Cerveny wrote: ↑Mon Jun 08, 2020 7:42 pm
High physics died - because of Einstein
He did not recognize that space (everything) was grainy
He did not recognize the fatal difference between the future and history
He did not consider the difference in gravitational behavior between matter and antimatter
BTW: The most important question is whether the universe (especially life) has meaning, purpose ...
Einstein was merely a reluctant figurehead made by the people behind the contemporary Einsteinian Theory of Relativity (TOR) who have had adulterated the original version of Einstein's TOR.
The Einstein's TOR description on the effect of gravity that curves spacetime discreetly correlates as a spacetime vortex model, and it is a subjective study of nature with precise quantitative predictions for how a celestial object falls in the curved spacetime in the gravitational singularity of another celestial object.
This is a paradigm shift of Newton's law of universal gravitation, and it fundamentally upends the conventional concept of the classical gravity with his aetheric (spacetime) vortex model. The mainstream Einsteinian TOR merely looked at the improved precision with the relativistic effect of the General Theory of Relativity for applying mathematically to refine the quantitative predictions of Newtonian gravity, but this is not the paradigm shift Einstein was referring to on the gravitational singularity of his spacetime vortex model.
See an article on "
NASA Announces Results of Epic Space-Time Experiment" that reports on NASA had confirmed that fundamentally there is a spacetime vortex around the Earth.
In this sense, there exists a gravitational singularity of the space time vortex wherein the Earth and the Moon is gyrating around to revolve around the gravitational singularity of the Solar System. This spacetime vortex model is a paradigm shift from the Newtonian Sun centric Solar System model.
The recently proven Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC) is accomplished scientific research in quantum physics with electromagnetically induced vortices that are quantized and known to be in precession as a result of their interactions with photons in an enclosure. As per see with the Cartesian granular concept in his vortex theory, Einstein probably knew everything is grainy as a result of their underlying vortical motion that manifests their mass effect in the aetheric field.
The spacetime postulated by Einstein is the relativistic aether he had tried to clarify repeatedly to the deaf ears of the Einsteinian authority.
Cerveny wrote: ↑Mon Jun 08, 2020 7:42 pm
BTW: The most important question is whether the universe (especially life) has meaning, purpose ...
This is a mind-bending philosophical question, and so it deserves its philosophical treatment, please allow me to try:
The universe has no purpose as is, but everything manifested in its wakes is all purposeful; this perhaps is the purpose of the purposeless nature of the universe as per se.
As far as you are concerned, you are the very purpose of the universe.
Cerveny wrote: ↑Fri Aug 14, 2020 1:52 pm
The calculation of Mercury's motion can be derived without relativity, assuming a limited speed of gravitational propagation (gravitational flow) . We should realize that Mercury approaching the Sun receives a different intensity of gravitational exposition than Mercury receding. The gravitational field is not static, but is permanently generated by the general motion of matter toward the future (the time goes ahead)... mc^2 can be understood as the kinetic energy of this motion...
As for “exposition” it is the similar difference as running against rain and running along the rain...
With the original Einstein's aetheric vortex model, the gravitational propagation indeed could be understood as the kinetic energy of the aetheric vortical motion on the classical platform. And it doesn't need to invoke the mythical modern physics of the Einsteinian TOR.
The energy that manifests the vortically resonated mass effect of matter, is rendered by the kinetic energy of matter in its intrinsic two axis-spin at the speed of light in each of the two axes, which is transferred from the aether vortical motion of the universe in its two-axis spin; E = ½mv² + ½mv² = mc², where m is mass, v is velocity, c is speed of light, and v equals to c.
IMO, this quantifiable paradoxical phenomenon of matters (m = E/c²) with physical properties manifested in the nonmaterial aetheric medium, infers any object that exists in the objective reality, is merely a manifestation of aether vortical motion in its primary two-axis spin at the speed of light in its spacetime vortex, which renders the mass effect of the object be it the macrocosms or the microcosms.
Just my 2c.