You don't read so well. Not ALL artistic rendering of science is blasphemous. Only those which depict instances of nature which do not correspond to science or to observed reality AND claim that the picture is a true representation of reality.Scott Mayers wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2019 1:52 pmYes, the word was "note".-1- wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2019 8:32 am(I think you wanted to write "And note that most images...")Scott Mayers wrote: ↑Sun Mar 24, 2019 7:05 am And not that most images of space are just as often touched up artistically for color and sparkling effects for demonstrating their beauty.
The artistically enhanced images still ought not to be anti-scientific like the rays coming out from behind this unfortunately depicted black hole.
I'm guessing the first image I showed was demonstrating gravitational lensing that occurs, not rays.
But if you are saying it is anti-science, are you saying artistic rendering of Nature is blasphemous like drawing a picture of Mohammad?
I think it was pretty clear from the outset that this is what I had meant.