Then be clear instead of hiding in the bush .Resha Caner wrote:I don't like to be misrepresented.Greatest I am wrote:Don't like to answer questions do you?
Regards
DL
Then be clear instead of hiding in the bush .Resha Caner wrote:I don't like to be misrepresented.Greatest I am wrote:Don't like to answer questions do you?
You've never dealt with complexity before? What is it you think I'm hiding?Greatest I am wrote:Then be clear instead of hiding in the bush.
Add this question to your list of answers from my questions above and you will get your answer.Resha Caner wrote:You've never dealt with complexity before? What is it you think I'm hiding?Greatest I am wrote:Then be clear instead of hiding in the bush.
If someone insisted that you're "hiding" by calling death undesirable rather than evil, would that person be correct or would they be misrepresenting you?
Sigh. OK, so you think me a devious person. I didn't want a discussion of "infallible" to derail the thread, but it already has so I guess it doesn't matter.Greatest I am wrote:Add this question to your list of answers from my questions above and you will get your answer.
Reciprocity is fair play where I come from and BTW, whhat you are showing is hardly what I would call complexity.
So all the various, thousands of various bibles are wrong except your cults.Resha Caner wrote:Sigh. OK, so you think me a devious person. I didn't want a discussion of "infallible" to derail the thread, but it already has so I guess it doesn't matter.Greatest I am wrote:Add this question to your list of answers from my questions above and you will get your answer.
Reciprocity is fair play where I come from and BTW, whhat you are showing is hardly what I would call complexity.
God is infallible and he inspires scripture. That is what scripture claims for itself, and that is where I would stop if the discussion were simple.
Can a Bible be corrupted? Sure. Look at all the people who have written their own versions of it - Thomas Jefferson, Mark Twain, and Joseph Smith spring to mind. Can it be misinterpreted? Sure. Look at all the different ideas that come out of Revelation. Not all of them can be right.
But if God can't overcome such things, he is a very small god indeed. So, if God is who the Bible claims him to be, then there must be a canon in existance that conveys his message. I believe the canon acknowledged by confessional Lutheranism to be the inspired Word of God - what most people would call the Protestant Bible.
If that doesn't answer the question, I'll elaborate more.
I don't believe God does evil.Greatest I am wrote:Sodom's destruction including children and babies was not evil?
The genocide in Noah's day was not evil?
God hardening Pharaoh's soft heart so that he could flex his wath by murdering children instead of the parents, the innocent instead of the guilty, was not evil?
Because they disobeyed.Greatest I am wrote:Then why punish A & E.
If, like Adam and Eve, my child tried to hide from me what had happened, yes I would punish them for the attempted deception.Greatest I am wrote:Would you punish your child if deceived by a more powerful force?
Yes.Greatest I am wrote:Was God punishing A & E justified if an angel who God allowed in the garden was the true evil force?
I don't know.Greatest I am wrote:What then was the purpose?
Again, it doesn't say God gave that power.Greatest I am wrote:Revelation 12:9
So the great dragon was cast out, that serpent of old, called the Devil and Satan, who deceives the whole world; he was cast to the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.
Hello, Resha..Resha Caner wrote:There is a long list of differences between me and DL. I'm sure this is one of them. However, each one of those differences is likely a very lengthy discussion. I'm willing to have that discussion, but before we spin off into this, might I ask what prompted your question?mtmynd1 wrote:Seeing as there is quite a bit of bible being tossed about, do you, DL and Resha, both believe the Bible to be written by (a) god? And if so, is the Bible infallible in what is written?