High physics died

How does science work? And what's all this about quantum mechanics?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Post Reply
User avatar
Cerveny
Posts: 603
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 9:35 pm
Location: Czech Republic
Contact:

High physics died

Post by Cerveny »

High physics died - because of Einstein
He did not recognize that space (everything) was grainy
He did not recognize the fatal difference between the future and history
He did not consider the difference in gravitational behavior between matter and antimatter
:(

BTW: The most important question is whether the universe (especially life) has meaning, purpose ...
nothing
Posts: 595
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2019 9:32 pm

Re: High physics died

Post by nothing »

Physics is dead-on-arrival because the mathematics used to describe is dead-on-arrival.
Mathematicians still, to this day, do not know precisely how to measure a circle
without "approximating" it with straight lines such to believe pi is "transcendental".

Image

Pi is not transcendental.
It is a root of
f(x) = x⁴ + 16x² - 256
which has four roots
(two real, two imaginary):
±√9.88854381999...
±i√25.88854381999...

These four roots are the axes of the physical universe
through which all real/imaginary values transit.

π = 4/√Φ = √(8√5-8)
π² = 16/Φ = (8√5-8)
16 = Φπ²
e = MC²
1 = Φπ²/16

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wBYBRGHrudc

Do not expect Western science to ever be able to admit
they were/are wrong - they only care about funding
thus will invent entire fields of research that have
no existential basis in reality.
Impenitent
Posts: 3039
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 2:04 pm

Re: High physics died

Post by Impenitent »

did physics jump off the high roof and let gravity take over?

-Imp
User avatar
Cerveny
Posts: 603
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 9:35 pm
Location: Czech Republic
Contact:

Re: High physics died

Post by Cerveny »

How can we (Einstein) claim that matter / antimatter or antimatter / antimatter are (automatically) gravitationally attracted and build on it whole physics?
wtf
Posts: 969
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2015 11:36 pm

Re: High physics died

Post by wtf »

Cerveny wrote: Sat Jul 25, 2020 7:20 pm How can we (Einstein) claim that matter / antimatter or antimatter / antimatter are (automatically) gravitationally attracted and build on it whole physics?
It was Newton who had the profound insight that every mass in the universe attracts ever other mass. Einstein merely provided a more refined mathematical model that explained certain observations such as the precession of Mercury better than Newton's model did.

Neither theory is "true" in any absolute sense. They're only contingently true, till a better theory comes along.

But of course neither Newton or Einstein thought that gravity was the whole of physics. Maxwell developed his beautiful theory of electromagnetism; and it's now recognized that special relativity follows from Maxwell's theory.

http://www.hep.princeton.edu/~mcdonald/ ... ll_rel.pdf
User avatar
Cerveny
Posts: 603
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 9:35 pm
Location: Czech Republic
Contact:

Re: High physics died

Post by Cerveny »

wtf wrote: Thu Jul 30, 2020 4:18 am
Cerveny wrote: Sat Jul 25, 2020 7:20 pm How can we (Einstein) claim that matter / antimatter or antimatter / antimatter are (automatically) gravitationally attracted and build on it whole physics?
It was Newton who had the profound insight that every mass in the universe attracts ever other mass. Einstein merely provided a more refined mathematical model that explained certain observations such as the precession of Mercury better than Newton's model did.
...
The calculation of Mercury's motion can be derived without relativity, assuming a limited speed of gravitational propagation (gravitational flow) . We should realize that Mercury approaching the Sun receives a different intensity of gravitational exposition than Mercury receding. The gravitational field is not static, but is permanently generated by the general motion of matter toward the future (the time goes ahead)... mc^2 can be understood as the kinetic energy of this motion...
As for “exposition” it is the similar difference as running against rain and running along the rain...
User avatar
Cerveny
Posts: 603
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 9:35 pm
Location: Czech Republic
Contact:

Re: High physics died

Post by Cerveny »

Instead of mathematical pollution we need work with the logic. We need to finding out a model of Universe that explains e.g.
- why exists only discrete spectrum of elementary particles (what limits them)
- why elementary particles are born in pairs (what limits them)
- why nothing can move faster then, say, the light (what limits them)
- what keeps space together...
User avatar
Cerveny
Posts: 603
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 9:35 pm
Location: Czech Republic
Contact:

Re: High physics died

Post by Cerveny »

What can keep all things, even the field, so that it doesn't go faster? Only the time manages it. Anything cannot exceed the Time. Time dynamically creates the History by a limited speed. Our specific future does not exist set. It will be assembled dynamically. Nothing as Einstein’s future cone exists:(
User avatar
Paradigmer
Posts: 68
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2020 4:53 pm

Re: High physics died

Post by Paradigmer »

Cerveny wrote: Mon Jun 08, 2020 7:42 pm High physics died - because of Einstein
He did not recognize that space (everything) was grainy
He did not recognize the fatal difference between the future and history
He did not consider the difference in gravitational behavior between matter and antimatter
:(

BTW: The most important question is whether the universe (especially life) has meaning, purpose ...
Einstein was merely a reluctant figurehead made by the people behind the contemporary Einsteinian Theory of Relativity (TOR) who have had adulterated the original version of Einstein's TOR.

The Einstein's TOR description on the effect of gravity that curves spacetime discreetly correlates as a spacetime vortex model, and it is a subjective study of nature with precise quantitative predictions for how a celestial object falls in the curved spacetime in the gravitational singularity of another celestial object.

This is a paradigm shift of Newton's law of universal gravitation, and it fundamentally upends the conventional concept of the classical gravity with his aetheric (spacetime) vortex model. The mainstream Einsteinian TOR merely looked at the improved precision with the relativistic effect of the General Theory of Relativity for applying mathematically to refine the quantitative predictions of Newtonian gravity, but this is not the paradigm shift Einstein was referring to on the gravitational singularity of his spacetime vortex model.

See an article on "NASA Announces Results of Epic Space-Time Experiment" that reports on NASA had confirmed that fundamentally there is a spacetime vortex around the Earth.

In this sense, there exists a gravitational singularity of the space time vortex wherein the Earth and the Moon is gyrating around to revolve around the gravitational singularity of the Solar System. This spacetime vortex model is a paradigm shift from the Newtonian Sun centric Solar System model.

The recently proven Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC) is accomplished scientific research in quantum physics with electromagnetically induced vortices that are quantized and known to be in precession as a result of their interactions with photons in an enclosure. As per see with the Cartesian granular concept in his vortex theory, Einstein probably knew everything is grainy as a result of their underlying vortical motion that manifests their mass effect in the aetheric field.

The spacetime postulated by Einstein is the relativistic aether he had tried to clarify repeatedly to the deaf ears of the Einsteinian authority.
Cerveny wrote: Mon Jun 08, 2020 7:42 pm BTW: The most important question is whether the universe (especially life) has meaning, purpose ...
This is a mind-bending philosophical question, and so it deserves its philosophical treatment, please allow me to try:

The universe has no purpose as is, but everything manifested in its wakes is all purposeful; this perhaps is the purpose of the purposeless nature of the universe as per se. :wink:

As far as you are concerned, you are the very purpose of the universe.
Cerveny wrote: Fri Aug 14, 2020 1:52 pm The calculation of Mercury's motion can be derived without relativity, assuming a limited speed of gravitational propagation (gravitational flow) . We should realize that Mercury approaching the Sun receives a different intensity of gravitational exposition than Mercury receding. The gravitational field is not static, but is permanently generated by the general motion of matter toward the future (the time goes ahead)... mc^2 can be understood as the kinetic energy of this motion...
As for “exposition” it is the similar difference as running against rain and running along the rain...
With the original Einstein's aetheric vortex model, the gravitational propagation indeed could be understood as the kinetic energy of the aetheric vortical motion on the classical platform. And it doesn't need to invoke the mythical modern physics of the Einsteinian TOR.

The energy that manifests the vortically resonated mass effect of matter, is rendered by the kinetic energy of matter in its intrinsic two axis-spin at the speed of light in each of the two axes, which is transferred from the aether vortical motion of the universe in its two-axis spin; E = ½mv² + ½mv² = mc², where m is mass, v is velocity, c is speed of light, and v equals to c.

IMO, this quantifiable paradoxical phenomenon of matters (m = E/c²) with physical properties manifested in the nonmaterial aetheric medium, infers any object that exists in the objective reality, is merely a manifestation of aether vortical motion in its primary two-axis spin at the speed of light in its spacetime vortex, which renders the mass effect of the object be it the macrocosms or the microcosms.

Just my 2c.
Last edited by Paradigmer on Sun Aug 30, 2020 10:19 am, edited 3 times in total.
User avatar
Paradigmer
Posts: 68
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2020 4:53 pm

Re: High physics died

Post by Paradigmer »

Repeated post.
Last edited by Paradigmer on Sun Aug 30, 2020 9:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
Age
Posts: 5145
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: High physics died

Post by Age »

Cerveny wrote: Mon Jun 08, 2020 7:42 pm High physics died - because of Einstein
He did not recognize that space (everything) was grainy
He did not recognize the fatal difference between the future and history
He did not consider the difference in gravitational behavior between matter and antimatter
:(

BTW: The most important question is whether the universe (especially life) has meaning, purpose ...
If that is, supposedly, the most important question, then the most important answer would be, and is, 'Yes'.
Post Reply