No. You are SAYING that I am demonstrating "it". You are narrating your experience of my behaviour in your language.
But am I actually demonstrating "it"? What would falsify your hypothesis?
You are SAYING that I am demonstrating 'empathy'. You are narrating your experience of my behaviour in your language.
But am I actually demonstrating 'empathy'? What would falsify your hypothesis?
Ascribing ontological properties to me is a hypothesis of yours.
It could be true, or it could be a reification error.
You are working with incomplete information, yet you continually refuse to state a falsification criterion.