String particle –--> LHC –--> multi-D

=.

Today some famous physicists think that “string particle”

can be a primary particle of nature and “string theory” can offer

a new description of nature. But to observe “string-particle”

would require a LHC roughly the size of the solar system.

Obviously that such solar- LHC cannot be created today, but . . . .

. . . but in the future . . . . in future . . . vivat solar-LHC.

======…

Not scientific joke.

A little boy was asked what he wants.

The boy answered: I want the Moon as big as the Sun,

then I will not afraid of darkness.

Scientific no- joke.

A young scientist was asked what he wants.

The young scientist answered: I want a LHC roughly the size

of the solar system then the „ string particle“ will be observed and then

I will exactly know in which dimension I live , in 11-D or i n 27-D

or , maybe, in the middle between them, (M-string theory).

=======...

## String particle –--> LHC –--> multi-D

### Re: String particle –--> LHC –--> multi-D

April 7, 2016 12:00 pm JST

=====…

Superstring theory is inspiring practical applications

http://asia.nikkei.com/magazine/2016040 ... plications

====…

The post doesn’t have examples of “string’s” practical/experimental applications.

===..

Experiment and mathematical analysis, taken together, they are serving

as the backbone of science. Experiment without mathematical analysis

is unclear, and mathematical analysis without experimental support is

only mathematical play.

===…

“Without a direct test for string theory, skeptics argue,

it should be classified as mathematics rather than physics . . . .”

/ Dan Falk /

“I don’t think it’s physics yet. It’s beautiful mathematics,

which has a chance of becoming physics”

/ Glenn Starkman /

“String theory says nothing about the real world”

/ Sheldon Glashow”

==================..

=====…

Superstring theory is inspiring practical applications

http://asia.nikkei.com/magazine/2016040 ... plications

====…

The post doesn’t have examples of “string’s” practical/experimental applications.

===..

Experiment and mathematical analysis, taken together, they are serving

as the backbone of science. Experiment without mathematical analysis

is unclear, and mathematical analysis without experimental support is

only mathematical play.

===…

“Without a direct test for string theory, skeptics argue,

it should be classified as mathematics rather than physics . . . .”

/ Dan Falk /

“I don’t think it’s physics yet. It’s beautiful mathematics,

which has a chance of becoming physics”

/ Glenn Starkman /

“String theory says nothing about the real world”

/ Sheldon Glashow”

==================..

### Re: String particle –--> LHC –--> multi-D

“String” doesn’t have practical applications / observation and therefore

it is only a pure “ beautiful mathematics”. String theory has only MATHEMATICAL implications of relativity and QM.

==========...

Mathematics is a “queen of science”

But she is a “queen” only because she married the

” king of science ” – physics

Without “king” she can be a ” mad woman”

On the other hand, sometime “she” can make her “husband ” crazy

Therefore Josiah Willard Gibbs wrote:

” Mathematician may say all that he wants,

but physicist must maintain at least some spark of common sense “.

And Feynman had the same opinion:

” Since the mathematical physicists have taken over, theoretical

physics has gone to pot. The bizarre concepts generated out of

the over use and misinterpretation of mathematics would be funny

if it were not for the tragedy of the waste in time, manpower, money,

and the resulting misdirection”

======================. ..

it is only a pure “ beautiful mathematics”. String theory has only MATHEMATICAL implications of relativity and QM.

==========...

Mathematics is a “queen of science”

But she is a “queen” only because she married the

” king of science ” – physics

Without “king” she can be a ” mad woman”

On the other hand, sometime “she” can make her “husband ” crazy

Therefore Josiah Willard Gibbs wrote:

” Mathematician may say all that he wants,

but physicist must maintain at least some spark of common sense “.

And Feynman had the same opinion:

” Since the mathematical physicists have taken over, theoretical

physics has gone to pot. The bizarre concepts generated out of

the over use and misinterpretation of mathematics would be funny

if it were not for the tragedy of the waste in time, manpower, money,

and the resulting misdirection”

======================. ..

### Re: String particle –--> LHC –--> multi-D

I don't see any relevance of these physics models with Philosophy.

### Re: String particle –--> LHC –--> multi-D

Math is physics of ideas and physics is math of the matter...socratus wrote:“String” doesn’t have practical applications / observation and therefore

it is only a pure “ beautiful mathematics”. String theory has only MATHEMATICAL implications of relativity and QM.

==========...

Mathematics is a “queen of science”

But she is a “queen” only because she married the

” king of science ” – physics

Without “king” she can be a ” mad woman”

On the other hand, sometime “she” can make her “husband ” crazy

Therefore Josiah Willard Gibbs wrote:

” Mathematician may say all that he wants,

but physicist must maintain at least some spark of common sense “.

And Feynman had the same opinion:

” Since the mathematical physicists have taken over, theoretical

physics has gone to pot. The bizarre concepts generated out of

the over use and misinterpretation of mathematics would be funny

if it were not for the tragedy of the waste in time, manpower, money,

and the resulting misdirection”

======================. ..

### Re: String particle –--> LHC –--> multi-D

The “philosophical stone” in this post is hidden in the question:yiostheoy wrote:I don't see any relevance of these physics models with Philosophy.

Is “string” physical or only mathematical searching?

The answer can be one:

“ String” is only mathematical not physical searching because

practically is impossible to observe “string particle”

( length = 10^-33cm, without thickness).

=================…

### Re: String particle –--> LHC –--> multi-D

Hidden yes.socratus wrote:The “philosophical stone” in this post is hidden in the question:yiostheoy wrote:I don't see any relevance of these physics models with Philosophy.

Is “string” physical or only mathematical searching?

The answer can be one:

“ String” is only mathematical not physical searching because

practically is impossible to observe “string particle”

( length = 10^-33cm, without thickness).

=================…

Girlie cryptic.