Page 22 of 22

Re: There is no emergence

Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2019 6:52 pm
by Skepdick
PTH wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2019 6:25 pm Its more that you are demonstrating it.
No. You are SAYING that I am demonstrating "it". You are narrating your experience of my behaviour in your language.

But am I actually demonstrating "it"? What would falsify your hypothesis?
PTH wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2019 6:25 pm You also seem to be demonstrating empathy.
You are SAYING that I am demonstrating 'empathy'. You are narrating your experience of my behaviour in your language.

But am I actually demonstrating 'empathy'? What would falsify your hypothesis?

Ascribing ontological properties to me is a hypothesis of yours.
It could be true, or it could be a reification error.

You are working with incomplete information, yet you continually refuse to state a falsification criterion.

Re: There is no emergence

Posted: Tue Oct 15, 2019 5:10 pm
by PTH
Skepdick wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2019 6:52 pmBut am I actually demonstrating 'empathy'? What would falsify your hypothesis?
If you said something that lacked the feature of empathy?