The absolute God (Nirguna Brahman).

Is there a God? If so, what is She like?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Post Reply
dattaswami
Posts: 652
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 11:42 am

The absolute God (Nirguna Brahman).

Post by dattaswami »

UNIMAGINABILITY OF GOD LED TO MULTIPLE SCHOOLS OF PHILOSOPHY


Shankara told that the awareness, which is filtered from all types of thoughts and left over with a single thought that it is awareness, is the absolute God (Nirguna Brahman). All the thoughts can be classified into three types, which are called as Trigunas. Awareness, aware of itself is a thought by itself, which is the inherent characteristic of the awareness and is called as awareness in general. Sattvam is one of the three types of thoughts. The type Sattvam represents all good and divine thoughts. The general awareness (jnanam) is also included in this first category i.e., Sattvam. The word knowledge (jnanam) basically means to know something including itself. The word jnanam is fixed (rudha) in special knowledge but it can be taken in this basic sense (yoga) also.

The basic material of every thought is general awareness. Therefore, the basis of all the three types of thoughts is general awareness, which should not be confined to the first type only. Based on this logic, Shakara isolated the general awareness from the three types of thoughts and called it as absolute God. Hence, the absolute God is above the three types of thoughts (Trigunas) and hence, called as Nirguna Brahman. This word means that the absolute God is beyond and separate from the three Gunas. But, the general awareness itself is a specific work form of the inert energy only, which is generated from the oxidation of food. The general awareness disappears in deep sleep and appears in the awaken state. Hence, the general awareness has daily birth and daily death as said in the Gita (Nitya jaatam…). You cannot call the general awareness as thoughtless entity and claim that it is beyond all the thoughts or Gunas. The thoughtless entity is the inert energy in deep sleep and therefore, cannot be the awareness. If you say that the awareness is thoughtless, the awareness itself disappears and becomes inert energy. It is just like saying that the lump of gold is formless and the ornaments only have the form. This view is allowed in normal way but the sharp analysis shows that the lump of gold also has some form, which may be irregular. Therefore, the general awareness can be allowed to be beyond all the thoughts (gunas) in such normal way.

What is the reason for Shankara to do all this exercise and promote the general awareness to the state of absolute God? Shankara knows very well that absolute God is unimaginable (Mouna Vyaakhya Prakatita…). ‘Unimaginable’ means that it is beyond awareness and also beyond inert entities. You cannot even imagine God and where is the possibility of attaining or becoming God? In such case, there is a free license to attribute any imaginable item as the absolute God and the license should be appreciated if some good purpose is served. If I say that a specific imaginable item is the unimaginable God, you can never negate My proposal. The reason is that you yourself cannot prove and define the unimaginable God on your side. When you cannot establish something, you cannot oppose anything.

The unimaginable status of the absolute God creates the pre-license to name any imaginable item as absolute God. This is the reason for the multiplicity of the schools of philosophy. Each school proposes some imaginable item as the absolute God according to its liking. This is the reason for the evolution of several religions and several schools of thoughts in the same religion. This is the basis for all the ‘sacred quarrels’! The reason is that the basic free license cannot be opposed by anybody since you cannot define the absolute God before opposing somebody. However, this free license is appreciated if some good purpose is served. The same free license should be condemned by the powerful logic establishing the unimaginable nature of God as the generator of the space in the context of avoiding these sacred quarrels, which lead to unsacred harmful results. Therefore, Shankara can be appreciated since He selected the general awareness as absolute God. It was necessary for Him since everybody became atheist by denying the existence of God based on the reason of unimaginable nature. Some imaginable item should be selected as absolute God to deny atheism. The atheists (Buddhists) concluded that everything is nothing based on the concept of relativity. In the force of relativity, the basis also became nothing. The theory of relativity became endless. Then, Shankara proposed the existence of awareness to grasp this relativity. Otherwise, the relativity itself becomes nothing. If the awareness is non-existent, this ‘nothing’ becomes nothing since nothing is not established, which is not grasped by the awareness. By this logic, Shankara stopped the endless concept of relativity at the basis of awareness. Awareness was used as the temporary stop gap by Shankara to stop the endless relativity, the result of which is endless nothing (Shunya).

Psychological Treatment of Patients by Advaita

Apart from the above essential good aspect, another good aspect is to remove the strain of tensions and to introduce perfect detachment and confidence in the case of general public. Everybody was strained by the mental tension, which is the result of continuous thoughts. When the thoughtless awareness is set to be God, everybody tried to enter this state of awareness without thoughts. This gives perfect rest to mind and mental strain is removed. Everybody gets attracted because such a state is the absolute God and you also become God by such state!

By keeping yourself in such state, you become God and you need not crave for worldly things.
By becoming God, you need not aspire for anything because you have attained everything.
This leads to the detachment from the worldly things and avoids lot of sin in the society.
This also gives full confidence and full satisfaction to the self because you have become the highest omnipotent God!

All this is the psychological treatment for the mental patients and every human being is a psychotic patient in reality. Shankara, the human incarnation of God is the psychiatrist, who came down to cure His children from the mental illness. Most of the people follow Advaita Philosophy for these good benefits only and we need not condemn this philosophy in the view of establishment of truth and spoil these good benefits given by Shankara to the society. But, once the human being is cured from these mental defects, the truth must be established so that it can progress in the true spiritual path to attain the ultimate grace of God. You must distinguish the mental patients attracted by the Advaita Philosophy from the greedy lot of human beings to become the highest God resulting in egoistic demons. We should sympathize with the first group and not reveal the truth. You must open the truth to the second group and rectify them.
User avatar
Agent Smith
Posts: 1442
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2022 12:23 pm

Re: The absolute God (Nirguna Brahman).

Post by Agent Smith »

I can relate to the idea of an absolute god; the obvious pleonasm is a bit annoying though.

"Who took the cookie from the ..."

"the cookie jar, sir?"

"Yes, who took the cookie from the cookie jar?"

"I know sir, it was Peter Van Dook."

"That name sounds familiar. Hmmm. Peter Van Dook! Peter Van Dook! Come to the front of the class."

"Er ... sir, there's no one by the name Peter Van Dook in our class."

"You lied then Dorian, did you not?"

"No sir, it was Peter Van Dook, I swear, god is my witness!"

"There's no Peter Van Dook on the student roll. I just checked."

"Sir, I'm telling the truth! There's the portrait, under it Peter Van Dook (1868 - 1912) and I saw him, well not all of him, just his hand, the left one, reach into the cookie jar and take a cookie."

"Dorian, I'll need to talk to your parents. Please tell them to come to my office tomorrow at 10:00 AM."

"But why sir? I'm telling you it was Peter Van Dook who took the cookie ... from the ... from the ... cookie jar!"

"You know that's impossible right Dorian? Peter Van Dook's been dead for 50 years."

"Yes I know, but .. but ... "

"Shhh. Not a word, not one more word! Parents ... 10:00 AM ... in my office ... you too! Got that?"

"Yes sir."
alan1000
Posts: 313
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2012 10:03 am

Re: The absolute God (Nirguna Brahman).

Post by alan1000 »

I hate this kind of "literary" philosophy. I blame the European Existentialist tradition mainly. The correspondence between Hobbes and Descartes led to no resolution because Hobbes, the tough-minded realist, saw through the dilettante imposture of Cartesian Doubt...

If you have a point to make, what's wrong with stating it objectively, dispassionately, in the most concise vocabulary you can devise? Philosophy should not be a story from Golden Books.
Post Reply