An Omniscient God

Is there a God? If so, what is She like?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Dubious
Posts: 4000
Joined: Tue May 19, 2015 7:40 am

Re: An Omniscient God

Post by Dubious »

Dontaskme wrote: Fri Jul 01, 2022 9:46 am

The human mind cannot deal with that TRUTH, and is why it had no other option but to fall in love with it's own reflection, the make-belief character of it's own making, the stuff dreams are made of, where these imagined characters still exist today inside every human mind, a life of pure dreamscape of their own making, for any dream will do, as long as they are living the dream. The mind is always intent on living the dream life, because even a dream life is better than no life.

That's true. Humans have always preferred fictional scenarios, whether they be of a secular or scriptural origin, over non-fictional. Philosophy itself is not immune to chimeras which the mind imagines for itself. Often fiction is more certain of truth (whatever that means) than non-fiction in which truth more often exists as a variable that requires a solution even though its solution is usually of a temporary rhetorical nature.
User avatar
Dontaskme
Posts: 16940
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2016 2:07 pm
Location: Nowhere

Re: An Omniscient God

Post by Dontaskme »

Dubious wrote: Fri Jul 01, 2022 10:56 am
Dontaskme wrote: Fri Jul 01, 2022 9:46 am

The human mind cannot deal with that TRUTH, and is why it had no other option but to fall in love with it's own reflection, the make-belief character of it's own making, the stuff dreams are made of, where these imagined characters still exist today inside every human mind, a life of pure dreamscape of their own making, for any dream will do, as long as they are living the dream. The mind is always intent on living the dream life, because even a dream life is better than no life.

That's true. Humans have always preferred fictional scenarios, whether they be of a secular or scriptural origin, over non-fictional. Philosophy itself is not immune to chimeras which the mind imagines for itself. Often fiction is more certain of truth (whatever that means) than non-fiction in which truth more often exists as a variable that requires a solution even though its solution is usually of a temporary rhetorical nature.
Yeah,well said, Dubious.

The mind can only relate to itself, it's got no other form of reference in which to identify with. The mind's reflective nature can only project the illusion of self as a conceptual image of the imageless...in this artificial conception.


.
Phil8659
Posts: 396
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2022 11:50 am
Contact:

Re: An Omniscient God

Post by Phil8659 »

Dontaskme wrote: Wed Jun 08, 2022 7:21 am The Bible teaches that God is all-knowing or omniscient. When we say that God is omniscient it means that He has perfect knowledge of all things.


I guess that means your “free will” was another LIE
Apparently you have not even studied the Bible, like most who have a lot to say about something they have not bothered to study.
The Bible, repeatedly tells the reader that it is sealed to man's understanding until after a certain point in human history, and even plainly states that mankind will not even be able to read it.
So, show me that you even know what literacy is and its relationship to judgment? The Bible hides nothing, it does, however, take full advantage of language processing via common grammar. Can you even explain the difference between literal and metaphorical, say, in mathematical terms? Can you name a number of word pairs which denote the same concept?

And, if you are so arrogant as to believe you are literate, the Bible does put into the metaphor the biologically defined job of a mind, so that if you could read it, you can solve and show the solution to the Name of the Beast 666, which works out to be: To regulate behavior so as to turn the past into a future and to bring that future to pass. The Book shows you, at least four times, how to solve the metaphor. The exact purpose of grammar and how it is used for survival. You can call it judgment, predictive behavior, or prophecy, or even in another metaphor, The Testimony of Jesus is the Spirit of Prophecy. Now, it has nothing to do with rolling on the floor and spouting gibberish about being a prophet sent by gowd to make money preaching the word.

Now, I do not claim to be a computer expert, but I was trained by the military to work on classified electronics and have been a state certified electronics technician, not to mention worked as a beta tester for Microsoft because they asked me to. So, you would have a very hard time convincing me that binary recursion is different from the ability to turn a light bulb on and off. See if you can light up a bit.



All of the metaphors of the Bible resolve to simple biological fact, so, it proves you do not even know yourself.

And, if you are literate and could read: Adam and Eve are a Conjugate Binary Pair whereby Complete Induction and Deduction produce the human race.
Transform that using the definition of a thing as a relative and correlative.
A relative and correlative are a Conjugate Binary Pair whereby Complete Induction and Deduction produces the entire Universe.

Transform it again for grammar systems.
A relative and correlative are a Conjugate Binary pair whereby Complete Induction and Deduction produces every possible system of Grammar, even that of Common Grammar, Arithmetic Algebra and Geometry affording mankind the possibility of judgment.

Now, Transform it again, relative to your own computer

A relative and correlative are a Conjugate Binary pair whereby Complete Induction and Deduction produces every form of information processing, every output and behavior of a computer.

Plato called it dialectic, and you did not even understand him, what makes you believe you can understand the Bible, when it is clear you never even understood the definition of a thing itself?

You are not even bright enough to know you are wholly illiterate.

So, when the Bible informs you, that you cannot even read, do not even know the principles reading is based on, argue not with the Book, but with your own computer. Maybe you can claim you are its prophet?

Secondly, do you even know the difference between will and doing what pleases one? A dog and cat or other animals do what they please, but what is will? and how is it that people are so illiterate as to imagine that it means doing what one pleases?

Have you even studied the distinction, Plato show you the logical distinction? can you recall any of that argument?
Or, have you even studied Plato?

One can put it another way, is there any life support system of a living organism which does as it pleases, or is its behavior biologically and physically defined?
User avatar
Dontaskme
Posts: 16940
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2016 2:07 pm
Location: Nowhere

Re: An Omniscient God

Post by Dontaskme »

The brain manufacturers the existential illusory sense of self. A self that is a mechanistically functioning “phenomenal self-model “ that simulates a person.

Free will is an illusion. The content of the bible is a story comparable to a dream.

There’s just nothing being everything being nothing.

You cannot know who you really are, because then you would know there is nothing to know and nothing to know it.

Therefore, the artificial sense of self exists in a condition described as “ naive realism “

The sense of self has no say in what happens and is free to choose nothing.

Take it or leave it…there’s only what’s happening to no one and every one.
User avatar
Dontaskme
Posts: 16940
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2016 2:07 pm
Location: Nowhere

Re: An Omniscient God

Post by Dontaskme »

All that we see and seem is but a dream within a dream within a dream.
We sleep in the self and cannot awake.

Upon the artificial awakening…the sense of self totally collapses into the nothingness of its origin.

Everything spoken is nothing more than a barking dog, just completely unnecessary and annoying.

Silence is the language of God.
Post Reply