bahman wrote: ↑Sat Feb 02, 2019 3:05 pm
Age wrote: ↑Sat Feb 02, 2019 5:51 am
bahman wrote: ↑Fri Feb 01, 2019 11:56 pm
I am asking a question.
I don't think so. Could you please elaborate that what I misconstrued?
It is a important question if you consider the next question too. Instruction is either subjective or objective.
I think I understood you good.
Instruction is either an idea/subjective or objective. Which one do you pick?
You asked: How does the blind matter behave accordingly?.
I answered: IF 'instructions' are built within matter, then that is HOW blind matter behaves accordingly.
Some instructions are ideas/subjective (like living in a truly peaceful word), some instructions are objective (like within dna), which 'instructions' are you referring to here?
There is a problem in each case. Matter should be aware of subjective instruction therefore it should be conscious.
YOUR question asks; How does the 'blind matter', which is not conscious, behave accordingly?
I informed you that; IF 'instructions' are built within matter, then that is HOW 'blind matter' behaves accordingly.
Some how you keep misconstruing this.
Why "SHOULD" matter "NOW" be aware of subjective instruction? YOUR very question is in relation to matter that is not conscious, and therefore NOT aware. Only conscious beings are AWARE of things. 'Blind matter', which you define as being
matter which is not conscious would obviously NOT be aware of any thing. 'Blind matter' by YOUR OWN definition is matter that is NOT conscious or NOT aware.
Conscious beings are not only the only thing AWARE of subjective instructions they are also the only ones who make subjective instructions. How you can misconstrue my answer, and then why you would say "matter SHOULD be aware of subjective instruction", when YOUR OWN question is specifically in relation to non-conscious matter is rather unusual.
bahman wrote: ↑Sat Feb 02, 2019 3:05 pmOne can ask how an objective instruction behave in specific way and assuming that there is another objective instruction leads to infinite regress.
You could ask such a stupid and ridiculous question if you like, but YOUR question now has nothing at all to do with my answer. Before you jump ahead to other matters, based on your own assumptions, better you stay back and understand what it is that I am actually saying before you get to far ahead of your self.
An 'objective instruction' does NOT behave in any specific way. Instructions do NOT behave nor do they do anything else other than what they do, which by definition is, they instruct. Just like the objective instructions built within dna INSTRUCTS the genes of a specific species to behave in a certain way, the instructions, themselves, do NOT behave nor do anything else other than just INSTRUCT.
You are free to infinitely regress, as much and as often as you like, but there is absolutely NO reason to do so. If you inquired about what I actually said instead of making assumptions and jumping to conclusion, based on your own assumptions, then you would not arrive at ridiculous conclusions like you have here.