Please delete this

How does science work? And what's all this about quantum mechanics?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

User avatar
GreatandWiseTrixie
Posts: 1547
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2015 9:51 pm

Re: Are we eternal? (Eternal Recurrence)

Post by GreatandWiseTrixie »

Lev Muishkin wrote:
.... the past is not a place.
And a "place"...is? For it is only a memory, something you sense in your mind...
Nibbana
Posts: 20
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2014 2:24 pm

Re: Are we eternal? (Eternal Recurrence)

Post by Nibbana »

Lev Muishkin wrote:
Nibbana wrote:
Lev Muishkin wrote:
The grammar is perfect, except the second 'we' ought to have a capital. My apologies.
You have the essence of the meaning.

What makes me is a unique and complex structure of matter. Not the atoms that form the structure.
Romeo and Juliet is not the Latin alphabet, but the order in which the letters of that alphabet are gathered. If you separate the words and letters - you just get a pile of nonsense.

Humans have the same atoms as a dog, a banana or a cat: mostly C, O, H, N, a little P and P, some Na and a few traces of other things.

We are not eternal, just because are atoms persist after our death. Death is the disorganisation of matter.


No. We are eternal. It's against the law of conservation of energy if we are not.

Right, after death we are disorganized. Our forms of human change. But we still exist in the new forms of matter. New forms of energy. We as a matter or energy are immortal. Matter or energy never dies. It just changes its form.

New things are actually the new forms of old things. Old things are actually the new forms of new things.

For example, I bought a new chair. What is it? It's now the combination of old things, ie wood, nails, etc. After five years, that chair will change. It will be old, of course, new form.
You are being ridiculous. Information can be lost forever, this does not transgress the laws of nature.

It does not matter a dingo's kidney about matter and energy.
You chair is only comprised of atoms. It is the atoms that remain, not the chair. Burn the chair! You can't get it back, ever.
What makes you, you is the information, not the atoms which are the same as any chair.
Haha. You are ridiculous. I'm not information. I'm matter or energy. I have mass and volume. Information is just part of me.

Information may be lost, but not forever. It's still there in genes. It can be transmitted from generation to generation.

Yeah, I may not get the chair back. But the chair still remains. But it's not called chair. It just changes its form.

A sperm and an egg made me. Apparently, I'm not information. And I'm immortal because my sperm( I'm male and straight) will make another 'I' that is called a son or a daughter. I will be part of him or her. I will always be part of my great great great...
grandkids. I'm obviously eternal. Haha.
User avatar
Lev Muishkin
Posts: 399
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2014 11:21 pm

Re: Are we eternal? (Eternal Recurrence)

Post by Lev Muishkin »

Nibbana wrote: Information may be lost, but not forever. It's still there in genes. It can be transmitted from generation to generation.

Yeah, I may not get the chair back. But the chair still remains. But it's not called chair. It just changes its form.

A sperm and an egg made me. Apparently, I'm not information. And I'm immortal because my sperm( I'm male and straight) will make another 'I' that is called a son or a daughter. I will be part of him or her. I will always be part of my great great great...
grandkids. I'm obviously eternal. Haha.
Why do you fear being put in a blander then? If you are not your unique organisation of matter then you would not fear falling under a road roller. But you do. Because you know you are nothing without your structure.
Your great greats are dead as door nails. You are living a childish myth born of your fear of death and the inevitable nothingness.
You child will forget you when they die. You will be not even dust and ashes.

Allow me to disavow you of your notion of genes.

The genes you are born with and the same ones you die with. Your life makes no difference to their structure. "YOU" cannot change the information in your genes. Your sperm cells are only half of that, they loose their integrity when they recombine with a female.
You do not affect or change your genes in your lifetime. You are nothing but a carrier for that information. Everything that makes you you, is coded in the structure of your brain, all of which is utterly lost upon death; your learning , experiences and hopes and fears.
This is the same for us all whether or not we have children.
User avatar
Immanuel Can
Posts: 22257
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:42 pm

Re: Are we eternal? (Eternal Recurrence)

Post by Immanuel Can »

Let's take a slightly different angle on this question:

From where do we get the *idea* of eternity?

After all, empirically speaking, all we see on every side is things slowly decaying, dissolving and ceasing to exist. The whole world is that way. Everything is clearly on a linear track downhill. Scientists tell us that it is inevitable; not just us, but all our relatives, the whole species, the entire universe, and all energy in it is destined to one thing -- heat death. That means the state in which the universe contains nothing but a thin soup of equally-dispersed energy particles, and no new creative or generative action is even possible, forever. Dark, eternal, unrelenting night.

If this is so, then talking about being "eternal" through reincarnation, or through your future generations, or even through cycling multiverses is simple nonsense -- these are all speculations at best, and at worse they are mere parlour tricks to keep your mind from thinking about the truth.

But if that's so (and hard-nosed empiricism surely takes us there), then what is the empirical explanation for us having any "sense of eternity," or even being able to formulate the concept in the first place? We have just said that "real eternality" is impossible, from a scientific perspective: so we cannot have gotten the idea itself from the "empirical."

So why and how do we even know what "eternity" is?
User avatar
GreatandWiseTrixie
Posts: 1547
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2015 9:51 pm

Re: Are we eternal? (Eternal Recurrence)

Post by GreatandWiseTrixie »

Immanuel Can wrote: That means the state in which the universe contains nothing but a thin soup of equally-dispersed energy particles, and no new creative or generative action is even possible, forever. Dark, eternal, unrelenting night.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5X3Rj2uLPgk
god i hope so
Nibbana
Posts: 20
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2014 2:24 pm

Re: Are we eternal? (Eternal Recurrence)

Post by Nibbana »

Lev Muishkin wrote:
Nibbana wrote: Information may be lost, but not forever. It's still there in genes. It can be transmitted from generation to generation.

Yeah, I may not get the chair back. But the chair still remains. But it's not called chair. It just changes its form.

A sperm and an egg made me. Apparently, I'm not information. And I'm immortal because my sperm( I'm male and straight) will make another 'I' that is called a son or a daughter. I will be part of him or her. I will always be part of my great great great...
grandkids. I'm obviously eternal. Haha.
Why do you fear being put in a blander then? If you are not your unique organisation of matter then you would not fear falling under a road roller. But you do. Because you know you are nothing without your structure.
Your great greats are dead as door nails. You are living a childish myth born of your fear of death and the inevitable nothingness.
You child will forget you when they die. You will be not even dust and ashes.

Allow me to disavow you of your notion of genes.

The genes you are born with and the same ones you die with. Your life makes no difference to their structure. "YOU" cannot change the information in your genes. Your sperm cells are only half of that, they loose their integrity when they recombine with a female.
You do not affect or change your genes in your lifetime. You are nothing but a carrier for that information. Everything that makes you you, is coded in the structure of your brain, all of which is utterly lost upon death; your learning , experiences and hopes and fears.
This is the same for us all whether or not we have children.
You're completely wrong. Information in genes can be changed. That's why we can see human mutations in the world.

We have fear of death because we are naturally programmed to survive. But that doesn't mean everyone is afraid of dying. That's because, as I said, information in genes can be changed.

Why some people committed suicide? They weren't scared of death? Yes,they were. But their emotions changed information in genes. Survival wasn't needed any more. So they killed themselves.

As matter or energy, we never die. And our information always exist in genes. But it can be changed by many things such as emotions or environment.
surreptitious57
Posts: 4257
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 6:09 am

Re: Are we eternal? (Eternal Recurrence)

Post by surreptitious57 »

I only operate within the limitations of what I actually know to be true with respect to how I perceive reality. And
one of the things I do know in relation to that is that that one day I shall die and that from that point on I shall no
longer experience consciousness so anything that happens to my physical state after that is therefore academic as
far as I am concerned. So by default is discussing the removal of existence since that is actually impossible. I work
with what is possible not with what is not and so for me it is no more than an interesting philosophical question as
I already said but not one grounded in reality. And argument from emotion does not make it any more valid either
Dalek Prime
Posts: 4922
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:48 am
Location: Living in a tree with Polly.

Re: Are we eternal? (Eternal Recurrence)

Post by Dalek Prime »

Nibbana wrote:
A sperm and an egg made me. Apparently, I'm not information. And I'm immortal because my sperm( I'm male and straight) will make another 'I' that is called a son or a daughter. I will be part of him or her. I will always be part of my great great great...
grandkids. I'm obviously eternal. Haha.
You are not you then. You are your forebear. Just another iteration of something before you, as will be your kids, by your account. So, either you are you, and mortal, or you are a distant immortal forbear. Which is it?

(My pardon if this has been covered)
thedoc
Posts: 6473
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 4:18 pm

Re: Are we eternal? (Eternal Recurrence)

Post by thedoc »

Dalek Prime wrote:
Nibbana wrote:
A sperm and an egg made me. Apparently, I'm not information. And I'm immortal because my sperm( I'm male and straight) will make another 'I' that is called a son or a daughter. I will be part of him or her. I will always be part of my great great great...
grandkids. I'm obviously eternal. Haha.
You are not you then. You are your forebear. Just another iteration of something before you, as will be your kids, by your account. So, either you are you, and mortal, or you are a distant immortal forbear. Which is it?

(My pardon if this has been covered)

The elements of your body have been around since the beginning, the Big Bang, and will continue for a very long time. In the beginning there was mostly Hydrogen and a little Helium, but over time some of that has been combine and converted into heavier elements, and here you are now, and your elements will continue to exist for a very long time. Yes, you, or your parts, are going to be around forever, eternity is another matter altogether. Temporal existence is not eternal, but it can last forever.
Dalek Prime
Posts: 4922
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:48 am
Location: Living in a tree with Polly.

Re: Are we eternal? (Eternal Recurrence)

Post by Dalek Prime »

thedoc wrote:
Dalek Prime wrote:
Nibbana wrote:
A sperm and an egg made me. Apparently, I'm not information. And I'm immortal because my sperm( I'm male and straight) will make another 'I' that is called a son or a daughter. I will be part of him or her. I will always be part of my great great great...
grandkids. I'm obviously eternal. Haha.
You are not you then. You are your forebear. Just another iteration of something before you, as will be your kids, by your account. So, either you are you, and mortal, or you are a distant immortal forbear. Which is it?

(My pardon if this has been covered)

The elements of your body have been around since the beginning, the Big Bang, and will continue for a very long time. In the beginning there was mostly Hydrogen and a little Helium, but over time some of that has been combine and converted into heavier elements, and here you are now, and your elements will continue to exist for a very long time. Yes, you, or your parts, are going to be around forever, eternity is another matter altogether. Temporal existence is not eternal, but it can last forever.
I'm familiar with big bang nucleosynthesis, and later stellar nucleosynthesis. I'm also familiar with conservation of matter and energy. I agree that these elements have been around, and will always be, give or take. But that's not what I was talking about. I was referring specifically to this fellow saying about his sperm making another him. And I said it wasn't him. Please read it again.

The concept of immortality through procreation is silly. Yes, the elemental building blocks are "forever". Hence the saying "we are stardust". But I am not my father. And my father is not his father. Even genetically. Every generation dilutes, like a half-life.
thedoc
Posts: 6473
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 4:18 pm

Re: Are we eternal? (Eternal Recurrence)

Post by thedoc »

Dalek Prime wrote:
thedoc wrote:
Dalek Prime wrote: You are not you then. You are your forebear. Just another iteration of something before you, as will be your kids, by your account. So, either you are you, and mortal, or you are a distant immortal forbear. Which is it?

(My pardon if this has been covered)

The elements of your body have been around since the beginning, the Big Bang, and will continue for a very long time. In the beginning there was mostly Hydrogen and a little Helium, but over time some of that has been combine and converted into heavier elements, and here you are now, and your elements will continue to exist for a very long time. Yes, you, or your parts, are going to be around forever, eternity is another matter altogether. Temporal existence is not eternal, but it can last forever.
I'm familiar with big bang nucleosynthesis, and later stellar nucleosynthesis. I'm also familiar with conservation of matter and energy. I agree that these elements have been around, and will always be, give or take. But that's not what I was talking about. I was referring specifically to this fellow saying about his sperm making another him. And I said it wasn't him. Please read it again.

The concept of immortality through procreation is silly. Yes, the elemental building blocks are "forever". Hence the saying "we are stardust". But I am not my father. And my father is not his father. Even genetically. Every generation dilutes, like a half-life.
I read it correctly, I was just being a bit picky. You are correct each person is an individual, but also each person has some elements of their predecessors within them. So in a small way Nibbana is correct, and you are correct that you are not your father or grandfather exactly, only a little bit.
Dalek Prime
Posts: 4922
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:48 am
Location: Living in a tree with Polly.

Re: Are we eternal? (Eternal Recurrence)

Post by Dalek Prime »

I think I can agree with that, Doctor Picky. :wink:
Ezra
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2017 2:27 am

Re: Are we eternal? (Eternal Recurrence)

Post by Ezra »

Immanuel Can wrote: Thu Feb 19, 2015 5:07 pm
But if that's so (and hard-nosed empiricism surely takes us there), then what is the empirical explanation for us having any "sense of eternity," or even being able to formulate the concept in the first place? We have just said that "real eternality" is impossible, from a scientific perspective: so we cannot have gotten the idea itself from the "empirical."

So why and how do we even know what "eternity" is?
It’s possible that we don’t. Human beings have a hard time conceptualising it, let alone defining it. In fact, we have a hard if not impossible time defining anything satisfactorily, which is why arguably no philosophical question has ever been ultimately answered to everyone’s satisfaction. We simply have satisfying questions and paradoxes to play with and delight in over tea, coffee, a beer, glass of wine, toke or tab.

“Eternity” is an attempt to grasp at the unknown; a human drive to lockdown, understand, pigeonhole. And a failure to do so.
User avatar
Immanuel Can
Posts: 22257
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:42 pm

Re: Are we eternal? (Eternal Recurrence)

Post by Immanuel Can »

Ezra wrote: Sun Oct 15, 2017 2:46 am
Immanuel Can wrote: Thu Feb 19, 2015 5:07 pm
But if that's so (and hard-nosed empiricism surely takes us there), then what is the empirical explanation for us having any "sense of eternity," or even being able to formulate the concept in the first place? We have just said that "real eternality" is impossible, from a scientific perspective: so we cannot have gotten the idea itself from the "empirical."

So why and how do we even know what "eternity" is?
It’s possible that we don’t.
In a sense, yes -- if by "know" we mean, "know comprehensively." How could any finite entity "know" eternity in that way? We don't even know the oceans on our own planet in that way...let alone the universe, or time itself.

But in another sense, no, it's not possible we don't. By this I mean "know as a concept," not "know comprehensively." For indisputably, we DO have the concept, even if we don't have comprehensive knowledge of all it implies. We use the concept pretty routinely, actually.

My question is really how we got any concept that has absolutely no empirical reality from which we could possibly derive it by observation.
User avatar
attofishpi
Posts: 9956
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
Location: Orion Spur
Contact:

Re: Are we eternal? (Eternal Recurrence)

Post by attofishpi »

therammo wrote: Thu Jan 29, 2015 1:50 pm If we live in a multiverse that indicates eternal inflation, does it mean we actually live over and over again the same life?
I fucking hope not.
Post Reply