Shut up you fucking ho whore slime ball kunt face.Age wrote: ↑Sat Jun 18, 2022 10:03 amOkay you stupid pig.Dontaskme wrote: ↑Sat Jun 18, 2022 9:21 amThey are fine people. I love them.promethean75 wrote: ↑Sat Jun 18, 2022 6:01 am
I have nothing against the niggars and think they're fine people.
Just as I love my cat who has black and white fur. Mostly black. I love to playfully tease her by calling her all the names under the sun because it's funny. When she is being overbearingly attention seeking, I say to her.. simmer down you nigga or sometimes I call her a black bastard. She doesn't seem to mind or become offended because she has no sense of self importance. It's just pure harmless play at work.
Dawkins and Hitchens admit there IS evidence for God?
Re: Dawkins and Hitchens admit there IS evidence for God?
Re: Dawkins and Hitchens admit there IS evidence for God?
So much for the "harmless play at work".Dontaskme wrote: ↑Sat Jun 18, 2022 10:22 amShut up you fucking ho whore slime ball kunt face.Age wrote: ↑Sat Jun 18, 2022 10:03 amOkay you stupid pig.Dontaskme wrote: ↑Sat Jun 18, 2022 9:21 am
They are fine people. I love them.
Just as I love my cat who has black and white fur. Mostly black. I love to playfully tease her by calling her all the names under the sun because it's funny. When she is being overbearingly attention seeking, I say to her.. simmer down you nigga or sometimes I call her a black bastard. She doesn't seem to mind or become offended because she has no sense of self importance. It's just pure harmless play at work.
Does that "play" only work ONE WAY, or are you just joining in and continuing in 'playing' with me here?
Your FULL and Truly OPEN Honesty would much appreciated here, as always.
Re: Dawkins and Hitchens admit there IS evidence for God?
When the understanding dawns that the one name calling another is just an illusory expression of nothingness...it can be seen as harmless play.
Only that which believes there is something here to defend sees harm as being a threat to it's belief, triggering a reaction that manifests a defence mode in order to protect the belief.
Once beliefs are seen through for what they truly are, aka illusions, there remains only laughter.
Re: Dawkins and Hitchens admit there IS evidence for God?
So, are you now admitting that it was 'you', "dontaskme", who was NOT UNDERSTANDING what was happening and occurring here? As it was 'you' who STARTED 'defending'. So, was it your very OWN BELIEFS that triggered that reaction of YOURS?Dontaskme wrote: ↑Sat Jun 18, 2022 10:58 amWhen the understanding dawns that the one name calling another is just an illusory expression of nothingness...it can be seen as harmless play.
Only that which believes there is something here to defend sees harm as being a threat to it's belief, triggering a reaction that manifests a defence mode in order to protect the belief.
Once beliefs are seen through for what they truly are, aka illusions, there remains only laughter.
After all I was doing nothing else here other than laughing, while POINTING OUT, SHOWING, and REVEALING just how CONTRADICTAORY you can REALLY BE here.
Re: Dawkins and Hitchens admit there IS evidence for God?
Age wrote: ↑Sat Jun 18, 2022 11:11 am
So, are you now admitting that it was 'you', "dontaskme", who was NOT UNDERSTANDING what was happening and occurring here? As it was 'you' who STARTED 'defending'. So, was it your very OWN BELIEFS that triggered that reaction of YOURS?
After all I was doing nothing else here other than laughing, while POINTING OUT, SHOWING, and REVEALING just how CONTRADICTAORY you can REALLY BE here.
Re: Dawkins and Hitchens admit there IS evidence for God?
Are you aware that it is possible to laugh here while still being Truly OPEN and Honest at the same time?Dontaskme wrote: ↑Sat Jun 18, 2022 11:15 amAge wrote: ↑Sat Jun 18, 2022 11:11 am
So, are you now admitting that it was 'you', "dontaskme", who was NOT UNDERSTANDING what was happening and occurring here? As it was 'you' who STARTED 'defending'. So, was it your very OWN BELIEFS that triggered that reaction of YOURS?
After all I was doing nothing else here other than laughing, while POINTING OUT, SHOWING, and REVEALING just how CONTRADICTAORY you can REALLY BE here.
Re: Dawkins and Hitchens admit there IS evidence for God?
Re: Dawkins and Hitchens admit there IS evidence for God?
But you will still NOT see the answer I posed to your question if it was stuck to your retina.
Re: Dawkins and Hitchens admit there IS evidence for God?
I asked you:
So, are you now admitting that it was 'you', "dontaskme", who was NOT UNDERSTANDING what was happening and occurring here?
AND:
As it was 'you' who STARTED 'defending'. So, was it your very OWN BELIEFS that triggered that reaction of YOURS?
So, WHERE EXACTLY are YOUR answers to these questions?
BOTH are 'Yes' or 'No' answers.
So, did you REALLY pose answers to these questions as you are CLAIMING you HAVE?
Re: Dawkins and Hitchens admit there IS evidence for God?
Yes and No.Age wrote: ↑Sat Jun 18, 2022 5:21 pm
I asked you:
So, are you now admitting that it was 'you', "dontaskme", who was NOT UNDERSTANDING what was happening and occurring here?
AND:
As it was 'you' who STARTED 'defending'. So, was it your very OWN BELIEFS that triggered that reaction of YOURS?
So, WHERE EXACTLY are YOUR answers to these questions?
BOTH are 'Yes' or 'No' answers.
So, did you REALLY pose answers to these questions as you are CLAIMING you HAVE?
Re: Dawkins and Hitchens admit there IS evidence for God?
Thank you for at least being HALF honest, this time.Dontaskme wrote: ↑Sat Jun 18, 2022 5:35 pmYes and No.Age wrote: ↑Sat Jun 18, 2022 5:21 pm
I asked you:
So, are you now admitting that it was 'you', "dontaskme", who was NOT UNDERSTANDING what was happening and occurring here?
AND:
As it was 'you' who STARTED 'defending'. So, was it your very OWN BELIEFS that triggered that reaction of YOURS?
So, WHERE EXACTLY are YOUR answers to these questions?
BOTH are 'Yes' or 'No' answers.
So, did you REALLY pose answers to these questions as you are CLAIMING you HAVE?
Re: Dawkins and Hitchens admit there IS evidence for God?
WHAT is the 'me', which 'you' CLAIM there are two halves of?
AND, which half of ' you' is making THAT CLAIM?
Would the other half of 'you' say and CLAIM the EXACT OPPOSITE?
If yes, then WHY?