I don't think so. The existence of physical constants like hbar, G and c, means that space is a substance rather than a pure vacuum.Scott Mayers wrote: ↑Tue Feb 09, 2021 4:59 pmPlank length is NOT a literal quantizable 'minimum'. It is defined in a way that others can determine a unit without a particular 'standard', like the original 'meter' being defined by a particular bar's length, for instance. When using literal standards of length, it is hard to use macro-objects (relative to quantum sizes) given they can be affected by temperature differences, material used, etc. It may also be the present smallest agreed to unit (conventional minimum), but it doesn't mean that there is some actual smallest interval greater than zero other than AT an interval of zero size, which would just be a point. But there are still paradoxes about spacial measures; just not related to the Plank length.bahman wrote: ↑Sun Jan 24, 2021 1:33 am This is believed to be the shortest distance between two points in space so-called Plank length. What is between two points? It cannot be nothing since otherwise two points obviously coincide. Therefore, there is something between the two points. This means that space is a substance. Following the same logic, it follows that time also is a substance.
I understand that this measure is a 'limit' of practical means of measuring. For instance, our fingers are of such a size that there is a limit to what we can use fingers. Plank is a limit based on the smallest means of measuring a specific unit size. The same goes with 0K, a measure that can only be inferred (as a singularity) but not something you can measure because at that temperature, no movement exists. So you cannot 'measure' it without CAUSING such points in space being measured to have some minimum limit.
Plank length and what is between
Re: Plank length and what is between
- Terrapin Station
- Posts: 4548
- Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 7:18 pm
- Location: NYC Man
Re: Plank length and what is between
Right. So that's what you're actually observing.attofishpi wrote: ↑Tue Feb 09, 2021 7:27 pmTerrapin Station wrote: ↑Tue Feb 09, 2021 6:34 pmIn other words, what are you receiving sensory data from? (What are you looking at?)attofishpi wrote: ↑Tue Feb 09, 2021 4:39 pm Not sure why you are insisting that it remains a theoretical conclusion. A conclusion in my book IS something observed.
The same tool you are looking at right now, technology.
- attofishpi
- Posts: 10010
- Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
- Location: Orion Spur
- Contact:
Re: Plank length and what is between
So to you it's just a theory that you are staring at words on a screen?Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Tue Feb 09, 2021 8:48 pmRight. So that's what you're actually observing.attofishpi wrote: ↑Tue Feb 09, 2021 7:27 pmTerrapin Station wrote: ↑Tue Feb 09, 2021 6:34 pm
In other words, what are you receiving sensory data from? (What are you looking at?)
The same tool you are looking at right now, technology.
charlie bravo foxtrot
- Terrapin Station
- Posts: 4548
- Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 7:18 pm
- Location: NYC Man
Re: Plank length and what is between
Because you don't think that you're literally seeing marks on a screen?attofishpi wrote: ↑Wed Feb 10, 2021 7:17 amSo to you it's just a theory that you are staring at words on a screen?
charlie bravo foxtrot
Re: Plank length and what is between
A vacuum sucking in a substance bends that substance. That substance bending, in contrast to the vaccuum, observes the vaccuum bending in relation to that substance. In simpler terms, a vaccuum bends because it is in contrast to the phenomenon bending. Contrast allows for a vaccuum to change as the contrast is change.
-
- Posts: 2446
- Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2015 1:53 am
Re: Plank length and what is between
This is a question related to measurement limits, not about what an actual smallest measure can be. It relates to the same issue between continuous versus discrete math and, where physics is concerned, the continuity that Einstein's Relativity theories prioritize versus Quantum Mechanics' choice to prioritize quantized (discrete) concepts. The planck length is a point where the QM side interprets physics breaks down. I think it is just due to the limitations of measure. Proposals of various 'theories' (conjectures may be more accurate) depend on the limits. [I hapen to be watching a doc on it now on BBC Earth called, Horizon of "How Small is the Universe". Maybe I can add more on this later after watching.]bahman wrote: ↑Tue Feb 09, 2021 8:38 pmI don't think so. The existence of physical constants like hbar, G and c, means that space is a substance rather than a pure vacuum.Scott Mayers wrote: ↑Tue Feb 09, 2021 4:59 pmPlank length is NOT a literal quantizable 'minimum'. It is defined in a way that others can determine a unit without a particular 'standard', like the original 'meter' being defined by a particular bar's length, for instance. When using literal standards of length, it is hard to use macro-objects (relative to quantum sizes) given they can be affected by temperature differences, material used, etc. It may also be the present smallest agreed to unit (conventional minimum), but it doesn't mean that there is some actual smallest interval greater than zero other than AT an interval of zero size, which would just be a point. But there are still paradoxes about spacial measures; just not related to the Plank length.bahman wrote: ↑Sun Jan 24, 2021 1:33 am This is believed to be the shortest distance between two points in space so-called Plank length. What is between two points? It cannot be nothing since otherwise two points obviously coincide. Therefore, there is something between the two points. This means that space is a substance. Following the same logic, it follows that time also is a substance.
I understand that this measure is a 'limit' of practical means of measuring. For instance, our fingers are of such a size that there is a limit to what we can use fingers. Plank is a limit based on the smallest means of measuring a specific unit size. The same goes with 0K, a measure that can only be inferred (as a singularity) but not something you can measure because at that temperature, no movement exists. So you cannot 'measure' it without CAUSING such points in space being measured to have some minimum limit.
Re: Plank length and what is between
It is not as much about the accuracy nor about the means of measurement, but about the time required for measurement. We would need more/slower time for more accurate measurements. Matter changes / grows "under hands" faster than we would need for measure it more accurately, simply put ...
Re: Plank length and what is between
Except when it doesn't change at all as we measure it faster and you hit time–energy indeterminacy.Cerveny wrote: ↑Tue Feb 16, 2021 9:27 am It is not as much about the accuracy nor about the means of measurement, but about the time required for measurement. We would need more/slower time for more accurate measurements. Matter changes / grows "under hands" faster than we would need for measure it more accurately, simply put ...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_Zeno_effect
Re: Plank length and what is between
Of course it has to do with "uncertainty relations". Please consider too, that "amorphous yet" matter condenses / "snows" from the "future" and creates new sediments / Planck’s (crystal) layers of the past ... Not only matter but also the order condenses from the "future". That is why to understand the past as "crystal". Things / layers must stick together to Universe can exist and gives a sense. By the way, life / mercy is coming from the future too...
see eg https://www.yourgemologist.com/FlameFus ... neuil.html
see eg https://www.yourgemologist.com/FlameFus ... neuil.html
Re: Plank length and what is between
The adhesive bond between the elements of growing block of the past is mediated by general causality...Cerveny wrote: ↑Tue Feb 16, 2021 2:12 pm Of course it has to do with "uncertainty relations". Please consider too, that "amorphous yet" matter condenses / "snows" from the "future" and creates new sediments / Planck’s (crystal) layers of the past ... Not only matter but also the order condenses from the "future". That is why to understand the past as "crystal". Things / layers must stick together to Universe can exist and gives a sense. By the way, life / mercy is coming from the future too...
see eg https://www.yourgemologist.com/FlameFus ... neuil.html
Re: Plank length and what is between
As for the "block universe," perhaps better, the "block of the past," we can think of it as a ball of water in space far from gravity.
https://youtu.be/H_qPWZbxFl8
Such a ball constantly condenses from the surroundings (from the future), grows, its surface grows. Now we need add one dimension. Then rhe 3-D surface is our current (borderless but limited) universe (time right now) and all our hyper ball is the 4-D “block” of history of the universe. We also need to replace water with a “dirty" crystal. The elementary particles are defects (dirtyness) in the (crystal) structure of Univese, which are permanently replicating, rise into the new time layers (Planck’s). In the beginning, there was no “big bang”, but only a tiny crystal grain, a cold germ of causality.
https://youtu.be/H_qPWZbxFl8
Such a ball constantly condenses from the surroundings (from the future), grows, its surface grows. Now we need add one dimension. Then rhe 3-D surface is our current (borderless but limited) universe (time right now) and all our hyper ball is the 4-D “block” of history of the universe. We also need to replace water with a “dirty" crystal. The elementary particles are defects (dirtyness) in the (crystal) structure of Univese, which are permanently replicating, rise into the new time layers (Planck’s). In the beginning, there was no “big bang”, but only a tiny crystal grain, a cold germ of causality.
Last edited by Cerveny on Sat Jun 19, 2021 3:05 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Plank length and what is between
This model aims, among other things, to explain that the "arrow of time" (normal, perpendicular to history) generally "points" (in frame of 4-D universe) in different, even opposite direction...Cerveny wrote: ↑Mon Mar 08, 2021 10:41 am As for the "block universe," perhaps better, the "block of the past," we can think of it as a ball of water in space far from gravity.
https://youtu.be/H_qPWZbxFl8
Such a ball constantly condenses from the surroundings (from the future), grows, its surface grows. Now we need add one dimension. Then rhe 3-D surface is our current (borderless but limited) universe (time right now) and all our hyper ball is the 4-D “block” of history of the universe. We also need to replace water with a “dirty" crystal. The elementary particles are defects (dirtyness) in the (crystal) structure of Univese, which are permanently replicating, rise into the new time layers (Planck’s), into the “Future”. At the beginning, there was no “big bang”, but only a tin crystal grain, a cold germ of causality.
Re: Plank length and what is between
at the beginning was a word:) that means a limited, ordered set of defined elements... Certain DNA of the Universe...
Re: Plank length and what is between
This is a very old quesiton, far predating modern physics. Hindu monks debated it 3,000 years ago from watching motes of dust in sunbeams. What is the smallest particle that can exist? They asked. The answer was, a particle has an inside and an outside. Imagine an infinitely large circle, and position the smallest possible particles next to each other. Adding all the particles on the circle together around the long distance between two neighboring particles would show them infinitely far about, Therefore the short distance between the center of two neighboring particles would be zero. Therefore particles must be compartments of space that can overlap, each of which may be 'filled' or not. So what does that mean. Not very much in physics, lol, but epistemologically, it says the problem is not about what a model of 'Planck length' tells us about actual reality, but rather that we reach limits on what our comprehension of the apparent material world can tell us which remains meaningful to physics.Scott Mayers wrote: ↑Tue Feb 16, 2021 4:49 amThis is a question related to measurement limits, not about what an actual smallest measure can be. It relates to the same issue between continuous versus discrete math and, where physics is concerned, the continuity that Einstein's Relativity theories prioritize versus Quantum Mechanics' choice to prioritize quantized (discrete) concepts. The planck length is a point where the QM side interprets physics breaks down. I think it is just due to the limitations of measure. Proposals of various 'theories' (conjectures may be more accurate) depend on the limits. [I hapen to be watching a doc on it now on BBC Earth called, Horizon of "How Small is the Universe". Maybe I can add more on this later after watching.]bahman wrote: ↑Tue Feb 09, 2021 8:38 pmI don't think so. The existence of physical constants like hbar, G and c, means that space is a substance rather than a pure vacuum.Scott Mayers wrote: ↑Tue Feb 09, 2021 4:59 pm
Plank length is NOT a literal quantizable 'minimum'. It is defined in a way that others can determine a unit without a particular 'standard', like the original 'meter' being defined by a particular bar's length, for instance. When using literal standards of length, it is hard to use macro-objects (relative to quantum sizes) given they can be affected by temperature differences, material used, etc. It may also be the present smallest agreed to unit (conventional minimum), but it doesn't mean that there is some actual smallest interval greater than zero other than AT an interval of zero size, which would just be a point. But there are still paradoxes about spacial measures; just not related to the Plank length.
I understand that this measure is a 'limit' of practical means of measuring. For instance, our fingers are of such a size that there is a limit to what we can use fingers. Plank is a limit based on the smallest means of measuring a specific unit size. The same goes with 0K, a measure that can only be inferred (as a singularity) but not something you can measure because at that temperature, no movement exists. So you cannot 'measure' it without CAUSING such points in space being measured to have some minimum limit.
Last edited by ernestm on Thu Apr 08, 2021 5:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Plank length and what is between
I'm not a fan of the Higgs boson, but as a stem cell of Universe it might be useful .. in this case it would be more of a "molecule" of the aether (vacuum)