bahman wrote: ↑Wed Jun 30, 2021 9:16 pm
Age wrote: ↑Wed Jun 30, 2021 7:37 am
bahman wrote: ↑Tue Jun 29, 2021 7:54 pm
Thinking.
I found KNOWING to be FAR MORE IMPORTANT then THINKING ever was, or ever would be.
But you need to think in order to know unless you are omniscient. Are you claiming that you are omniscient?
No. WHY would a 'you' even THINK or ASSUME such a thing?
And, when that body kicks its toe, do 'you' then need to THINK, and wonder if, "it hurts" BEFORE 'you' KNOW 'it hurts'?
Can NOT the feeling or sensory receptors KNOW some thing, BEFORE 'you' begin to even START THINKING some thing?
And, WHY do 'you' PRESUME that one HAS TO KNOW EVERY thing before they can just KNOW some thing WITHOUT before first NEEDING to THINK?
bahman wrote: ↑Wed Jun 30, 2021 9:16 pm
Age wrote: ↑Wed Jun 30, 2021 7:37 am
bahman wrote: ↑Tue Jun 29, 2021 7:54 pm
I define a person as mind and body. And you question and laugh at it.
So, WHENEVER ANY one questions and laughs at SOME thing, then that INSTANTLY MEANS that one does NOT KNOW the difference between 'definition' and 'proof', to you, correct?
Also, do you NOT like BEING QUESTIONED.
AND, WHERE did I EVER laugh when talking with you?
When you use LOL.
I have suggest BEFORE and I will suggest AGAIN, ask CLARIFYING QUESTIONS BEFORE 'you' JUMP to MAKING ASSUMPTIONS and/or BELIEVING things, then that way 'you' will NOT be SO WRONG, and as SO OFTEN, as 'you' HAVE BEEN .
Could LOL mean ANY thing else besides what 'you' THINK or BELIEVE it does here?
Or, does LOL HAVE TO MEAN what you THINK or BELIEVE it does?
bahman wrote: ↑Wed Jun 30, 2021 9:16 pm
Age wrote: ↑Tue Jun 29, 2021 4:52 am
bahman wrote: ↑Tue Jun 29, 2021 7:54 pm
That is another thing.
So, to you, "mind" has been around, "since the beginning", while "persons" have been around for not more than a few million years, but you ALSO CLAIM that 'person' IS "mind", correct?
No, person is mind and body.
Okay. So, the QUESTION STILL STANDS. That is:
So, to you, "mind" has been around, "since the beginning", while "persons" have been around for not more than a few million years, but you ALSO CLAIM that 'person' IS "mind" and body, correct?
bahman wrote: ↑Wed Jun 30, 2021 9:16 pm
Age wrote: ↑Tue Jun 29, 2021 4:52 am
bahman wrote: ↑Tue Jun 29, 2021 7:54 pm
It depends.
On 'what', EXACTLY,
Thinking?
Depends on how relevant is a quesion.
Well OBVIOUSLY ALL CLARIFYING QUESTIONS are EXTREMELY RELEVANT to the ONE who is ASKING the QUESTION. Otherwise, OBVIOUSLY, they would NOT ask THE QUESTION.
Do 'you' just IMAGINE, and then DECIDE, on just how RELEVANT a QUESTION is, for YOUR OWN BENEFIT, but which it was "another one" who has ACTUALLY asked and posed THAT QUESTION, to 'you'?
The relevance or not of a question, posed to you, is NOT depended upon 'you' but depends on the the one posing the question.
You are OBVIOUSLY COMPLETELY and UTTERLY FREE to answer or NOT answer, and answer and NOT answer in ANY WAY you see fit. However, NOT ANSWERING CLARIFYING QUESTIONS posed to 'you' is a SURE SIGN that one is NOT CAPABLE of being ABLE to answer that question, or just NOT WILLING to. And, either way, I suggest that if one can NOT back up and support THEIR CLAIMS BEFORE they MAKE A CLAIM, then it is BEST for them to NOT MAKE THE CLAIM, AT ALL.