Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Fri Oct 22, 2021 4:48 pm
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Fri Oct 22, 2021 4:35 pm
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Fri Oct 22, 2021 2:24 pm
No, you're assuming that, perhaps; but it wasn't true. I was only speaking of the view you had expressed, not of your person.
But the point is, who are these assumptions referring to?
Just to the ideology called "Non-Dualism."
Non-duality is not an ideology, nor is it a theory, nor is it an ism...it's a pointer that can be used as pointer to the true nature of existence prior to any knowledge of it. Knowledge is a mentally constructed world via concepts.
In reality, there's no such thing as Non-duality. ..because it's not a thing. Non-duality simply means duality...a concept known by no thing... The knowledge of opposites requires a knower. So how can duality not be duality as in Nonduality.. it can't...there is ONLY duality.
Non- Duality is this immediate not-knowing known, because that which is known cannot know anything. Duality is an instance of opposition or contrast between two concepts or two aspects of something, as a dualism. Dualism is born of the mind, as knowledge, a knowledge that can only point to the illusory nature of such knowledge. Since there is no such thing as mind. Mind is an illusion. No one has ever seen a mind. Concepts are known, not seen.
So again, To whom are these insulting viewpoints referring? Who is disagreeing with insulting viewpoints, who is doing that?
If like you say the person is not the one being insulted. Then what is insulted? are there according to you just these invisible insults flying around in empty space all insulting each other...That's basically what you are saying. ..
You did say you are talking at the insulting viewpoints not the person...so how does that work? please explain?