Natural selection shown to be wrong

[anne]

Natural selection shown to be wrong
Darwins book is called
"On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection ...."

http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/wp ... ection.pdf

but this paper shows natural selection is not the origin of new species

Natural selection does not generate new genes/species
Natural selection adds no new genetic information
as it only deals with the passing on of genes/traits already
present and it will be pointed out genetics cannot account for
the generation of new species/genes as it is claimed the
generation of new genes [via mutation] is a random process
due to radiation, viruses, chemicals etc and genetic cannot
account for these process happening as they are out side the
scope of genetics physics, chaos theory etc may give some
explanation but genetics cant

[Logik]

The premise is flawed.

Yes. genetic variance is the product of chaos/entropy (call it whatever you wish).

Natural selection is the process by which genes are removed from the cohort.

Natural selection is not "selective" in that it targets any particular genes. It just randomly wipes out populations.

Those which survive, are by definition the ones we observe. Quite literally survivorship bias.

[gaffo]

The premise is flawed.

Yes. genetic variance is the product of chaos/entropy (call it whatever you wish).

Natural selection is the process by which genes are removed from the cohort.

Natural selection is not "selective" in that it targets any particular genes. It just randomly wipes out populations.

Those which survive, are by definition the ones we observe. Quite literally survivorship bias.

yes, NS/evoltution is all about mass death (and temp survival for a time) over eons.

99.9999999999999 of all living beings/flora that lived for a time in past - due to evolution - today are long dead - due to evolution also.

the remaining - all live today - will join the 99 percent club in time.

than as today and in the future.