bobmax wrote: ↑Sat Jun 11, 2022 1:48 pm
Age,
Screaming no longer makes us right.
WHO, EXACTLY, is supposedly, 'screaming' here?
AND, WHEN did screaming, supposedly, make ANY one 'right'?
bobmax wrote: ↑Sat Jun 11, 2022 1:48 pm
English is not my native language, I'm not used to using neutral.
Neither are most of the english speaking people I have observed in the days when this is being written.
But so what?
If one does NOT express the ACTUAL and IRREFUTABLE Truth, especially on a philosophy forum, am I NOT allowed to, or NOT expected to, POINT OUT and SHOW the INCONSISTENCY or FLAW?
bobmax wrote: ↑Sat Jun 11, 2022 1:48 pm
And anyway I repeat, masculine, feminine, neutral are equivalent.
It is about the Absolute!
Which, to you, the 'Absolute' is a 'he', or male gendered 'thing', correct?
If no, then WHY call His some 'thing', which 'it' is NOT?
Oh, and by the way, WHEN was the FIRST TIME you, supposedly and allegedly, informed us here that "masculine, feminine, AND neutral are equivalent"?
bobmax wrote: ↑Sat Jun 11, 2022 1:48 pm
However, if you insist on details, it means that there is no effective dialogue.
WHY?
Are you NOT CAPABLE of just PROVIDING the ACTUAL 'details', which are needed to SHOW that you actually CAN back up and support your CLAIMS here?
Remember this IS a 'philosophy forum', and WHY should you NOT have to PROVIDE 'the details', which back up and support YOUR CLAIMS here?
EVERY one else HAS TO, and 'should', correct?
Also, I suggest if you can NOT provide supporting PROOF for your CLAIMS here, when you ARE CHALLENGED, then best you refrain from expressing those CLAIMS here, or just expressing them somewhere.
ONCE AGAIN, I will suggest that BEFORE ANY one makes a CLAIM here, that they have the IRREFUTABLE Facts READY FIRST.