seeds wrote: ↑Fri Jun 17, 2022 8:07 pm
seeds wrote: ↑Thu Jun 16, 2022 5:56 am
I see, so you've gone into how to prevent children from dying from incurable diseases and accidents so that parents will never have to suffer?
That's amazing!
Can you provide a little more detail as to how to prevent such things?
Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Thu Jun 16, 2022 6:38 am
Again you show your lack of intelligence and knowledge.
For example that image of the starving child could be the famine of Ethiopia sometime ago.
From then, the world and the country has taken steps of prevent those sort of sufferings.
The geographical location or cause of the child's immediate dilemma is
completely irrelevant to the point being made about your nihilistic philosophy offering absolutely no
"hope" to humans that there may be more to our existence than meets the eye.
Therefore, the only conclusion I can come to in assessing your obvious attempt to sidetrack the narrative is that
you are a dishonest person who will resort to any devious means you can think of in order to avoid answering problematic questions in regard to your materialistic philosophy.
I've also noticed, if not overt dishonesty, then pure self-delusion in your silly attempt to falsely define yourself in a way that you think the rest of us are too dumb to notice, as is witnessed in the following episode of your illogical thinking...
You are the one who is very deceptive and dishonest due to desperation thus unable to exercise the intellectual "Principle of Charity".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_charity
I don't think you even understand what this is about which is about intellectual honesty and integrity.
Note I used "
For example" thus which could be anywhere in general.
Wherever that happened anywhere in the world, the first thing is one will naturally empathize with the people sufferings, offer words of consolations and most critical to take corrective and preventive actions pro-actively.
You offer none of the above but rather dishonesty accused others of nihilism.
My philosophy is Kantian based which is
action-orientated with the following visions and missions,
1. What can I know? epistemology
2. What can I do? -Morality and Ethics
3. What can I hope for? Aesthetic, perpectual peace.
Yours? nada!!
Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Tue Jun 07, 2022 6:06 am
...the term 'atheist' had been and is used pejoratively that I don't want to use the term but rather prefer to be
not-a-theist.
What you "want," or what you "prefer" is irrelevant to what is actually true.
The simplest and most widely accepted dictionary definition of the word "atheist" is as follows:
atheist
noun
a person who disbelieves or lacks belief in the existence of God...
To which I suggest that any person who makes it their life's mission to convince other persons that
"God is an impossibility to be real," is the epitome of what it means to be an atheist.
Therefore, be it a pejorative or not, you are most definitely an atheist.
So, own it, for crying out loud.
Now, of course, you are certainly free to believe anything you wish.
However (and again), the fact that you do not "prefer" the title of "atheist" is
completely irrelevant to what is actually true, as was your sidetracking comment about the world getting better at reducing the causes of suffering is
completely irrelevant to the point I was making about the child.
Again, Veritas, you are proving yourself to be a very dishonest (devious) person.
_______
Again you are intellectually bankrupt and too rigid.
There are many a reason why it is necessary to opt for a synonymous word over another.
You mean all these synonymous words, "Fag, Faggot, Dyke, Homo, Fairy, Lez, Puff, tranny, etc." to transgenders are OK?
your sidetracking comment about the world getting better at reducing the causes of suffering is completely irrelevant to the point I was making about the child.
where is you humanity in the case?
-taking corrective and preventive actions pro-actively to ensure continual improvement for the well beings of individuals and humanity is irrelevant to such a sight?
Btw, you need to eliminate the possibility of Temporal Lobe Epilepsy in your case.
Temporal Epilepsy: God as a Psychological Derivative
viewtopic.php?f=11&t=35084