Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Fri Oct 22, 2021 5:08 pm
Nowhere did I claim that. The self is very far from innocent, in fact.
You said that you are disgreeing with the viewpoints. Not the person, so that in my logic means the person is innocent of the viewpoints being addressed.
A person is just another word for self, is it not, if not, then what the heck is the definition of a self and who or what is defining this definition? It can't be the person, because you've already said, it's not the person who is being adressed, it's the viewpoints.
So how does that work? who or what is addressing the viewpoints?
How can a person be far from innocent, from lets theres knowledge of some ''offensive name calling''...which prompts a reactive response, when you have already said, the viewpoints are the issue being addressed, not the self/person...
You are not making any sense, unless you would care to make some up...huh?
The truth is Mr Can, you have absolutely no understanding of the nondual REALITY...you lie when you make the claim you do.
You reject it because you do not understand it, just be honest and admit you do not understand it, man up and stop lying.
To be honest, you are not alone, many people reject it, because it's such a mindfuck for the brain to process.
I think it is estimated that only 1 in 5 million people truly get it...so don't try to convince yourself that you understand it and then say you reject it at the same time, that's just silly.