Zero Vacuum's Quantum Particle
Zero Vacuum's Quantum Particle
Zero Vacuum's Quantum Particle
===
1 - According to the Theory of Ideal gas the
quantum particle has Boltzmann's molar-mass (k)
2 - According to the Charle’s law this molar-mass (k)
particle has a flat geometrical form.
3 - According to the Quantum Theory the quantum
particle has Dirac's negative energy ( -E=Mc^2)
4 - According to Einstein's SRT the quantum
particle can fly with constant speed ( c=1 )
5 - According to the Uhlenbeck and Goudsmit
quantum particle has an angular momentum
=======
===
1 - According to the Theory of Ideal gas the
quantum particle has Boltzmann's molar-mass (k)
2 - According to the Charle’s law this molar-mass (k)
particle has a flat geometrical form.
3 - According to the Quantum Theory the quantum
particle has Dirac's negative energy ( -E=Mc^2)
4 - According to Einstein's SRT the quantum
particle can fly with constant speed ( c=1 )
5 - According to the Uhlenbeck and Goudsmit
quantum particle has an angular momentum
=======
Re: Zero Vacuum's Quantum Particle
“ The problem of the exact description of vacuum, in my opinion,
is the basic problem now before physics. Really, if you can’t correctly
describe the vacuum, how it is possible to expect a correct description
of something more complex? “
/ Paul Dirac /
#
“The most fundamental question facing 21st century physics will be:
What is the vacuum? As quantum mechanics teaches us, with
its zero point energy this vacuum is not empty and the word
vacuum is a gross misnomer!”
/ Prof. Friedwardt Winterberg /
#
Book: The Fermi Solution,
''. . . : something seems wrong with our idea of the vacuum.
It is we who abhor a vacuum, who recoil from the stillness
of the void as from an open grave.''
/ by Hans Christian von Baeyer, page 37-38. /
========
is the basic problem now before physics. Really, if you can’t correctly
describe the vacuum, how it is possible to expect a correct description
of something more complex? “
/ Paul Dirac /
#
“The most fundamental question facing 21st century physics will be:
What is the vacuum? As quantum mechanics teaches us, with
its zero point energy this vacuum is not empty and the word
vacuum is a gross misnomer!”
/ Prof. Friedwardt Winterberg /
#
Book: The Fermi Solution,
''. . . : something seems wrong with our idea of the vacuum.
It is we who abhor a vacuum, who recoil from the stillness
of the void as from an open grave.''
/ by Hans Christian von Baeyer, page 37-38. /
========
Re: Zero Vacuum's Quantum Particle
Don't mind, substantial is, that we understand the black holes.socrat44 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 3:51 pm “ The problem of the exact description of vacuum, in my opinion,
is the basic problem now before physics. Really, if you can’t correctly
describe the vacuum, how it is possible to expect a correct description
of something more complex? “
/ Paul Dirac /
#
...
========
-
- Posts: 4365
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 2:04 pm
Re: Zero Vacuum's Quantum Particle
zero vacuum doesn't suck...
-Imp
-Imp
Re: Zero Vacuum's Quantum Particle
1 - Dirac's theory has reference frame of vacuumsocrat44 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:19 am Zero Vacuum's Quantum Particle
===
1 - According to the Theory of Ideal gas the
quantum particle has Boltzmann's molar-mass (k)
2 - According to the Charle’s law this molar-mass (k)
particle has a flat geometrical form.
3 - According to the Quantum Theory the quantum
particle has Dirac's negative energy ( -E=Mc^2)
4 - According to Einstein's SRT the quantum
particle can fly with constant speed ( c=1 )
5 - According to the Uhlenbeck and Goudsmit
quantum particle has an angular momentum
=======
and therefore (-E=Mc^2)
2 - Einstein's SRT postulate has reference frame
of vacuum and therefore speed is ( c=1)
3 - Theory of Ideal gas has reference frame of vacuum
but theoretical quantum physics ignores this framework.
========
Re: Zero Vacuum's Quantum Particle
The theory of ideal gas is not an ''abstract theory'' orsocrat44 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 3:26 pm1 - Dirac's theory has reference frame of vacuumsocrat44 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:19 am Zero Vacuum's Quantum Particle
===
1 - According to the Theory of Ideal gas the
quantum particle has Boltzmann's molar-mass (k)
2 - According to the Charle’s law this molar-mass (k)
particle has a flat geometrical form.
3 - According to the Quantum Theory the quantum
particle has Dirac's negative energy ( -E=Mc^2)
4 - According to Einstein's SRT the quantum
particle can fly with constant speed ( c=1 )
5 - According to the Uhlenbeck and Goudsmit
quantum particle has an angular momentum
=======
and therefore (-E=Mc^2)
2 - Einstein's SRT postulate has reference frame
of vacuum and therefore speed is ( c=1)
3 - Theory of Ideal gas has reference frame of vacuum
but theoretical quantum physics ignores this framework.
========
only ''useful as a simple approximation''
It is useful as Real theory about situation in the Vacuum.
The quantum particles have their source in the Vacuum.
The real particles appear from Vacuum.
(Casimir effect, Lamb shift, vacuum's fluctuation . . ..etc)
#
To understand itself, Quantum physics must be united
with Thermodynamics of Ideal gas
(this is a missed idea in modern physics)
========
Re: Zero Vacuum's Quantum Particle
?????? above my head - though have some education of............socrat44 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:19 am Zero Vacuum's Quantum Particle
===
1 - According to the Theory of Ideal gas the
quantum particle has Boltzmann's molar-mass (k)
2 - According to the Charle’s law this molar-mass (k)
particle has a flat geometrical form.
3 - According to the Quantum Theory the quantum
particle has Dirac's negative energy ( -E=Mc^2)
4 - According to Einstein's SRT the quantum
particle can fly with constant speed ( c=1 )
5 - According to the Uhlenbeck and Goudsmit
quantum particle has an angular momentum
=======
SPIN 1.jpg
your point?
Re: Zero Vacuum's Quantum Particle
maybe you know something other than word salad?socrat44 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 14, 2019 11:13 amThe theory of ideal gas is not an ''abstract theory'' orsocrat44 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 3:26 pm1 - Dirac's theory has reference frame of vacuumsocrat44 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:19 am Zero Vacuum's Quantum Particle
===
1 - According to the Theory of Ideal gas the
quantum particle has Boltzmann's molar-mass (k)
2 - According to the Charle’s law this molar-mass (k)
particle has a flat geometrical form.
3 - According to the Quantum Theory the quantum
particle has Dirac's negative energy ( -E=Mc^2)
4 - According to Einstein's SRT the quantum
particle can fly with constant speed ( c=1 )
5 - According to the Uhlenbeck and Goudsmit
quantum particle has an angular momentum
=======
and therefore (-E=Mc^2)
2 - Einstein's SRT postulate has reference frame
of vacuum and therefore speed is ( c=1)
3 - Theory of Ideal gas has reference frame of vacuum
but theoretical quantum physics ignores this framework.
========
only ''useful as a simple approximation''
It is useful as Real theory about situation in the Vacuum.
The quantum particles have their source in the Vacuum.
The real particles appear from Vacuum.
(Casimir effect, Lamb shift, vacuum's fluctuation . . ..etc)
#
To understand itself, Quantum physics must be united
with Thermodynamics of Ideal gas
(this is a missed idea in modern physics)
========
the missing puzzle.jpg
welcome more from you Sir.
no, no unified theory yet 60 yrs and counting.
Re: Zero Vacuum's Quantum Particle
I can see the empty physical space as a 4D crystal (growing along time axe) of stem (aether) particles that can decay to eg positron/electron pairs. The corresponding lattice constant is just Planck's time.... Is it possible then to change history by extreme pressure?
Last edited by Cerveny on Sat Apr 18, 2020 11:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Zero Vacuum's Quantum Particle
Maybe it is possible to forge empty space from the mass (forging pushes out structural defects - eg dislocations). Perhaps it is related with black holes evaporation or galactic jets?... (Let me to remind, please, that I see elementary particles as structural defects in physical empty space...)Cerveny wrote: ↑Sun Mar 08, 2020 8:41 pm I can see the empty physical space as a 4D crystal (growing along time axe) of stem (aether) particles that can decay to eg positron/electron pairs... It means that Now is the 3D surface of the past...
Is it possible then to change history by extreme pressure?
Re: Zero Vacuum's Quantum Particle
Recrystallization of physical space can take place inside "black holes" ... ;)Cerveny wrote: ↑Wed Apr 15, 2020 11:37 pmMaybe it is possible to forge empty space from the mass (forging pushes out structural defects - eg dislocations). Perhaps it is related with black holes evaporation or galactic jets?... (Let me to remind, please, that I see elementary particles as structural defects in physical empty space...)Cerveny wrote: ↑Sun Mar 08, 2020 8:41 pm I can see the empty physical space as a 4D crystal (growing along time axe) of stem (aether) particles that can decay to eg positron/electron pairs... It means that Now is the 3D surface of the past...
Is it possible then to change history by extreme pressure?
Re: Zero Vacuum's Quantum Particle
Scientific definition.gaffo wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2019 1:43 ammaybe you know something other than word salad?socrat44 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 14, 2019 11:13 amThe theory of ideal gas is not an ''abstract theory'' orsocrat44 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 3:26 pm
1 - Dirac's theory has reference frame of vacuum
and therefore (-E=Mc^2)
2 - Einstein's SRT postulate has reference frame
of vacuum and therefore speed is ( c=1)
3 - Theory of Ideal gas has reference frame of vacuum
but theoretical quantum physics ignores this framework.
========
only ''useful as a simple approximation''
It is useful as Real theory about situation in the Vacuum.
The quantum particles have their source in the Vacuum.
The real particles appear from Vacuum.
(Casimir effect, Lamb shift, vacuum's fluctuation . . ..etc)
#
To understand itself, Quantum physics must be united
with Thermodynamics of Ideal gas
(this is a missed idea in modern physics)
========
the missing puzzle.jpg
welcome more from you Sir.
no, no unified theory yet 60 yrs and counting.
The definition in classical physics is different from the definition in quantum physics.
Classical physics --- Quantum physics
1) particle ----- similar particle
2) wave ----- similar wave
3) momentum ----- similar rotation
4) shape ----- point
5) time ---- time space
6) space ---- space-time
7) determinism --- HUP
----------------------------------------
This difference makes it difficult to understand physical reality.
- Terrapin Station
- Posts: 4548
- Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 7:18 pm
- Location: NYC Man
Re: Zero Vacuum's Quantum Particle
I agree with "your point?"
I don't get what the gist of this thread is. You don't seem to either be making a statement about anything or asking a question about anything. It seems like you're just rattling off various terse ideas.
I don't get what the gist of this thread is. You don't seem to either be making a statement about anything or asking a question about anything. It seems like you're just rattling off various terse ideas.
Re: Zero Vacuum's Quantum Particle
[/quote]
Scientific definition.
The definition in classical physics is different from the definition in quantum physics.
Classical physics --- Quantum physics
1) particle ----- similar particle
2) wave ----- similar wave
3) momentum ----- similar rotation
4) shape ----- point
5) time ---- time space
6) space ---- space-time
7) determinism --- HUP
----------------------------------------
This difference makes it difficult to understand physical reality.
[/quote]
By idea, a good scientific theory must have three ingredients: stuff, arena, a set of physics laws.
In quantum theory the three ingredients look strange:
the stuff is ‘’like-seems-particles’’ which have ''like-seems-spin'' and
‘’like-seems-waves’’ which ''seems-collapse '' . . .
the arena is very famous but really unknown arena of ''an absolute four-dimensional spacetime''
. . . and essences of quantum laws have probability basis.
Under these circumstances we are chess players who attempt to play an imaginary game
on the imaginary checkerboard of world. Therefore somebody wrote:
‘’Philosophy of quantum physics is certainly not the place where logic lives.’’
======
Scientific definition.
The definition in classical physics is different from the definition in quantum physics.
Classical physics --- Quantum physics
1) particle ----- similar particle
2) wave ----- similar wave
3) momentum ----- similar rotation
4) shape ----- point
5) time ---- time space
6) space ---- space-time
7) determinism --- HUP
----------------------------------------
This difference makes it difficult to understand physical reality.
[/quote]
By idea, a good scientific theory must have three ingredients: stuff, arena, a set of physics laws.
In quantum theory the three ingredients look strange:
the stuff is ‘’like-seems-particles’’ which have ''like-seems-spin'' and
‘’like-seems-waves’’ which ''seems-collapse '' . . .
the arena is very famous but really unknown arena of ''an absolute four-dimensional spacetime''
. . . and essences of quantum laws have probability basis.
Under these circumstances we are chess players who attempt to play an imaginary game
on the imaginary checkerboard of world. Therefore somebody wrote:
‘’Philosophy of quantum physics is certainly not the place where logic lives.’’
======
- Terrapin Station
- Posts: 4548
- Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 7:18 pm
- Location: NYC Man
Re: Zero Vacuum's Quantum Particle
So basically the idea of the thread is simply skepticism about the veracity of quantum physics interpretations?