Non-sequitur.Logik wrote: ↑Mon Apr 29, 2019 4:05 pmNon-sequitur. You asked for evidence. I don't know what you are asking for.Age wrote: ↑Mon Apr 29, 2019 4:01 pm So, you KNOW how to communicate in the "RIGHT" way and say that it is done by defining ALL the words one uses. YET, you have made it clear that you use your OWN specific definitions for the words you use, and when asked for that specific definition, which you made clear you have on a particular word, you completely and utterly refused to. So, the RIGHT way is define the words you use but you will NOT. So, do you communicate the RIGHT way OR the WRONG way?
Are you at least able to define that for us here now?
Also and by the way as I wonder you DID NOT admit that you were NOT telling the truth before nor DID YOU RESPOND to what I actually wrote and questioned you about. Your continual complete inability to answer my clarifying questions leaves me in less doubt each time about your true intentions here. You ask me about what I would accept as sufficient evidence for the expansion of space. I TELL YOU, yet you completely ignore ALL of that, and then go on to ask me to define the word 'evidence'. Remember it was you who WANTED me to answer a question regarding the word 'evidence', but you then expect me to define the very words that you, yourself, use and bring up. All appears rather VERY contradictory to me.
Define 'evidence'.
If you do NOT know what I am asking for, then OBVIOUSLY do NOT answer. How OBVIOUSLY SIMPLE is that?
I also ONLY asked for EVIDENCE from those that SAY 'the Universe is expanding'. You would NEVER say any such thing because you have your own agenda here, and putting forward any VIEW, which could be questioned is NOT some thing that you like to do.
I found it better to NOT ask for some thing that you do NOT even want anyway.