bahman wrote: ↑Sat Mar 12, 2022 10:35 pm
popeye1945 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 12, 2022 4:10 am
Impenitent wrote: ↑Sat Mar 21, 2020 9:44 pm
He never ate a donut
-Imp
GOOD ONE!!!!!!
Couldn't you do better? For example, refute my argument?
But, "your argument" was ALREADY 'self-refuted'.
This is because in "your argument" you are ASSUMING 'things', and 'your conclusion" is based upon those ASSUMPTIONS.
Now, OBVIOUSLY, just because 'you' ASSUME some 'things', this does NOT MEAN that those ASSUMED 'things' are true, right, NOR correct.
If 'we' are going to ASSUME 'things' in 'an argument', then the conclusion of 'that argument' is NOT necessarily going to be true, right, NOR correct.
So, what you will HAVE TO DO from now on, that is; if you want to PROVIDE an ACTUAL sound AND valid, thus IRREFUTABLE 'argument', is start by PROVIDING ACTUAL PROOFS for what you say in "your arguments" or PROVIDE EXAMPLES of 'things' that ACTUALLY DO EXIST.
THEN, we can LOOK AT and DISCUSS "your arguments" AGAIN.
Until then you have YET to PROVIDE an ACTUAL sound AND valid 'argument'. As I have INFORMED you ALREADY those types of 'arguments' are the ONLY ones LOOKING AT and REPEATING, as they are the ONLY ones that are IRREFUTABLE. EVERY other type of 'argument' is REFUTABLE and so REALLY NOT even worth MENTIONING, let alone TALKING ABOUT and DISCUSSING, REPEATEDLY.