Scientific logic. / by Socratus /

How does science work? And what's all this about quantum mechanics?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

User avatar
Cerveny
Posts: 574
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 9:35 pm
Location: Czech Republic
Contact:

Re: Scientific logic. / by Socratus /

Post by Cerveny » Tue Sep 20, 2016 2:03 pm

socratus wrote:Logic ?

Every particle is accompanied by an antiparticle.
It signifies that a certain equilibrium (of the structure of regular physical space) is dislocated during their creation
Collectively, antiparticles are known as antimatter.
So, the Universe is a mixture of matter and antimatter.
When a particle encounters an antiparticle, mutual
annihilation results, with the release of all the locked-up energy.
It means, that billions and billions particles-antiparticles wouldn’t
allow to gather all masses of Universe into big-bang’s singular point.
There is only one possibility: or antiparticles don’t exist or
big-bang’s singular point never was created.
===…
Antimatter has a high probability of different gravitational properties and therefore may be dispersed in space or concentrated, pushed into its remote areas...

User avatar
socratus
Posts: 628
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 7:00 am
Location: Israel
Contact:

Re: Scientific logic. / by Socratus /

Post by socratus » Fri Sep 23, 2016 7:13 am

Logic . . . . ?!

Everybody takes it for granted that all material things must be
somewhere and each particle must have a definite place of location.
After all, how can a particle truly exist if it isn’t somewhere?
Bat big bang’s singular point doesn’t have location, doesn’t
have reference frame according to the physicists opinion.
Without location, without reference frame singular point / big bang
is a new bible story. Without reference frame the so-called theory is
only a scientific fiction. Trying to understand their own invention
physicists say that here human’s rational, logical common sense
“collapsed into oblivion”, “commonsense notions are shattered”.
#
If someone cannot understand the Existence, it doesn’t mean that
Nature is absurd. We simple need a new theory which is based on
commonsense notions. It means:
a) The theory needs reference frame.
b) The theory of quantum particle needs geometrical form.
====…

User avatar
Cerveny
Posts: 574
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 9:35 pm
Location: Czech Republic
Contact:

Re: Scientific logic. / by Socratus /

Post by Cerveny » Fri Sep 23, 2016 8:15 pm

If we want to introduce logic into physics, we would promptly leave such nonsense as is the concept of "expanding" space. What on earth would expand? Elementary particles? Their time-size? Atoms? (why not?) Planck cells? Time? Metric? (What it is? Math? Nothing?)... Why just electrons, protons, neutrons, muons, ect. have been created? In this regard, there should be no restrictions!
Another example of the lack of logic is a deterministic model of the world. It misses sense, meaning and even relationship with the proclaimed growth entropy...

User avatar
socratus
Posts: 628
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 7:00 am
Location: Israel
Contact:

Re: Scientific logic. / by Socratus /

Post by socratus » Sat Sep 24, 2016 7:19 am

The essence of motion.
==..
There are two states of love:
a) The state “I love”
b) The state “ to be loved”
Everybody knows that they are two different states.

There are two states of motion:
a) The state “I move” (self-motion)
b) The state “ to be moved”
Everybody knows that they are two different states.

#
What set particles / objects in motion?
a) Newton’s theory explains movement as subject of
“ to be moved”: outwards forces set objects in motion,
b) Quantum theory explains movement as subject of “ I move”
(self-motion): internal forces (h and h*) set particles in motion.
This deference doesn’t understand in Physics.

#
Newtonian macro-world was created from quantum micro-world.
It means that the source of all motion and change in Nature is
quantum’s own self-impulses: h and h*
====…

User avatar
Cerveny
Posts: 574
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 9:35 pm
Location: Czech Republic
Contact:

Re: Scientific logic. / by Socratus /

Post by Cerveny » Sat Sep 24, 2016 12:24 pm

The quantum world is responsible for irreversibility and indeterminism of the Universe. On the quantum level the needs at solution of development are downgraded to the keeping the same density of probability (not discrete values) of initial / border conditions during interactions ("measurement") only. Nobody is able to determine the exact, e.g. time of decay of particular neutron...

User avatar
socratus
Posts: 628
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 7:00 am
Location: Israel
Contact:

Re: Scientific logic. / by Socratus /

Post by socratus » Sun Sep 25, 2016 8:50 am

socratus wrote:The essence of motion.
==..
There are two states of love:
a) The state “I love”
b) The state “ to be loved”
Everybody knows that they are two different states.

There are two states of motion:
a) The state “I move” (self-motion)
b) The state “ to be moved”
Everybody knows that they are two different states.

#
What set particles / objects in motion?
a) Newton’s theory explains movement as subject of
“ to be moved”: outwards forces set objects in motion,
b) Quantum theory explains movement as subject of “ I move”
(self-motion): internal forces (h and h*) set particles in motion.
This deference doesn’t understand in Physics.

#
Newtonian macro-world was created from quantum micro-world.
It means that the source of all motion and change in Nature is
quantum’s own self-impulses: h and h*
====…
Newtonian macro-world was created from quantum micro-world.
It means that the source of all motion and change in Nature is
quantum’s own self-impulses: h and h*
This situation doesn’t understand in Physics.
====…
Newton wrote:
“‘For the basic problem of philosophy seems to be to discover
the forces of nature from the phenomena of motions and then
to demonstrate the other phenomena from these forces.”
===..
It means to take the quantum forces of nature h and h* and then
try to demonstrate all the other phenomena from these forces.
===..
Israel Sadovnik Socratus.
====…

User avatar
socratus
Posts: 628
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 7:00 am
Location: Israel
Contact:

Re: Scientific logic. / by Socratus /

Post by socratus » Tue Sep 27, 2016 7:34 pm

The Multiverse and Gods.
======…
There are many spaces in Physics.
a) SRT has Minkowski spacetime.
b) Quantum mechanics first of all is h (!) and h (!)
was born from the Kirchhoff 's space - “black body”
c) String theory . . .
Oh ! String theory is very rich, it has many spaces:
11-D space, 27-D space, M-D space . . .
d) Astrophysics . . . (!)
Astrophysics has the strongest space – Black Hole:
everything that Big Bang created - Black Hole swallows.
#
There are many different Gods too: Brahman, Yahweh , Allah, Tao, Logos . . .
#
It seems, that the best way to solve the problem “The Multiverse and Gods “
is to give to every God its own Scientific space.
============…
Attachments
GOD and Multiverse.png
GOD and Multiverse.png (119.23 KiB) Viewed 1757 times

User avatar
TSBU
Posts: 824
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2016 5:46 pm

Re: Scientific logic. / by Socratus /

Post by TSBU » Thu Sep 29, 2016 8:52 pm

socratus wrote:The Multiverse and Gods.
======…
There are many spaces in Physics.
a) SRT has Minkowski spacetime.
b) Quantum mechanics first of all is h (!) and h (!)
was born from the Kirchhoff 's space - “black body”
c) String theory . . .
Oh ! String theory is very rich, it has many spaces:
11-D space, 27-D space, M-D space . . .
d) Astrophysics . . . (!)
Astrophysics has the strongest space – Black Hole:
everything that Big Bang created - Black Hole swallows.
#
There are many different Gods too: Brahman, Yahweh , Allah, Tao, Logos . . .
#
It seems, that the best way to solve the problem “The Multiverse and Gods “
is to give to every God its own Scientific space.
============…
Image

User avatar
socratus
Posts: 628
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 7:00 am
Location: Israel
Contact:

Re: Scientific logic. / by Socratus /

Post by socratus » Fri Sep 30, 2016 8:44 am

The essence of SRT and QED.
===…
a) SRT.
SRT explains behavior of photon / electron in vacuum.
b) QED.
QED explains interaction of photon / electron with matter.
=========…
Israel Sadovnik Socratus.
==========…

osgart
Posts: 512
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2016 7:38 am

Re: Scientific logic. / by Socratus /

Post by osgart » Tue Oct 18, 2016 10:04 pm

what is false is equally important as what is true. Not only that but when so is and when not so the condition be it relative or absolute is crucial. If logic is complete answers abound. Otherwise it is a gap yet to test and prove. Once logic is complete run the antithesis and all the differentials of that logic. If you dont get complete logic after that try else as missing value(s). Every puzzle is a whole of something. Everything is as per. Symbolize the measurable concepts as your missing values. If it is not testable hold it to logical mathematic reasoning and see if you can find hypothetical values that might be measurable using inference and deductive reasoning. Without relationship you have nothing.

osgart
Posts: 512
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2016 7:38 am

Re: Scientific logic. / by Socratus /

Post by osgart » Wed Oct 19, 2016 1:16 am

and it has to be testable. Lhc is a test facility not useless whatsoever. If you cant test it
,it is not science.
Logic is very reliable if true and complete. Yet i feel math could become an exact science someday. But it would have to be exact about everything.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests