
don’t incorporate and doesn’t have Unified theory?
=============.
Mostly because we haven't figured out the specifics of gravity and decoherence yet. We have "normal" physics, or Newtonian physics, which deal with average, everyday objects at average, everyday sizes/speeds/times. But then we discovered that things get weird at really large distances/speeds/times, and that's when relativity stepped in. Then we discovered that things get weird at really small distances/speeds/times, and that's when quantum physics stepped in. The problem is that things that have a huge and obvious effects at the giant relativistic scale, like gravity, have almost no obvious effects at the tiny quantum scale. Similarly, things that have a huge and obvious effect at the tiny quantum scale, like the probability waves and Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, have almost no obvious effects at the large relativistic scale. Trying to figure out how things all come together at the three different scales is a big part of what modern physicists work on.
Post Reply