Dontaskme wrote: ↑Wed Mar 31, 2021 3:17 pm
Age wrote: ↑Wed Mar 31, 2021 3:02 pm
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Wed Mar 31, 2021 12:31 pm
Nah, there is no way to deflect from myself - that would be like trying to jump over my own shadow.
But I NEVER mentioned ANY thing about deflecting from 'one's' "self".
I was just pointing out that 'you' NEVER even attempted to answer 'my' clarifying questions.
I'm glad you have returned to talk to me. I like talking to myself. Anyways, do you remember what I said, I said why ask dontaskme?
When you already know the answer to your own question... here
But there is ONLY One 'I', and It does KNOW.
WHY 'I' asked the one, known as "dontaskme", is for the EXACT SAME REASON that 'I' informed 'you' BEFORE.
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Wed Mar 31, 2021 3:17 pm
Age wrote: ↑Wed Mar 31, 2021 3:02 pmI had NO 'need' for 'clarification'. 'I' was just asking 'you' a clarifying question, to SEE if 'you' could, and would, answer that question.
No need to ask... because there is ONLY One 'I', and It does KNOW. I am that one too.
YET 'you' are the ONE who continues to INSIST that 'you' do NOT know.
Also. 'you' can NOT be that one 'too'. As there is ONLY One, there OBVIOUSLY can NOT be " another one 'too' ".
WHEN, and IF, 'you' learn and understand who and what 'I' am, then 'you' will KNOW WHERE and WHY 'you' are mistaken here.
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Wed Mar 31, 2021 3:17 pm
Age wrote: ↑Wed Mar 31, 2021 3:02 pmOBVIOUSLY, 'you' did NOT. As can be CLEARLY SEEN and PROVEN above.
I didn't need to.
OF COURSE you do NOT 'need' to answer clarifying questions. BUT if you could, and DID, then more people will LISTEN to 'you'.
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Wed Mar 31, 2021 3:17 pm
Age wrote: ↑Wed Mar 31, 2021 12:10 pm
But there is NO doubt to who AND what 'I' am. Thee IRREFUTABLE answer is ALREADY KNOWN by 'I'.
Remember, it is 'you', the one known as "dontaskme", who CLAIMS that 'I' am UNKNOWABLE.
Dontaskme is KNOWN...by 'I'
But ONLY to and by 'you', the one known as "dontaskme".
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Wed Mar 31, 2021 3:17 pm
Dontaskme does not know the 'I' ... that knowing is unknowable to the known, for the known is already being known by 'I' which is ONE...not two.
'Trying to' "justify" and 'deflect' from 'your' CONTRADICTIONS might work on 'some', but NOT on 'me'.
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Wed Mar 31, 2021 3:17 pm
Dontaskme doesn't know, for that would mean splitting into two, a knower and the known. The 'I' cannot do that. For 'I' is One
LOL
If only 'you' KNEW what was actually happening here. If 'I' is One, then 'I' am thee Knower, which is ALSO thee Known.
'you' are 'trying to' make the knower and the known two different things. The Knower and the Known IS One.
Do not forget, 'I' am the One saying 'I' am thee Knower, and thus thee Known because 'I', literally, ALREADY KNOW.