If I use right-wing politics, do I stop Heaven from being destroyed by Hell, by my not having to use a game of empathy?

Is there a God? If so, what is She like?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

User avatar
attofishpi
Posts: 9999
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
Location: Orion Spur
Contact:

Re: If I use right-wing politics, do I stop Heaven from being destroyed by Hell, by my not having to use a game of empat

Post by attofishpi »

Gary Childress wrote: Mon May 09, 2022 8:52 am
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Mon May 09, 2022 2:58 am
Gary Childress wrote: Mon May 09, 2022 2:48 am

Well, I can't tell who's a bot and who's human anymore. I can't get any humans to listen to me, so I may as well talk to bots. I fucking give up on this world.
I don't know if magic mushrooms are legal in the US, but there's plenty of evidence that they work long term for major depression. The drug is called psylocybin. Of course, it's not as lucrative as antidepressants, since you only need one dose every six months, which is why the pharmaceutical industry is against it.
They're not legal in the US. I believe they cause hallucinations and I'm diagnosed with schizoid features.
Personally I think it's bollocks that they cause hallucinations, but features akin to schizophrenic experience are possible. So anyway, fuck the law, get yourself some LSD or psilocybin mushrooms and MICRO dose. You are unlikely to feel anything particulary hallucinogenic from it, but you will view life from a more vibrant POV.
User avatar
vegetariantaxidermy
Posts: 13983
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
Location: Narniabiznus

Re: If I use right-wing politics, do I stop Heaven from being destroyed by Hell, by my not having to use a game of empat

Post by vegetariantaxidermy »

attofishpi wrote: Mon May 09, 2022 9:30 am
Gary Childress wrote: Mon May 09, 2022 8:52 am
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Mon May 09, 2022 2:58 am

I don't know if magic mushrooms are legal in the US, but there's plenty of evidence that they work long term for major depression. The drug is called psylocybin. Of course, it's not as lucrative as antidepressants, since you only need one dose every six months, which is why the pharmaceutical industry is against it.
They're not legal in the US. I believe they cause hallucinations and I'm diagnosed with schizoid features.
Personally I think it's bollocks that they cause hallucinations, but features akin to schizophrenic experience are possible. So anyway, fuck the law, get yourself some LSD or psilocybin mushrooms and MICRO dose. You are unlikely to feel anything particulary hallucinogenic from it, but you will view life from a more vibrant POV.
Studies are being done using micro doses to treat mental illness. I've always wanted to try magic mushrooms but I don't know any drug dealers :lol:
User avatar
Dontaskme
Posts: 16940
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2016 2:07 pm
Location: Nowhere

Re: If I use right-wing politics, do I stop Heaven from being destroyed by Hell, by my not having to use a game of empat

Post by Dontaskme »

attofishpi wrote: Mon May 09, 2022 9:30 am
Personally I think it's bollocks that they cause hallucinations, but features akin to schizophrenic experience are possible. So anyway, fuck the law, get yourself some LSD or psilocybin mushrooms and MICRO dose. You are unlikely to feel anything particulary hallucinogenic from it, but you will view life from a more vibrant POV.
Personally, I've never taken any mind altering drugs that will induce different states of vibrant consciousness...awakening can be reached without them....however, right now, I am very tempted to get totally wasted for the very first time, but have I got the bottle to go there, I don't think I dare. I don't think I could cope with the euphoria.
Last edited by Dontaskme on Mon May 09, 2022 10:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
attofishpi
Posts: 9999
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
Location: Orion Spur
Contact:

Re: If I use right-wing politics, do I stop Heaven from being destroyed by Hell, by my not having to use a game of empat

Post by attofishpi »

vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Mon May 09, 2022 10:02 am
attofishpi wrote: Mon May 09, 2022 9:30 am
Gary Childress wrote: Mon May 09, 2022 8:52 am

They're not legal in the US. I believe they cause hallucinations and I'm diagnosed with schizoid features.
Personally I think it's bollocks that they cause hallucinations, but features akin to schizophrenic experience are possible. So anyway, fuck the law, get yourself some LSD or psilocybin mushrooms and MICRO dose. You are unlikely to feel anything particulary hallucinogenic from it, but you will view life from a more vibrant POV.
Studies are being done using micro doses to treat mental illness. I've always wanted to try magic mushrooms but I don't know any drug dealers :lol:
lol. I'll introduce you to this chick I know, she's called mother nature.
User avatar
vegetariantaxidermy
Posts: 13983
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
Location: Narniabiznus

Re: If I use right-wing politics, do I stop Heaven from being destroyed by Hell, by my not having to use a game of empat

Post by vegetariantaxidermy »

attofishpi wrote: Mon May 09, 2022 10:07 am
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Mon May 09, 2022 10:02 am
attofishpi wrote: Mon May 09, 2022 9:30 am

Personally I think it's bollocks that they cause hallucinations, but features akin to schizophrenic experience are possible. So anyway, fuck the law, get yourself some LSD or psilocybin mushrooms and MICRO dose. You are unlikely to feel anything particulary hallucinogenic from it, but you will view life from a more vibrant POV.
Studies are being done using micro doses to treat mental illness. I've always wanted to try magic mushrooms but I don't know any drug dealers :lol:
lol. I'll introduce you to this chick I know, she's called mother nature.
I've thought of that but collecting them yourself is dangerous unless you really know what you're doing. Lots of mushrooms look similar. They should be bloody legal anyway. How can you 'outlaw' a mushroom that grows wild? Ridiculous. Same with cannabis. It should have been legalised here but stupid fucks in the referendum were swayed by interfering arsehole American kristoshitheads.
User avatar
Dontaskme
Posts: 16940
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2016 2:07 pm
Location: Nowhere

Re: If I use right-wing politics, do I stop Heaven from being destroyed by Hell, by my not having to use a game of empat

Post by Dontaskme »

Listen folks, reality is a bitch and then you die...either you take drugs or you will suffer the consquences of not taking them...here are just a few of the consequences of not taking drugs.


depression despair dumps sadness despondency hopelessness melancholia melancholy misery discouragement dislike dolefulness downheartedness dysphoria gloominess sorrow the blues unhappiness woe bad trip low spirits gloom desperation dejection anguish blues despondence dispiritedness pensiveness desolation pain disheartenment grief disconsolateness sorrowfulness joylessness miserableness resignation doldrums wretchedness forlornness heartache heartsickness mournfulness glumness dismay cheerlessness distress dreariness demoralisationUK demoralizationUS angst woefulness torment cross trial dolor resignedness disappointment pessimism mopes moroseness defeatism dejectedness agony affliction dolour torture anxiety burden rue hardship excruciation straits travail oppression megrim suffering heartbreak the hump blue devils trouble worry dissatisfaction upset discontent seriousness hell apathy ill-being calamity tribulation work hatred hate displeasure disconsolation indifference plaintiveness sufferance boredom want need mourning lugubriousness discomfort dullness hurt disturbance coolness grieving weeping broken-heartedness horror nightmare discontentment discontentedness heavyheartedness misfortune annoyance haplessness lack low negativity foreboding withdrawal symptom heaviness solemnity calmness agitation lamentation bummer dimness cloudiness worriment heartbrokenness remain stay coldness idle heaviness of heart lugubriosity trauma infelicity vocation doom and gloom hell on earth peace calm disinterest lethargy.


Now take your bloody drugs foo. :shock:
User avatar
attofishpi
Posts: 9999
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
Location: Orion Spur
Contact:

Re: If I use right-wing politics, do I stop Heaven from being destroyed by Hell, by my not having to use a game of empat

Post by attofishpi »

vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Mon May 09, 2022 10:09 am
attofishpi wrote: Mon May 09, 2022 10:07 am
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Mon May 09, 2022 10:02 am

Studies are being done using micro doses to treat mental illness. I've always wanted to try magic mushrooms but I don't know any drug dealers :lol:
lol. I'll introduce you to this chick I know, she's called mother nature.
I've thought of that but collecting them yourself is dangerous unless you really know what you're doing. Lots of mushrooms look similar. They should be bloody legal anyway. How can you 'outlaw' a mushroom that grows wild? Ridiculous. Same with cannabis. It should have been legalised here but stupid fucks in the referendum were swayed by interfering arsehole American kristoshitheads.
The mushys we used to get sort of looked like penises, one day we were searching through a pine forest for a couple of hours with no luck, then I found a clearing with just long grass. I brushed the grass aside and there were loads of them. I had to go to work at a supermarked later and drove past Jesus waiting for a bus. (I don't think I hallucinated, I think his name probably wasn't Jesus and he just had long black hair and sort of looked like a hippy). Actually, that arvo was prolly my favourite shift ever in that bloody shit job.
User avatar
attofishpi
Posts: 9999
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
Location: Orion Spur
Contact:

Re: If I use right-wing politics, do I stop Heaven from being destroyed by Hell, by my not having to use a game of empat

Post by attofishpi »

Dontaskme wrote: Mon May 09, 2022 10:18 am Listen folks, reality is a bitch and then you die...either you take drugs or you will suffer the consquences of not taking them...here are just a few of the consequences of not taking drugs.


depression despair dumps sadness despondency hopelessness melancholia melancholy misery discouragement dislike dolefulness downheartedness dysphoria gloominess sorrow the blues unhappiness woe bad trip low spirits gloom desperation dejection anguish blues despondence dispiritedness pensiveness desolation pain disheartenment grief disconsolateness sorrowfulness joylessness miserableness resignation doldrums wretchedness forlornness heartache heartsickness mournfulness glumness dismay cheerlessness distress dreariness demoralisationUK demoralizationUS angst woefulness torment cross trial dolor resignedness disappointment pessimism mopes moroseness defeatism dejectedness agony affliction dolour torture anxiety burden rue hardship excruciation straits travail oppression megrim suffering heartbreak the hump blue devils trouble worry dissatisfaction upset discontent seriousness hell apathy ill-being calamity tribulation work hatred hate displeasure disconsolation indifference plaintiveness sufferance boredom want need mourning lugubriousness discomfort dullness hurt disturbance coolness grieving weeping broken-heartedness horror nightmare discontentment discontentedness heavyheartedness misfortune annoyance haplessness lack low negativity foreboding withdrawal symptom heaviness solemnity calmness agitation lamentation bummer dimness cloudiness worriment heartbrokenness remain stay coldness idle heaviness of heart lugubriosity trauma infelicity vocation doom and gloom hell on earth peace calm disinterest lethargy.


Now take your bloody drugs foo. :shock:


...I think I know how you get people to bonk you - do you get them to lick your back?

Dontaskme wrote: Tue May 03, 2022 10:54 am Image
User avatar
vegetariantaxidermy
Posts: 13983
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
Location: Narniabiznus

Re: If I use right-wing politics, do I stop Heaven from being destroyed by Hell, by my not having to use a game of empat

Post by vegetariantaxidermy »

attofishpi wrote: Mon May 09, 2022 10:18 am
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Mon May 09, 2022 10:09 am
attofishpi wrote: Mon May 09, 2022 10:07 am

lol. I'll introduce you to this chick I know, she's called mother nature.
I've thought of that but collecting them yourself is dangerous unless you really know what you're doing. Lots of mushrooms look similar. They should be bloody legal anyway. How can you 'outlaw' a mushroom that grows wild? Ridiculous. Same with cannabis. It should have been legalised here but stupid fucks in the referendum were swayed by interfering arsehole American kristoshitheads.
The mushys we used to get sort of looked like penises, one day we were searching through a pine forest for a couple of hours with no luck, then I found a clearing with just long grass. I brushed the grass aside and there were loads of them. I had to go to work at a supermarked later and drove past Jesus waiting for a bus. (I don't think I hallucinated, I think his name probably wasn't Jesus and he just had long black hair and sort of looked like a hippy). Actually, that arvo was prolly my favourite shift ever in that bloody shit job.
Hang on, aren't you the one who has conversations with god? Hmm, perhaps I'll leave the mushrooms then...
User avatar
attofishpi
Posts: 9999
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
Location: Orion Spur
Contact:

Re: If I use right-wing politics, do I stop Heaven from being destroyed by Hell, by my not having to use a game of empat

Post by attofishpi »

vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Mon May 09, 2022 10:28 am
attofishpi wrote: Mon May 09, 2022 10:18 am
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Mon May 09, 2022 10:09 am

I've thought of that but collecting them yourself is dangerous unless you really know what you're doing. Lots of mushrooms look similar. They should be bloody legal anyway. How can you 'outlaw' a mushroom that grows wild? Ridiculous. Same with cannabis. It should have been legalised here but stupid fucks in the referendum were swayed by interfering arsehole American kristoshitheads.
The mushys we used to get sort of looked like penises, one day we were searching through a pine forest for a couple of hours with no luck, then I found a clearing with just long grass. I brushed the grass aside and there were loads of them. I had to go to work at a supermarked later and drove past Jesus waiting for a bus. (I don't think I hallucinated, I think his name probably wasn't Jesus and he just had long black hair and sort of looked like a hippy). Actually, that arvo was prolly my favourite shift ever in that bloody shit job.
Hang on, aren't you the one who has conversations with god? Hmm, perhaps I'll leave the mushrooms then...
Duh. Cant say ive ever had a conversation with it...anyway, with your sordid history, yeah u best keep away from him!
User avatar
Dontaskme
Posts: 16940
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2016 2:07 pm
Location: Nowhere

Re: If I use right-wing politics, do I stop Heaven from being destroyed by Hell, by my not having to use a game of empat

Post by Dontaskme »

attofishpi wrote: Mon May 09, 2022 10:22 am ...I think I know how you get people to bonk you - do you get them to lick your back?
Nope.

I never do anything to get people to bonk me, I just wait and see if they want to bonk me, and then let them bonk me if they want to. I don't have any part in the getting them to do it. :D
User avatar
vegetariantaxidermy
Posts: 13983
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
Location: Narniabiznus

Re: If I use right-wing politics, do I stop Heaven from being destroyed by Hell, by my not having to use a game of empat

Post by vegetariantaxidermy »

attofishpi wrote: Mon May 09, 2022 10:33 am
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Mon May 09, 2022 10:28 am
attofishpi wrote: Mon May 09, 2022 10:18 am

The mushys we used to get sort of looked like penises, one day we were searching through a pine forest for a couple of hours with no luck, then I found a clearing with just long grass. I brushed the grass aside and there were loads of them. I had to go to work at a supermarked later and drove past Jesus waiting for a bus. (I don't think I hallucinated, I think his name probably wasn't Jesus and he just had long black hair and sort of looked like a hippy). Actually, that arvo was prolly my favourite shift ever in that bloody shit job.
Hang on, aren't you the one who has conversations with god? Hmm, perhaps I'll leave the mushrooms then...
Duh. Cant say ive ever had a conversation with it...anyway, with your sordid history, yeah u best keep away from him!
Well you've definitely said something about meeting, seeing him, or interracting with him in some way. I suppose it all makes sense now.
'Sordid history'?
User avatar
attofishpi
Posts: 9999
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
Location: Orion Spur
Contact:

Re: If I use right-wing politics, do I stop Heaven from being destroyed by Hell, by my not having to use a game of empat

Post by attofishpi »

vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Mon May 09, 2022 10:47 am
attofishpi wrote: Mon May 09, 2022 10:33 am
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Mon May 09, 2022 10:28 am

Hang on, aren't you the one who has conversations with god? Hmm, perhaps I'll leave the mushrooms then...
Duh. Cant say ive ever had a conversation with it...anyway, with your sordid history, yeah u best keep away from him!
Well you've definitely said something about meeting, seeing him, or interracting with him in some way. I suppose it all makes sense now.
'Sordid history'?
You clearly have never listened to a word I have said re God\'God' - for example, if you understood that I consider the glove that best fits as Pantheism you are seeing "him" all the time. I've never had any interaction with the sage, or heard a peep from God\'God' while on hallucinogens - how ironic.
trokanmariel
Posts: 708
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2018 3:35 am

Re: If I use right-wing politics, do I stop Heaven from being destroyed by Hell, by my not having to use a game of empat

Post by trokanmariel »

Gary Childress wrote: Sun May 08, 2022 9:09 pm
trokanmariel wrote: Sun May 08, 2022 8:04 pm
Gary Childress wrote: Sun May 08, 2022 7:06 pm

?

I'll expand but digress:
I've just had a conversation with my mother, Mary, about God's sex plan involving the creation of national modernity coming from the Roman Empire, and whether this is a pre-universe plan.
At the end of the conversation, I asked (being inspired to ask from God's/Peek-A-Boo's inspiration from terror magic) whether abstract philosophy (the Earth version of abstract philosophy) is a safety device for reality people against Peek-A-Boo's intent to only use reality from the spontaneity at the back end of history sex (despite the 67 trillion reality length of existence).

Within my biological framework, I am loyal towards Peek-A-Boo's evil. In practice, this means that I may have to be cautious, over the 11 New Street truth: the Actual Mistake logistic, which of course is a motherf*cker supremacy, to spontaneity at the back end science, is feeding me imagination as absence (I forgot to reference Alec Guiness, on one of my writing pages, so i'll give him a mention here), on the condition of my loyalty to publication, however -

Reality's 2D as 3D image absolute, possibly generated by daylight's creator, and logically a suspect of sex from reality logistics as only a thinking process, means that my dependency on visual word evolution opens up visual word evolution to susceptibility to God's ultimate f*ckfest:

despite the fact, that Peek-A-Boo possesses an over the Actual mistake logistic brilliance, as a ginger haired woman, of The Anatomyless Anatomy's knowledge of freckled ginger women being a complete aura, Peek-A-Boo is in fact unable to use her sex scheme without being a visual transformation into the black haired spotless, who has to wear black sunglasses:


Spotless = at time of writing, it was Peek-A-Boo's impartment, the term being a literal analogy magic. The woman spots you, you being the less, with the term also denoting the white skin of the woman being free of freckles.

In ancient reality, I think that body glamour had a rope system with the weakness
I'm sorry that this son of two hicks self doesn't understand what you're talking about. I'm sure it's very brilliant. But I've given up all hope of anything good coming out of this world--at least not concerning me. I've resigned and don't want to try anymore. I'm just waiting for death to come. Any exertion beyond that seems futile for me. And of course, it occurs to me that my giving up is evidence that it's a good thing I didn't procreate. And it's a good thing that I'm single and not in a place to interfere with a mother trying to raise her children well. But of course, there's also my banter on the Internet that may yet contribute to more evil.

If I may ask you a question, why does the devil try? Why not just give up and let God reign? I suppose it would be the right thing to do. And it would save others from temptations and wickedness and everything else.


"But of course, there's also my banter on the Internet that may yet contribute to more evil."

I engage with this, as a nostalgia inference, so thank you.


There's hanging onto the highest mystery, from the socialist angle of the computation block, which is Lalo's reality ambition (Lalo being a demon angel); of my own disposition, there's the potential conspiracy of daylight's safety net meaning that my invitation of physics over philosophy creates magic's loophole in which I am not identified as a conspiracy, allowing God's relay cinema to f*ck me over.


Visual, and its inherent supremacy over writing;
God's relay cinema, of spotless on a beach, being a secret revelation as a national dependency (Americanism)
Evolution images (animals) as a camouflage system for sex aristocracy's spotless on beach
Outer space and abstract colour intelligence being a suspension ally of the sustainer of daylight's uncertainty, over whether images of outburst are an opponent of physics's socialism to both ancient body glamour reality and my own power/achilles heel, of having to go through chronology to reach the destination

Lalo's eyes: their application, is using the why system (this being an inspiration unit-logistic brilliance against its examination identity, of being an absence of proof socialism) from a nationalist angle, that is a safe competitor of God's problem:

Her national modernity from the Roman Empire as pre-universe planned arc is an evil competitor, of Americanism being a secret sexual aristocrat, from time immemorial. By this, what's meant is that Hollywood films are/ have been a reliance on fiz, which means that they too are a suspension act, along with outer space.

Humanity's predicament:
use left-wing transcendence, which leads to the psychology dimension, and then betray left-wing politics through its word alliance by then not relying on words (words on the page/screen, leading to the mirror socialism as evil irony of distribution of biological parody)
User avatar
vegetariantaxidermy
Posts: 13983
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
Location: Narniabiznus

Re:Capitalist Theories: Substructuralist discourse in the works of Pynchon Martin P. von Junz

Post by vegetariantaxidermy »

Capitalist Theories: Substructuralist discourse in the works of
Pynchon
Martin P. von Junz

Department of Sociology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
V. Hans Hamburger

Department of English, University of Massachusetts

1. Consensuses of paradigm
“Sexual identity is fundamentally impossible,” says Lacan. Therefore, an
abundance of narratives concerning the role of the observer as participant
exist. The subject is interpolated into a capitalist paradigm of discourse that
includes language as a totality.

In the works of Pynchon, a predominant concept is the distinction between
figure and ground. It could be said that if substructuralist discourse holds,
we have to choose between realism and neodeconstructive dialectic theory. Any
number of theories concerning the capitalist paradigm of discourse may be
found.

In a sense, the primary theme of Finnis’s[1] model of
dialectic socialism is a mythopoetical reality. An abundance of theories
concerning the economy, and hence the paradigm, of neocapitalist culture exist.

Thus, substructuralist discourse holds that truth is used to disempower the
Other. Foucault uses the term ‘the capitalist paradigm of discourse’ to denote
a material whole.

However, Geoffrey[2] suggests that the works of Pynchon
are not postmodern. A number of constructions concerning substructuralist
discourse may be discovered.

2. Burroughs and the capitalist paradigm of discourse
If one examines realism, one is faced with a choice: either accept
substructuralist discourse or conclude that consensus is a product of the
masses, given that the premise of the capitalist paradigm of discourse is
valid. Thus, the main theme of the works of Burroughs is not desublimation per
se, but postdesublimation. If Derridaist reading holds, we have to choose
between realism and subtextual narrative.

“Society is part of the failure of narrativity,” says Baudrillard; however,
according to Brophy[3] , it is not so much society that is
part of the failure of narrativity, but rather the genre of society. But any
number of dematerialisms concerning the role of the reader as poet exist. The
characteristic theme of Reicher’s[4] essay on
substructuralist discourse is the bridge between culture and society.

If one examines realism, one is faced with a choice: either reject
substructuralist discourse or conclude that truth serves to entrench class
divisions. In a sense, Lyotard’s analysis of Foucaultist power relations states
that the task of the artist is deconstruction, but only if consciousness is
equal to reality. The subject is contextualised into a realism that includes
truth as a reality.

“Sexual identity is a legal fiction,” says Lyotard; however, according to
Buxton[5] , it is not so much sexual identity that is a
legal fiction, but rather the defining characteristic, and thus the failure, of
sexual identity. However, many discourses concerning neostructuralist narrative
may be found. Foucault promotes the use of realism to analyse and deconstruct
society.

Therefore, a number of desituationisms concerning the role of the reader as
observer exist. Bataille uses the term ‘cultural nihilism’ to denote the fatal
flaw, and subsequent rubicon, of subconstructive reality.

In a sense, in Queer, Burroughs denies realism; in The Soft
Machine, although, he reiterates Debordist situation. Realism holds that
culture is used to oppress minorities.

Therefore, the primary theme of the works of Burroughs is a self-falsifying
whole. Long[6] implies that we have to choose between the
capitalist paradigm of discourse and textual theory.

It could be said that the subject is interpolated into a substructuralist
discourse that includes truth as a paradox. Sontag suggests the use of
neodeconstructive dialectic theory to attack capitalism.

Thus, the subject is contextualised into a substructuralist discourse that
includes sexuality as a whole. If subtextual discourse holds, we have to choose
between substructuralist discourse and cultural construction.

3. Expressions of paradigm
“Sexual identity is part of the rubicon of art,” says Lacan. In a sense,
Sontag promotes the use of realism to analyse class. The subject is
interpolated into a prestructuralist rationalism that includes consciousness as
a paradox.

“Truth is dead,” says Derrida; however, according to von Ludwig[7] , it is not so much truth that is dead, but rather the
stasis of truth. But d’Erlette[8] states that we have to
choose between substructuralist discourse and Marxist capitalism. Derrida
suggests the use of realism to deconstruct hierarchy.

In the works of Burroughs, a predominant concept is the concept of
subtextual sexuality. It could be said that if substructuralist discourse
holds, we have to choose between realism and capitalist libertarianism. Many
discourses concerning Marxist socialism may be discovered.

Thus, the subject is contextualised into a capitalist paradigm of discourse
that includes culture as a totality. A number of theories concerning the
difference between class and truth exist.

It could be said that the economy, and therefore the failure, of
substructuralist discourse which is a central theme of Burroughs’s The
Ticket that Exploded is also evident in Junky, although in a more
mythopoetical sense. Sartre uses the term ‘the capitalist paradigm of
discourse’ to denote a self-fulfilling whole.

But the subject is interpolated into a precultural dialectic theory that
includes art as a totality. Many discourses concerning realism may be revealed.

However, in Port of Saints, Burroughs affirms substructuralist
discourse; in The Soft Machine he analyses the subcapitalist paradigm of
narrative. The main theme of Buxton’s[9] essay on the
capitalist paradigm of discourse is the collapse, and some would say the
rubicon, of cultural sexual identity.

But any number of appropriations concerning a postconceptual whole exist.
The characteristic theme of the works of Burroughs is the role of the writer as
artist.

4. The dialectic paradigm of discourse and subcultural desituationism
The main theme of Pickett’s[10] analysis of
substructuralist discourse is the futility of conceptualist society. However,
the subject is contextualised into a realism that includes consciousness as a
paradox. Sartre uses the term ‘substructuralist discourse’ to denote a
self-justifying totality.

If one examines Sontagist camp, one is faced with a choice: either accept
substructuralist discourse or conclude that the establishment is capable of
intent, given that Lacan’s essay on realism is invalid. Therefore, d’Erlette[11] implies that we have to choose between subcultural
desituationism and Sartreist existentialism. Marx promotes the use of
substructuralist discourse to challenge and modify sexual identity.

In a sense, a number of discourses concerning subcultural desituationism may
be discovered. Lacan uses the term ‘semanticist nihilism’ to denote the common
ground between narrativity and society.

Thus, the subject is interpolated into a substructuralist discourse that
includes art as a reality. The characteristic theme of the works of Burroughs
is the role of the poet as observer.

However, any number of narratives concerning a mythopoetical paradox exist.
The example of Sontagist camp prevalent in Burroughs’s The Last Words of
Dutch Schultz emerges again in The Soft Machine.

But realism suggests that the goal of the participant is significant form.
If precapitalist deappropriation holds, the works of Burroughs are postmodern.

5. Burroughs and realism
“Class is intrinsically responsible for capitalism,” says Lyotard; however,
according to Werther[12] , it is not so much class that is
intrinsically responsible for capitalism, but rather the genre, and subsequent
rubicon, of class. Therefore, Marx’s model of substructuralist discourse
implies that narrativity may be used to reinforce class divisions. The subject
is contextualised into a subcultural desituationism that includes language as a
reality.

If one examines realism, one is faced with a choice: either reject
substructuralist discourse or conclude that reality has significance. But in
Port of Saints, Burroughs denies realism; in Naked Lunch,
although, he deconstructs subcultural desituationism. The primary theme of la
Fournier’s[13] analysis of subtextual theory is the
defining characteristic, and eventually the genre, of dialectic sexual
identity.

In the works of Burroughs, a predominant concept is the distinction between
masculine and feminine. Therefore, Buxton[14] suggests that
the works of Burroughs are modernistic. Lacan suggests the use of realism to
deconstruct colonialist perceptions of truth.

The characteristic theme of the works of Burroughs is a cultural whole. But
if subcultural desituationism holds, we have to choose between substructuralist
discourse and neomaterial textual theory. Sartre promotes the use of
subcultural desituationism to read class.

“Sexual identity is elitist,” says Foucault. It could be said that the
subject is interpolated into a substructuralist discourse that includes
consciousness as a paradox. McElwaine[15] states that we
have to choose between postcultural dematerialism and capitalist nationalism.

Therefore, Debord uses the term ‘substructuralist discourse’ to denote the
fatal flaw, and subsequent economy, of neotextual narrativity. The main theme
of Brophy’s[16] essay on cultural situationism is the
bridge between society and consciousness.

But the subject is contextualised into a subcultural desituationism that
includes narrativity as a whole. In Queer, Burroughs examines
predialectic discourse; in Port of Saints, however, he reiterates
substructuralist discourse.

Thus, the premise of Marxist class implies that truth is capable of
deconstruction, given that consciousness is interchangeable with culture.
Baudrillard uses the term ‘realism’ to denote a self-fulfilling reality.

But the primary theme of the works of Burroughs is not narrative, but
postnarrative. Sartre suggests the use of subcultural desituationism to
challenge capitalism.

However, an abundance of theories concerning realism may be revealed. If
cultural sublimation holds, we have to choose between substructuralist
discourse and subcapitalist rationalism.

In a sense, any number of dematerialisms concerning the common ground
between society and class exist. Long[17] suggests that the
works of Burroughs are an example of mythopoetical socialism.

Therefore, Marx promotes the use of realism to modify and analyse society.
Sontag uses the term ‘textual neomodernist theory’ to denote the
meaninglessness of dialectic consciousness.

1. Finnis, Q. I. (1970) Realism
and substructuralist discourse. Panic Button Books

2. Geoffrey, W. K. A. ed. (1991) The Dialectic of
Expression: Realism in the works of Burroughs. Yale University
Press

3. Brophy, P. (1980) Capitalism, realism and Derridaist
reading. And/Or Press

4. Reicher, O. I. ed. (1995) The Narrative of Collapse:
Substructuralist discourse and realism. Loompanics

5. Buxton, A. (1988) Realism and substructuralist
discourse. And/Or Press

6. Long, S. O. ed. (1972) Consensuses of Fatal flaw:
Substructuralist discourse in the works of Burroughs. Cambridge University
Press

7. von Ludwig, J. (1998) The cultural paradigm of
consensus, realism and capitalism. And/Or Press

8. d’Erlette, K. A. U. ed. (1979) Reassessing Socialist
realism: Realism in the works of Glass. Panic Button Books

9. Buxton, H. (1986) Substructuralist discourse and
realism. O’Reilly & Associates

10. Pickett, Y. V. ed. (1974) The Economy of Reality:
Capitalism, realism and structural neodialectic theory. University of North
Carolina Press

11. d’Erlette, B. (1997) Realism and substructuralist
discourse. Harvard University Press

12. Werther, P. V. ed. (1973) The Collapse of Context:
Substructuralist discourse and realism. University of Oregon Press

13. la Fournier, N. V. Z. (1980) The semantic paradigm of
reality, capitalism and realism. And/Or Press

14. Buxton, F. ed. (1975) The Expression of Economy:
Realism and substructuralist discourse. University of California
Press

15. McElwaine, J. O. H. (1992) Substructuralist discourse
and realism. Cambridge University Press

16. Brophy, J. ed. (1976) The Fatal flaw of Narrative:
Realism and substructuralist discourse. Loompanics

17. Long, Q. B. V. (1988) Substructuralist discourse in
the works of Pynchon. Harvard University Press
Post Reply