Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Wed Sep 15, 2021 8:33 pm
You've forgotten: mankind isn't given the right to destroy. He's given
stewardship. In other words, he answers
to God for what he does with the environment.
Why do you believe God gave humans the responsibilty of stewardship of an environment they did not even create? Remember, every one is born into an environment they personally did not ask for, nor did they have a desire or need to be here, nor did they create it with their own bare hands. Rather, everyone who is ever born has just randomly appeared here from out of the ethers. If your parents had never indulged in that random fleeting moment of intercourse resulting in a pregnancy that just happened to appear in the image of IC ... then you would never have existed at all, never ever ever.
So just who are you to know what the heck you are talking about. How does anyone who just randomly appears from nowhere, know what the heck they are talking about, it's very clear that anyone who says I am alive has no idea how they are alive, as no one has ever been alive before. And yet, as if by magic, they act as though they already know what they are talking about...yeah ok, bluffers. Bluff away to your hearts content, it's all just your meaningless story with about as much truth and reality to it, as the noise coming from barking dog.
Why didn't God just step up to the plate and govern his own creation, why expect a temporal pile of rotting flesh and bone to clean up the big bloody gory mess that nature dumped upon itself?
And then there's that ridculous claim that God the formless incarnated as and through Jesus the flesh, as his relation. So in essence, as the stupid story goes, the word ''relation'' can only mean the knowledge of opposites by association. ..meaning, if good exists, it's because bad exists, and that good can only be known in the absence of it's opposite which is bad. Flip the coin over, and know that bad can only be known because of the absence of it's opposite which is good.
So it's impossible for there to be a one sided knowledge....opposites have to exist in the exact same moment, and that all action is one unitary action and reaction in the moment. Absolutely is there ever a situation in life where it is both good and bad at the same time...in knowing, there is only known a reaction to every action... there is known only one or the other side of the story, not two sides of the story simultaneously...each side being possible because each side cause the other one to exist or not exist depending on which side is being known at the time of knowing by the only knowing there is which is you.
So God, in his incarnated relational manifestation state, at one with himself can NEVER be just one sided. Do you get that? Do you get that God is only ever answering to himself here as and through it's relationship with knowledge of which the concept man is that knowledge.
It's all a frigging story you've created.
God can only be another word for you.
Why don't you understand this simple fact?
.